Features RSS

illustration of buckyballs in a planetary nebula

Fullerenes — a class of molecules composed entirely of interconnected carbon atoms — are the largest molecules definitively detected in space. Researchers using JWST to study a planetary nebula have found new spectral features from a fullerene composed of 60 carbon atoms, offering another way to study how these molecules form and survive in space.

Full of Fullerenes

planetary nebula Tc 1

Planetary nebula Tc 1 as seen by JWST. [NASA / ESA / CSA / Western University, J. Cami]

The planetary nebula Tc 1 holds special significance in the field of astrochemistry. More than a decade ago, researchers using the Spitzer Space Telescope studied this wispy nebula illuminated by the core of a dead star. These observations led to the first confident identification of molecules called fullerenes in space. Fullerenes are large molecules constructed from interconnected rings of carbon atoms, forming hollow spheres, rugby-ball shapes, and long tubes. Spheroidal fullerenes, especially C60, are commonly referred to as buckyballs.

Since that discovery, Tc 1 has been a hot spot for studies of buckyballs. However, researchers are still puzzling over how these large molecules form and survive in harsh space environments.

closeup of planetary nebula Tc 1

A closeup of the center of Tc 1, showing the region observed with JWST’s Mid-Infrared Instrument (black-to-yellow color scale) and Near-Infrared Spectrograph (white outline). The background color scale shows the nebula’s H-alpha emission as seen by the Very Large Telescope. [Adapted from Giese et al. 2026]

From Spitzer to JWST

Morgan Giese (The University of Western Ontario) and collaborators recently reported on the results of a JWST observing program that aimed to understand how fullerenes respond to changes in their environment. The team mapped the distribution of C60 molecules at varying distances from the powerful ionizing radiation of Tc 1’s central star.

The team successfully spotted the emission features from the fullerene C60 seen in earlier observations, but they also turned up something unexpected: a handful of prominent emission features from 3.5 to 5.2 microns that had not been reported previously.

Feature Presentation

What’s the source of these emission features? The distribution of the emission provides a strong clue: known spectral features from fullerenes C60 and C70 are concentrated in a narrow, bright ring around the center of the nebula, with diffuse emission suffusing the rest of the nebula — and the newfound spectral features follow the same distribution.

JWST spectrum of Tc 1

JWST spectrum of Tc 1 (black line) extracted from the area indicated by a black circle in the previous image. The orange and blue dashed lines show fits to the newfound emission bands, and the results of the anharmonic calculations are shown as the teal line below the JWST spectrum. Click to enlarge. [Giese et al. 2026]

This evidence hints that C60 or C70 is the source of these new features, but Giese’s team took the investigation a step further. Using anharmonic quantum chemical calculations, they computed the spectrum of C60‘s combination bands, which arise when multiple vibrational modes are excited at the same time. This is the first time this type of spectrum has been calculated for C60, and the authors found good agreement between their computed spectrum and the JWST spectrum, providing further evidence that C60 is the source of these bands.

Giese and coauthors found that 17% of the energy emitted by the C60 molecules in Tc 1 is released in these  combination bands, suggesting that these features must be taken into account when modeling the cooling of C60 molecules. The discovery of new fullerene spectral features also has implications for future studies of these molecules: since these features appear in a wavelength range where features from other complex molecules like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are weak, these newly identified bands provide a promising way to spot and study fullerenes across space environments.

Citation

“Detection of C60 Combination Bands in the Near-IR Spectrum of Tc 1,” Morgan M. Giese et al 2026 ApJL 1004 L32. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae76d5

Hypervelocity stars in galaxy

Zooming through the galaxy faster than they should, hypervelocity stars are a curious population of stars whose origins are often difficult to determine. A recent study presents the first evidence of an old, low-mass hypervelocity star launched from the Milky Way’s center, providing clues into this elusive set of fast-moving stars.

Flinging Fast Stars

Astronomers have caught a number of hypervelocity stars zipping through the Milky Way since their first discovery in 2005. With speeds fast enough to escape the galaxy, hypervelocity stars were launched off course by some strong dynamical interaction. One such method, known as the Hills mechanism, predicts that when a binary star system approaches the Milky Way’s central supermassive black hole, one binary member is captured by the black hole and the other is flung away with high velocity.

However, constraining a hypervelocity star’s origin to the galactic center is limited by uncertainties in distances and proper motions, muddling how well researchers have been able to trace their orbits backward. Among a number of candidate galactic center–origin hypervelocity stars, only one has been confidently identified as having been kicked from the galaxy’s center. Intriguingly, this hypervelocity star and most galactic center–origin candidates are young, massive stars — old, low-mass hypervelocity stars from the galactic center have yet to be identified.

What does this dearth of old, low-mass zooming stars mean? Either stars in the galactic center are preferentially young and massive, with fewer than expected old and small stars, or low-mass hypervelocity stars are missed by selection effects, challenging to detect in current surveys. Searching for hypervelocity stars with higher precision and sensitivity may allow astronomers to tease out this missing population and trace back more zooming stars to a Hills mechanism origin.

Discovering An Old Hypervelocity Star

Leveraging high-quality spectra from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) survey and precise astrometry from Gaia, Shunhong Deng (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; China West Normal University) and collaborators reported the discovery of the hypervelocity star DESI-HVS1. From the spectroscopic and astrometric analyses, the authors determined that DESI-HSV1 is a ~14-billion-year-old low-metallicity star with a mass about 80% that of the Sun’s, moving through the galaxy at 523 km/s.

Backward orbit integration

Backward-integrated orbits of DESI-HVS1 for three different galactic potential models. The blue, red, and green points show the star’s current position, closest approach to the galactic center, and position 50 million years ago, respectively. Click to enlarge. [Deng et al 2026]

Exploring the possible origins of this hypervelocity star, the authors integrated the star’s orbit backward in time for one billion years. The backward orbit integrations show the star approaching the galactic center where it then turns around, traveling away faster than the local escape velocity of the galaxy. Even when varying the galactic potential and constants, all orbit integrations suggest DESI-HVS1’s motion through the galaxy is most naturally explained by the Hills mechanism.

While more refined galaxy models and comparison to other candidate galactic center–origin hypervelocity stars are necessary to fully confirm its origins, DESI-HVS1 provides the first compelling evidence for an old, low-mass hypervelocity star candidate consistent with a galactic center launch. This suggests that the observed lack of such stars is likely not a reflection of the Milky Way’s central stellar population, but rather a consequence of observational constraints making such small hypervelocity stars particularly difficult to detect. As large spectroscopic and astrometric surveys continue to advance, the sample of galactic-center hypervelocity star candidates will grow, enabling further exploration of the stellar environment and dynamical processes at the Milky Way’s core.

Citation

“An Old, Low-mass, Metal-poor Hypervelocity Star Candidate Consistent with Galactic Center Origin,” Shunhong Deng et al 2026 ApJL 1003 L9. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae6505

illustration of GRB 250702B

What’s the story behind the longest gamma-ray burst ever observed? Researchers explore how repeated interactions between a white dwarf and an intermediate-mass black hole could explain GRB 250702B’s unusual properties.

An Exceptional Gamma-Ray Burst

GRB 250702 host galaxy

An image of GRB 250702B’s location within its host galaxy. [NASA, ESA, CSA, H. Sears (Rutgers). Image Processing: A. Pagan (STScI)]

In 2025, the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope spotted an intense flash of gamma rays from a distant, dusty galaxy, and a fleet of spacefaring and earthbound telescopes soon revealed the remarkable characteristics of the event. GRB 250702B featured multiple bursts spanning several hours, individual flares lasting roughly 100 seconds, and X-ray emission in the 24 hours leading up to the gamma-ray activity — something never seen before in a gamma-ray burst.

These characteristics have been challenging to explain with typical models of long gamma-ray burst formation, such as collapsing massive stars, but researchers have developed numerous promising alternatives. In a new research article, astronomers have shown how GRB 250702B’s behavior might be explained by repeated close encounters between a white dwarf and an intermediate-mass black hole.

Eccentric Close Encounters

Yuri Sato (Tohoku University) and collaborators modeled the source of GRB 250702B as a white dwarf that has been captured into orbit around an intermediate-mass black hole. In their model, the white dwarf travels on an extremely eccentric orbit, drawing close to the black hole roughly once an hour. Each time the white dwarf ventures close, the black hole’s tidal forces strip away part of the star until, after about 40 such encounters, the white dwarf is completely destroyed.

geometry of the GRB 250702B system

Schematics showing the orbit of the white dwarf (WD; left) and the geometries that produce observable and unobservable jets. Click to enlarge. [Sato et al. 2026]

When the black hole peels material away from the white dwarf, some material swirls into an accretion disk, and some is cast off into space. Accretion from the disk powers a narrow relativistic jet: the source of the event’s powerful gamma-ray flares. This should mean that there is one jet produced each time the white dwarf is partially disrupted — 40 times — yet astronomers detected only a handful of flares from GRB 250702B.

Jet Precession and Model Predictions

The discrepancy can be resolved if the angle between the jet and the black hole’s spin axis precesses over time so that only some of the jets are pointed toward us. This can occur if the accretion disk is misaligned relative to the black hole’s spin. As an alternative, disk instabilities or other processes could keep all but a few of the expected jets from being launched.

radio afterglow predictions for GRB 250702B

Predicted strength of the radio afterglow for the jet precession case (maximum case) and the case in which only four jets were launched due to disk instabilities or jet choking (minimum case). The x-axis shows the time since the burst was detected in X-rays by the Einstein Probe (EP). [Sato et al. 2026]

Sato and coauthors found that these two scenarios have different long-term outcomes, providing a potential way to ascertain what’s going on at the source; in the jet precession scenario, the jets that are launched away from our line of sight produce an order of magnitude more radio emission at late times.

This work by Sato and collaborators demonstrates how the repeated partial tidal disruption of a white dwarf by an intermediate-mass black hole can match the properties of one of the most remarkable recent transient sources — one that has pushed astronomers to consider new ways of producing gamma-ray bursts.

Citation

“Successive Partial Disruptions with Orbital Precession in a White Dwarf–Black Hole System for Repeating GRB 250702B,” Yuri Sato et al 2026 ApJL 1003 L44. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae6a8f

A photograph of an entire visible hemisphere of Mars.

When the third known object from the galactic space beyond our Sun barreled through the solar system last year, Earth was in a terrible spot to view its flyby. Thankfully, however, a spacecraft that was previously busy mapping Mars took advantage of much better positioning for a closer look.

Cheap Seats

Astronomers have now observed three interstellar objects as they’ve flown through the solar system: 1I/ʻOumuamua, which shocked astronomers in 2017; 2I/Borisov, which followed in 2019 and behaved almost identically to a solar system comet; and now 3I/ATLAS, which was found buzzing toward the Sun in July 2025. As soon as 3I/ATLAS was spotted, pretty much every telescope on the planet took a look. The data swiftly revealed much that intrigued astronomers: while 3I/ATLAS was behaving essentially like a standard comet, its chemistry was nothing like its solar system counterparts, and its coma and dust outflow were strangely shaped. Among other oddities, it seemed to counterintuitively have a dust tail that pointed toward the Sun.

A plot showing that Earth-based observations could only get as best a 20-degree out-of-plane view, while Mars-based observations could get up to nearly 40.

3I/ATLAS’s path across the sky as seen from Earth versus the clearer line of sight from Mars. The shaded region represents the times where the comet was too close to the Sun for viewing. [Xin Ren et al. 2026]

Unfortunately for astronomers, 3I/ATLAS didn’t make it easy for them to study the shape of its coma. Thanks to a cosmic coincidence, the interstellar visitor was traveling almost perfectly within the plane of our solar system, and Earthbound observers were often limited to an edge-on view of its tail. Even worse, 3I/ATLAS looped around the back of the Sun from our perspective, meaning no one on the planet could observe the comet for a few weeks in the fall. This led a group of astronomers to consider their assets that are farther from home.

Better View from Mars

The Tianwen-1 spacecraft, which entered Martian orbit in early 2021 and has been diligently mapping the Red Planet ever since, has a high-resolution camera that’s normally pointed at the planet’s surface. By spinning the spacecraft around, a team of researchers led by Xin Ren (National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences) repurposed the camera to act as a small telescope when 3I/ATLAS flew by. In another cosmic coincidence, 3I/ATLAS happened to pass very near Mars last fall, and this close approach gave Tianwen-1 a great out-of-plane view of the coma. The orbiter managed to capture 57 images of 3I/ATLAS over three days last fall, representing China’s first-ever observations of an object from an asset in deep space.

Multi-panel photographs of a comet against a background of streaked stars.

Stacked images of 3I/ATLAS from the Tianwen-1 orbiter across three epochs; the tail’s apparent shape shifts as the viewing geometry changes. Click to enlarge. [Xin Ren et al. 2026]

The team took full advantage of the great view and leveraged the spacecraft’s unique perspective to extract some intriguing results. By tracking how the gentle pressure of sunlight nudged the escaping grains, the researchers found that the coma is dominated by surprisingly large dust. With an average size of hundreds of microns across, the dust is more like coarse sand than smoke, and they found that it ambles away from the comet at just 3–10 meters per second. All told, 3I/ATLAS was shedding dust at roughly 1,000 kilograms every second. The big grains may be a fingerprint of a cold, distant birthplace: models suggest such grains collect in the frigid outer reaches of planet-forming disks, hinting that 3I/ATLAS was forged far from its parent star before being flung into the dark.

As new surveys begin to turn up interstellar interlopers more often, this improvised observation makes a tidy point: the spacecraft already scattered across the solar system can double as a fleet of opportunistic comet-watchers, each offering a view we simply can’t get from home.

Citation

“Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Observed from Mars by China’s Tianwen-1 Spacecraft,” Xin Ren et al 2026 ApJL 1003 L10. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae61b3

An illustration of an exoplanet about to be engulfed by its host star

Planets that get too close to their host stars are liable to be engulfed and consumed. New research explores how to identify stars that have had a planetary snack.

It’s Snack Time

Being a planet that closely orbits its star is dangerous, and various dynamical processes can draw a planet inward past the point of no return. When a planet vanishes beneath the surface of its host, it eventually disintegrates within the star, its atoms mixing into the blazing stellar soup.

This outcome is likely extremely common across the universe, and researchers have begun to see evidence for it: stars that appear to have absorbed angular momentum from their planets, white dwarfs with uncanny metals in their spectra, and stars with chemical abundances that don’t match those of their siblings. Now, in a recent publication led by Kaitlyn Lane (Vanderbilt University), researchers seek to find observational signatures of planetary engulfment of rocky exoplanets by main-sequence stars.

Modeling Engulfment

Lane’s team focused on main-sequence stars in the range of 0.5 to 1.4 solar masses, using one-dimensional analytical models to determine which of these stars will most readily display signs of having engulfed a planet. They simulated the stars as they consumed either an Earth-like planet or a super-Earth with the same composition as Earth but 15 times its mass.

illustration of a planet being engulfed by its star

Diagram showing a planet being engulfed by its star and beginning to disintegrate before migrating inward. The boundary between the star’s outer convective zone (CZ) and inner radiative zone is shown. Click to enlarge. [Lane et al. 2026]

At the onset of the model, the engulfment is set to begin, the planet placed tangent to the star’s surface. The planets sink down and orbit just barely within their stars for 1–10 years, their solid surfaces slowly beginning to evaporate.

After that relatively lengthy phase, the process proceeds rapidly: as the planet inches deeper into its star, the drag forces grow stronger and the planet’s demise accelerates, with the planet disintegrating over the course of hours. In the last phase, the planet makes its final plunge and is destroyed in a half hour.

Signs of Planets Past

Lane’s team found that the planets tended to be destroyed fully within the outer convective layer of their stars, except in the case of the most massive stars studied here. For more massive stars, the outer convective zone is shallower than it is for the less massive stars, allowing a chunk of each planet to survive the passage through the convective zone to reach the radiative zone below.

simulation results showing planets disintegrating within their host stars

The trajectories of three example cases, showing how the planet loses mass as it spirals inward. In the 1.4-solar-mass case, part of the planet survives to reach the radiative zone, but the shallowness of the star’s convective zone means that the disintegrated planetary material is easier to observe. Click to enlarge. [Lane et al. 2026]

What this translates to, for the purposes of identifying planet-eating stars from afar, is that stars near the top of the mass range studied — from 1.0 to 1.4 solar masses — make the best targets. This is because the tell-tale planetary metals are not overly diluted within the stars’ relatively small convective zones, making these elements easier to detect. In terms of specific metals, the authors found that aluminum, calcium, and vanadium are the best signposts of planetary engulfment, with lithium also making the list.

While the authors acknowledge that there’s more work to be done — they plan to investigate the impacts of planetary engulfment on stellar structure more closely, for example — this work represents an important foray into identifying targets for future studies of stars that have eaten their planets.

Citation

“Observable Metal Pollution in Main-Sequence Stars: Simulations of Rocky Planets Engulfed by Stars in the 0.5 to 1.4 M⊙ Range,” Kaitlyn T. Lane et al 2026 ApJ 1003 67. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5b9a

Millisecond pulsar and companion artist's impression

The fastest spinning pulsars in the universe are often quite difficult to detect. Leveraging multiple observations from the largest single-dish telescope in the world, researchers have discovered six previously undetected pulsars.

Millisecond Pulsars in Globular Clusters

Globular clusters, compact collections of tens of thousands to millions of stars, are highly dense and rife with dynamical interactions. These active environments are ideal factories for the formation of millisecond pulsars — the extremely fast-spinning cores of once-massive stars, shining beams of radio emission from their poles. One way millisecond pulsars are thought to form is when a pulsar in a binary system steals mass from its companion star, transferring angular momentum and causing the pulsar to spin up. The densely packed environment in a globular cluster provides ample opportunity for a pulsar to acquire a companion to siphon.

However, millisecond pulsars in distant globular clusters are notoriously difficult to detect. Traditional pulsar searches that rely on a single observation tend to miss millisecond pulsars, many of which have signals too faint to be distinguished from noise or radio interference. Instead, researchers must rely on a different method to find these fast-spinning pulsars.

FAST

FAST, the 500-meter single-dish radio telescope located in southwestern China. [Wikipedia user SCJiang; CC BY 4.0]

Stack Search Success

To find faint millisecond pulsars, researchers have developed the stack search method, in which multiple radio observations are combined to tease out faint signals and decrease noise. Reliably stacking observations across epochs requires stability; isolated millisecond pulsars, now no longer spinning up after losing their companion, have very stable rotation periods, making them ideal targets for the stack search method. To date, the stack search method has successfully identified nine isolated globular cluster millisecond pulsars using data from the Arecibo, Parkes, and Green Bank radio telescopes.

Stack Spectra

Power spectra from a discovered millisecond pulsar M15N. The black solid lines show the 19 individual observations of the pulsar, and the red solid line in the top panel shows the stacked spectrum. The stack search method pulls out a clear pulsar signal. [Dai et al. 2026]

In hopes of recovering more of these faint fast-spinning pulsars, Yinfeng Dai (Beijing Normal University) and collaborators used archival data obtained with the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST), the world’s largest single-dish telescope. Targeting two specific globular clusters, NGC 6517 and M15, the team applied the stack search method to 23 and 19 observations of the globular clusters, respectively. From their search, the authors discovered six previously unidentified isolated millisecond pulsars: four in NGC 6517 and two in M15.

While previous studies identified brighter pulsars in the targeted globular clusters, the authors confirmed that all six newly discovered pulsars are too weak to be reliably recovered from single-epoch searches, underscoring the importance of the stack search method. In particular, this search increased the known pulsar populations of NGC 6517 and M15 by 27% and 18%, respectively, suggesting that a meaningful fraction of globular cluster pulsars are easily missed in traditional pulsar searches. Future studies employing this stack search method will continue to detect faint millisecond pulsars, unlocking this elusive population for further exploration.

Citation

“The Stack Search Tests on FAST Data: Discovery of Six Faint Isolated Millisecond Pulsars in NGC 6517 and NGC 7078 (M15),” Yinfeng Dai et al 2026 ApJL 1002 L31. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae5dbb

Illustration of merging black holes

Where do black hole mergers happen? Recent research finds evidence that most black hole mergers occur in triple systems containing a close inner binary and a more distant third party.

Assembling Merging Black Holes

Thanks to the combined efforts of the LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA gravitational wave detectors, we’ve now collected the subtle signals from several hundred pairs of merging stellar-mass black holes. As this collection of spacetime ripples continues to grow, researchers are seeking to understand how these merging black hole pairs were assembled.

In the simplest scenario, pairs of high-mass stars independently evolve into black holes, lose momentum by emitting gravitational waves, and meld into one another. But the population of merging black holes likely contains contributions from multiple sources, including multiple-star systems, the disks surrounding accreting supermassive black holes, and black holes that have already experienced a merger. Which of these merging populations is reflected in our catalog of gravitational wave events?

Modeling Challenges

spin–orbit tilt diagram

A black hole binary system with aligned spins and orbit (top) and a binary with spins tilted by 90 degrees (bottom). [AAS Nova/Kerry Hensley]

In theory, this question can be answered by extracting the properties of merging black holes — mass, spin, and the like — from gravitational wave observations and comparing these properties against model predictions from different formation pathways. In reality, this is exceedingly difficult, as certain merger pathways can produce a wide variety of results, depending on assumptions or fine tuning.

So far, the increasingly large pool of gravitational wave detections tentatively points to a feature that could illuminate the sites of black hole mergers: a peak in the spin–orbit tilt distribution around 90 degrees. This feature has been most confidently extracted from nonparametric analyses, which do not make assumptions about the population of merging black holes, but it has also been hinted at in parametric analyses, which do make population-level assumptions.

Triple-System Feature

To investigate this feature further, a team led by Jakob Stegmann (Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics) performed a new, astrophysically motivated parametric analysis of the most recent catalog of gravitational wave detections from LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA.

black hole populations used in modeling the observed spin–orbit tilt distribution

The three populations in the team’s modeling. [Stegmann et al. 2026]

Their modeling tests combinations of multiple populations, including mergers in isolated binary systems, triple-star systems, and dense environments like star clusters. They also include a potential contribution from higher-mass mergers involving black holes that have merged previously. Using this framework, Stegmann’s team found that the observed spin–orbit tilt distribution is best matched by a model dominated by mergers in triple-star systems, with some contribution from other sources.

Posterior predictive distribution of black hole spin–orbit tilts

Posterior predictive distribution of black hole spin–orbit tilts. Both the authors’ modeling (solid blue line) and the nonparametric modeling performed by the LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA collaboration (solid green line) find evidence for a peak in the spin–orbit tilt distribution near cosθ = 0. [Adapted from Stegmann et al. 2026]

Specifically, this finding suggests that most mergers occur in hierarchical triple systems, which naturally predict an excess of 90-degree spin–orbit tilts without any fine tuning. Hierarchical triples contain an inner close binary with a distant outer companion; in these systems, relativistic spin precession, gravitational wave emission, and oscillations in eccentricity and inclination work to tilt the black holes in the inner binary by 90 degrees.

Stegmann and collaborators pointed out that the triple-system scenario aligns well with other properties of the observed population of black hole mergers, such as the mass and effective spin distributions. This scenario may also be necessary to explain certain merging pairs that might have had slightly eccentric orbits at the moment of merging. If future gravitational wave observations strengthen the evidence for a peak in the spin–orbit tilt distribution near 90 degrees, it will have profound implications for how and where black holes merge in our universe.

Citation

“Gravitational-Wave Observations Suggest Most Black Hole Mergers Form in Triples,” Jakob Stegmann et al 2026 ApJL 1000 L59. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae52ec

artist's impression of hot Jupiter exoplanets

Each Jupiter-size planet in the galaxy falls into one of three distinct categories: hot, warm, or cold. A new study suggests that despite the apparent differences between these populations, they may have all formed from the same underlying dynamical process: a game of pool played at planetary scales.

A Diversity of Jupiters

Though our solar system has only one Jupiter-size planet, elsewhere in the galaxy we have found three different species of these massive gas giants. Cold Jupiters closely resemble their namesake and orbit far from their host stars; hot Jupiters are the opposite and are found whipping around their stars on extremely close-in orbits. In between these are the warm Jupiters, which tend to orbit in the intermediate space between 0.1 and 1.0 au.

A rendering of a star with lots of spots and flares with a planet in the foreground.

An artist’s depiction of a hot Jupiter. These planets orbit extremely close to their host stars, but likely got to their locations by scattering inward from more distant orbits. [NASA/JPL-Caltech]

Though these three populations are defined by their orbital distances, they differ from each other in other ways as well. For example, hot Jupiters almost never have nearby companions; if there are any other planets circling the same star, they’re usually far-out cold Jupiters. They can also orbit in pretty much any direction, including opposite the direction of their star’s spin, and are usually on perfectly circular orbits. In contrast, warm Jupiters often have friends nearby, are much more aligned with their stars’ spins, and can have modest eccentricities.

Given these differences, it’s often thought that each of these populations arrived at its current location through different dynamical processes and that the history of the warm Jupiters is likely quite different from the history of the hot Jupiters. However, a new study led by Julia Esposito (Georgia Institute of Technology) has proposed an alternative view. Maybe these populations, though they appear different now, were all created by the same process: planet–planet scattering.

Virtual Planetary Billiards

A cartoon of Jupiters at different distances from the sun with labelled arrows flowing inwards and outwards from each.

A schematic showing where different planets ended up as a function of where they scattered from during their evolution. Click to enlarge. [Esposito et al. 2026]

Esposito and collaborators set up 1,500 virtual planetary systems with three massive planets each, then simulated how the orbits evolved before probing the final configurations. In crucial contrast to previous simulation studies, the team initialized their Jupiters across a range of different distances and included the effects of tides sapping energy from orbits of planets that got too close to their host stars.

At the end of the simulation, the team surveyed the digital carnage. Almost every virtual system ended with only two planets after either ejecting one away from the star or having two planets collide. But, remarkably, the remaining two-planet systems looked tantalizingly similar to what we actually observe, with a mix of hot, warm, and cold Jupiters. Even more exciting, the end populations were highly correlated to where the violent scattering event took place.

For example, the warm Jupiters were almost all produced by “warm scattering” simulations, where the scattering took place between 0.1 and 1.0 au. The planets that survived the simulations and ended up as warm Jupiters matched all of the properties of the real warm Jupiter population: they had nearby companions, were moderately eccentric, and were mostly aligned with their stars. The hot Jupiters, meanwhile, were almost all produced by “cold scattering” events where the flybys happened far from the star and resulted in one planet hurtling inwards. These also matched all of the observed properties of real hot Jupiters.

The researchers concluded that planet–planet scattering can produce both the warm and hot Jupiter populations so long as you let the planets scatter from a variety of different distances. This exciting theoretical insight, if correct, would mean that astronomers could stop searching for different pathways to create each population. Happily, this model also provides testable predictions, and the authors lay out how the theory could be supported or disproven with additional data. Through virtual experiments like these, astronomers continue to build up an understanding of how the wide range of planetary architectures observed across the galaxy came to be.

Citation

“Unified Formation Channel of Hot and Warm Jupiters via Planet–Planet Scattering,” Julia Esposito et al 2026 ApJL 1003 L3. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae61b0

asteroid 2024 yr4

Discovered in December 2024, the roughly 60-meter-wide asteroid 2024 YR4 was initially thought to have a slim chance of striking Earth in 2032. Further observations ruled out an Earth impact but left open the possibility of a Moon impact. New JWST observations show that 2024 YR4 will speed past both Earth and the Moon without a collision.

Another Update on 2024 YR4

In April 2025, we featured a Research Note that described March 2025 JWST observations of 2024 YR4 and characterized the asteroid’s size and albedo. At the close of that article, the authors suggested that further JWST observations in early 2026 could help to refine our understanding of the asteroid’s trajectory and determine whether it would strike the Moon.

On 18 and 26 February 2026, JWST carried out those critical observations. In this dataset, the asteroid is bright enough to be detected confidently, and the background is peppered with a sufficient number of reference stars — two factors necessary to determine the precise track of the asteroid as it zipped through space.

Trajectory Refinement

Difference between estimated and observed position for 2024 YR4

Difference between the position of 2024 YR4 determined in this work using three different reduction methods (red, blue, and green circles) and the position drawn from the existing orbit from the JPL Horizons database. The different analysis methods yielded consistent results. [Adapted from De Wit et al. 2026]

Julien de Wit (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and collaborators analyzed the new JWST data and determined the asteroid’s position. The team used multiple methods to reduce the data and showed that their results were consistent regardless of the reduction method, ultimately yielding a measurement with an uncertainty of just 50 milliarcseconds. This is a huge improvement over the previous trajectory estimate, which had an uncertainty of 700 milliarcseconds.

Combining the latest JWST observations with existing data stretching back to the asteroid’s discovery, de Wit and coauthors determined a new, highly precise orbit for the object — one that definitively shows that the asteroid will safely pass by the Moon at a distance of 22,900 ± 800 km in 2032. In addition to ruling out the upcoming lunar impact, the team also ruled out any collisions with Earth in the next 100 years. Phew!

2024 YR4 observed and estimated position

Position of 2024 YR4 as seen by JWST in February 2026 (white dashed circle) compared to the asteroid’s location estimated from existing data (red circle). [De Wit et al. 2026]

High-Impact Science

This work highlights JWST’s potential as a tool for planetary defense. The February 2026 observations detailed here represent the faintest-ever detection of a near-Earth object, and JWST can detect objects far fainter than ground-based telescopes can. This ability allows JWST to observe potentially hazardous asteroids over a larger swath of their orbits, which translates to earlier trajectory estimation — JWST pinned down 2024 YR4’s orbit two years before the asteroid would have become bright enough for ground-based telescopes to do so.

JWST’s role may be even more important for smaller objects that rapidly become undetectable after discovery. De Wit’s team demonstrated this for a 10-meter-diameter 2024 YR4 clone on the same trajectory; for an object of this size, JWST would be able to rule out an Earth impact before the asteroid became undetectable, but ground-based telescopes could not. With surveys from facilities like Vera C. Rubin Observatory and Near-Earth Object Surveyor set to discover hundreds of thousands of new near-Earth objects, JWST’s role as a hazard assessor will likely be in high demand.

Citation

“JWST Observations of Asteroid 2024 YR4 Rule Out a 2032 Lunar Impact and Demonstrate a New Regime for Planetary Defense Follow-Up,” Julien de Wit et al 2026 ApJL 1003 L21. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae6a95

NGC 972

How do massive galaxies form and evolve? A recent study traces the stellar and dust distributions across evolutionary phases of massive galaxies to better understand how massive dusty star-forming galaxies fit into the picture.

Dusty Massive Galaxies

Massive galaxies, like the Milky Way or even larger, undergo phases of active star formation and quiescent phases of inactivity, but exactly how these galaxies evolve through these stages is not yet fully understood. Dusty star-forming galaxies, which are undergoing a period of intense star formation and shrouded in dust, might be the missing evolutionary step between star-forming and quiescent phases of massive galaxy evolution. 

Currently, the leading explanation for massive galaxy formation and evolution is inside-out growth — star formation and quenching start in the inner regions of a galaxy and progress outward. However, it’s not clear whether dusty star-forming galaxies also follow the favored inside-out pathway, or if they instead proceed outside-in, first growing their disks and then assembling a central bulge.

JWST NIRCam images

Example of JWST NIRCam images with ALMA contour lines overlaid for select dusty star-forming galaxies in the sample. [Modified from Bodansky et al 2026]

The spatial distribution (or morphology) of the stars and dust within dusty massive galaxies can help us trace their evolution. Thanks to high-resolution observations from JWST and the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), researchers can now directly compare the morphologies of distant star-forming, quiescent, and dusty galaxies during the height of our universe’s star formation. Filling this gap will reveal how dusty star-forming galaxies may connect star-forming and quiescent galaxies in massive galaxy evolution.

Multiwavelength Morphological Comparisons

To directly compare the star and dust morphologies across massive galaxies, Sarah Bodansky (University of Massachusetts, Amherst) and collaborators selected a sample of 33 dusty star-forming galaxies from the GOODS-ALMA 2.0 survey that searched the sky for 1.1-mm dust emission as well as star-forming and quiescent comparison samples drawn from JWST observations. Combining the ALMA survey data with JWST imaging, the authors studied the rest-frame optical (stars) and rest-frame near-infrared (dust) morphologies of dusty, star-forming, and quiescent galaxies at redshifts around cosmic noon (a few billion years after the Big Bang).

When comparing optical morphologies, the authors found that dusty star-forming galaxies and typical star-forming galaxies had similar distributions, but their near-infrared morphologies showed clear differences. Dusty galaxies tended to show more compact near-infrared emission, with dust tracing their stellar populations and more concentrated in the galaxies’ central regions. Though clearly different from star-forming galaxies, the authors noted striking similarities between the near-infrared morphologies of the dusty star-forming and quiescent galaxies, especially within their centers.

Surface brightness profiles

Average surface brightness profiles for the rest-optical (left) and rest-near-infrared (right) for the dusty (black), star-forming (blue), and quiescent (red) galaxies. In the near-infrared, the dusty star-forming galaxy profile appears very similar to the quiescent galaxy profile. [Bodansky et al 2026]

All of these properties suggest that dusty star-forming galaxies have built up stellar mass and dust in their cores, potentially forming a central bulge first and supporting an inside-out model of massive galaxy growth. This points to dusty star-forming galaxies as possible direct progenitors of early massive quiescent galaxies, hanging onto their last bit of star formation before becoming quiet as well. While this study morphologically distinguishes dusty galaxies from their star-forming and quiescent counterparts, future spectroscopic studies comparing the kinematics of these populations and investigations of molecular gas distributions are necessary to better pin down the evolutionary connection between star-forming, dusty, and quiescent massive galaxies.

Citation

“JWST+ALMA Reveal the Buildup of Stellar Mass in the Cores of Dusty Star-forming Galaxies at Cosmic Noon,” Sarah Bodansky et al 2026 ApJ 1001 235. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4f64

1 2 3 4 … 121