Features RSS

A photograph of Uranus against a black background.

A planned flagship spacecraft to Uranus was aiming to use Jupiter for a gravitational boost to shorten its journey to the outer solar system. Now that the mission’s launch date has been pushed back, it’ll need to find another way to its target.

Redesigning the Route

Uranus and Neptune, the ice giants of our solar system, have been comparatively neglected by humanity’s fleet of interplanetary probes. While all of the other major bodies have been visited by at least an orbiter or even a lander, the most detailed exploration we’ve done of these two planets happened when the Voyager 2 spacecraft went screaming past on its way toward interstellar space.

A two-panel top down view of the solar system with different trajectories overplotted.

Schematics of different trajectories within the solar system. Left: The path the Galileo spacecraft took to Jupiter. This path arrived nearly parallel to the planet’s motion. Right: One of the proposed paths to Uranus. This path will intersect the planet’s orbit at a much steeper angle to shorten the flight time. Click to enlarge. [Simon et al. 2026]

So it was no surprise when a panel of scientists and engineers charged with setting scientific exploration priorities between 2023 and 2032 recommended finally sending a spacecraft to Uranus, depositing it into orbit around the planet, and keeping it there for a while to collect data. The study itself suggested a basic design for the mission: a pair of spacecraft, one orbiter and one sacrificial atmospheric probe, collectively weighing about 4,000 kg.

Getting these spacecraft to their destination will be a challenge The thriftiest path to get to Uranus, a trajectory called a Hohmann transfer that’s been used for other missions aimed elsewhere in the solar system, would take 16–17 years. Rather than accept the long wait, the original authors suggested that the mission instead fly toward Jupiter, using the giant planet’s massive gravitational tug to slingshot the spacecraft toward Uranus.

However, this plan relied on Jupiter being in just the right place when the spacecraft approached. This in turn relied on the mission launching sometime in 2031 or 2032: any earlier or later, the slingshot would be aimed in the wrong direction. Now that timelines and budgets have slipped for this flagship mission, hitting this launch window seems unlikely. And, without the boost from Jupiter, the mission will have to cross 20 au of open interplanetary space on its own.

Solar Electric Propulsion to the Rescue

A 3-row figure showing the same interplanetary probe flanked by every-growing sets of solar panels.

Several proof-of-concept designs for the mission’s SEP components. How these designs would be packaged into a rocket fairing for launch is shown at right. Click to enlarge. [Simon et al. 2026]

Recently, a team led by Amy Simon, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, took on this challenge and tried to chart a new path through the solar system. The team realized that solar electric propulsion (SEP), a technique that relies on using solar panels to create electricity and accelerate ions to create thrust, might offer a path forward. By using SEP, the mission could leave Earth, unfurl wings of solar panels, then gradually accelerate for as long as there was enough sunlight to power the engine.

The power levels would likely get too low just a few astronomical units into their journey, but that would be enough: after discarding the SEP stage, the mission could coast to Uranus on a journey that would take only 13 years. Even better, this technology has a proven flight history and would require little maturation or development. The BepiColombo mission to Mercury is currently using SEP, and similar techniques are used on satellites in Earth orbit today.

Simon and collaborators also took on a number of other challenges that have cropped up since the mission was proposed, including fewer available plutonium power sources and a re-assessment of Uranus’s rings that revealed hazards in the original flight path. Their work brings the mission closer to the launch pad and illustrates how much iteration goes into the spacecraft that finally takes to the stars.

Citation

“Uranus Orbiter and Probe: Mission Challenges and Concept Updates Since the Origins, Worlds, and Life Decadal Survey,” Amy A. Simon et al 2026 Planet Sci. J. 7 143. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ae680c

Protoplanetary Disk

While previous investigations of planet formation across the universe’s history suggest that planets trickled into the picture, a recent study has found that primordial planetesimals could have formed much earlier from the insides of the first stars in the universe.

First Stars, First Planets?

When the first stars flickered on, the universe was filled with pristine gas, containing only hydrogen, helium, and a little lithium. This gas, though great at making massive stars known as Population III (Pop III) stars, was not yet enriched with the heavy elements necessary for planet formation and, of course, life. Past studies have suggested that planet formation in the universe was gradual, taking several billion years to peak after billions of stars created and spilled the needed metals into the universe. However, local pockets of enriched gas from Pop III stars could have created the right conditions for planet formation earlier in the universe’s history.

Pop III stars burned bright and fast, exploding violently in pair-instability supernovae that completely shredded the progenitor, ejecting over 100 solar masses of metals into their previously pristine surroundings. Cosmological simulations suggest that oxygen from these supernovae could have produced significant water fractions within the dense cores of the supernova remnant. This may have set the stage for planet formation in water-rich disks around subsequent generations of stars as early as 150–200 million years after the Big Bang — does numerical modeling support this planet formation hypothesis?

Protoplanetary disk growth

Simulation snapshots showing the formation and evolution of the protoplanetary disk for 13, 21, 30, 40, 50, and 60 thousands of years after protostellar birth. Click to enlarge. [Modified from Vorobyov et al 2026]

Primordial Planetesimals in Simulated Water-Rich Disks

To test if these water-rich dense cores within Pop III supernova remnants could form planetesimals, the building blocks of terrestrial planets, Eduard I. Vorobyov (University of Innsbruck; Southern Federal University) and collaborators performed numerical simulations tracing the collapse of one such gas core into a protoplanetary disk around a protostar. The simulations begin from the gravitational collapse of a 1-solar-mass gas cloud core, with a protostar emerging 24 thousand years after the initial cloud collapse. As the protostar’s gravity pulled in material from its surroundings, a rotating disk formed around the growing star.

Protoplanetary disk evolution and planetesimal growth

Simulation snapshot 40 thousand years after the formation of the protostar showing the gas, dust, and planetesimal surface densities and the dust-to-gas ratio. Click to enlarge. [Modified from Vorobyov et al 2026]

Tracking the gas and dust evolution in the disk, the authors found that several Earth masses of planetesimals formed within 0.5–1.0 au of the 0.4-solar-mass protostar. While the simulations did not trace the disk all the way to planet formation (this requires complex multi-body modeling and lots of computing power), enough planetesimals formed to create a Mars- or Earth-mass planet in the future. Luckily, unlike their live-fast and die-young predecessors, low-mass stars born from Pop III supernova remnants would still be burning hydrogen in their cores today, and ancient metal-poor stars in the Milky Way’s halo may be home to the universe’s first planets that could be detected in future exoplanet surveys. This study showed, for the first time, that water-rich protoplanetary disks with planetesimals could pop up billions of years earlier than previously thought, changing our understanding of planet formation in the universe.

Citation

“Planet Formation at Cosmic Dawn: Planetesimals in H2O-rich Disks around Low-mass Stars,” Eduard I. Vorobyov et al 2026 ApJL 1007 L51. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae907c

A photograph showing a fuzzy comet coma and some streaked stars alongside.

Astronomers have been measuring comets for centuries. But in December of last year, researchers collected a unique set of comet observations: they recorded some of the highest-quality data of one of the weirdest known comets while it was far from the Sun.

Simultaneous Spectra and Images

A few months after the famous interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS rounded the Sun and began its journey back into the space between the stars, a group of astronomers led by Nathan Roth (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center) aimed JWST in the direction of its retreat to watch it fade away. Using a special observing mode that leveraged the Integral Field Unit (IFU) in JWST’s Near Infrared Spectrometer, these observations didn’t result in just a single image of the comet, but a full stack of images, each corresponding to a different wavelength of light.

Using the IFU allowed the observers to combine the best of both regular imaging, which reveals spatial structure, and standard spectroscopy, which reveals wavelength dependencies. As a result, they could make spatially resolved maps of how the emission from the comet’s fuzzy atmosphere of gas and dust, or coma, changed with distance from the comet’s icy nucleus and angle to the Sun. Since different molecules radiate at different wavelengths, these maps in turn reveal the composition and geometry of 3I/ATLAS’s coma.

Mapping the Coma

A flux vs. wavelength plot showing a forest of narrow, well-resolved lines.

The spectrum of the coma of 3I/ATLAS. Note that this is a real spectrum, not a simulation. The contributions of various molecules are labeled alongside their most prominent emission lines. Click to enlarge. [Roth et al. 2026]

These maps, and the spectrum created by summing all of the spatial pixels together, reveal the comet’s coma in gorgeous detail, including hundreds of individual spectral lines that can be attributed to specific molecules. These maps revealed two unique features.

First, in contrast with normal solar system comets where water is the most abundant molecule, water was actually a secondary player here: there was significantly more carbon monoxide, or CO, than water in 3I/ATLAS’s coma. The researchers note that this might not be representative of the true distribution of the two species, but instead be the result of the timing of these observations. When observing a standard solar system comet, astronomers usually examine their targets when the object in question is within 2 au of the Sun. At these close distances, solar radiation is strong enough that water ice dominates the outgassing and activity in a coma.

However, these IFU measurements were taken when 3I/ATLAS was about 2.4 au from the Sun, or right in the transition region where water doesn’t sublimate as easily as CO or carbon dioxide (CO2). It’s likely that as the comet approaches the so-called “ice line” where water will naturally freeze out, CO will only increase its domination of the coma.

Top row: Maps of the distribution of various molecules in the coma. The white arrow shows the direction toward the Sun. Bottom row: The spatial distribution of the temperature of each species. Click to enlarge. [Roth et al. 2026]

Every Molecule for Itself

Second, each molecule seemed to be outgassing in its own unique direction from the coma. CO is leaving the nucleus in two different jets, one aimed directly back at the Sun and one perpendicular to it; CO2 and methane (CH4) are both leaking away in the anti-Sun direction; and water and methanol (CH3OH) are sublimating in nearly spherically symmetric shells. The authors speculate that these geometries may be caused by different “active sites” on the comet, and that had they observed the comet for one full rotational period, they might have seen these jets pointing in different directions.

Although 3I/ATLAS is now too far and faint for observations like these, this study reveals just how much we can learn in the brief time interstellar visitors spend in our solar system. When the fourth interstellar comet inevitably wanders through the inner solar system, astronomers will doubtless be ready to use this observing mode again.

Citation

“Coma Physics of an Interstellar Object: JWST Spatial-Spectral Mapping of 3I/ATLAS,” Nathan X. Roth et al 2026 ApJL 1005 L5. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae7443
ALMA observations of PDS 70

New research suggests that the circumplanetary disk surrounding the exoplanet PDS 70c contains a ring of dense dust, and the conditions within this ring may allow baby moons to form.

A Disk Within a Disk

closeup of PDS 70c's circumplanetary disk

A closeup of PDS 70c’s circumplanetary disk within PDS 70’s protoplanetary disk. [ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO)/Benisty et al.; CC BY 4.0]

The young star PDS 70 has become famous for its protoplanetary disk and its two growing giant planets, PDS 70b and PDS 70c. At least one of these planets is surrounded by a disk of its own; in 2019, researchers using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) reported the first-ever observation of a circumplanetary disk around PDS 70c, and later observations with ALMA brought clearer views of this disk.

There’s still debate over the exact source of the emission detected by ALMA. Does this emission come from dust, and if so, how is the dust distributed? Is the disk optically thick or optically thin? Does the emission even come from dust, or could it instead be free–free emission from unbound electrons navigating a charged-particle maze?

Dust Diagnosis

Yuhito Shibaike (Kagoshima University) and collaborators recently examined the hypothesis that the emission from PDS 70c’s circumplanetary disk arises from dust distributed in an optically thick ring. To test this hypothesis, the team explored two possible dust distributions, which they call “drift” and “ring.” In the drift model, dust grains within the circumplanetary disk migrate inward toward the planet, leaving much of the disk optically thin. Modeling suggests that this migration is typical in protoplanetary disks, and it might be common in circumplanetary disks as well.

plot of modeled dust distributions

Dust and gas surface density for the modeled disks in the drift (orange) and ring (blue) models. Click to enlarge. [Adapted from Shibaike et al. 2026]

In the ring model, the dust grains are concentrated within an optically thick ring at a certain distance from the planet. Simulations suggest that the formation of this type of dust ring is feasible, arising from a localized increase in gas density, outflows, or other causes.

Shibaike and coauthors found that the ring model naturally reproduced the observed spectral energy distribution for a range of reasonable parameters. The drift model, on the other hand, required an unrealistically high dust-to-gas ratio for the material accreted onto the circumplanetary disk from the parent protoplanetary disk to reproduce the observed spectral index.

Future Prospects and Moon-Making Possibilities

comparison of ALMA observations and model predictions

Comparison of ALMA observations (colored symbols) and model predictions (colored lines) from the drift (orange) and ring (blue) models. Click to enlarge. [Adapted from Shibaike et al. 2026]

This work demonstrated the feasibility of the dust-ring model, but it didn’t rule out a contribution due to free–free emission from unbound electrons, which has also been proposed to explain the disk’s appearance. The team noted that distinguishing between thermal dust emission and free–free emission is challenging with existing data, as the two sources produce spectral energy distributions with similar shapes.

Luckily, this likely won’t remain a mystery forever: the next-generation Very Large Array, which is anticipated to begin full science operations in the mid-2030s, should be able to resolve the location of the dust within the circumplanetary disk and illuminate the source of emission.

Finally, if the dust surrounding PDS 70c is concentrated within a ring, what does that mean for the possibility of moons forming within the disk? Shibaike and collaborators found that the conditions within the ring likely satisfy the requirements of both the streaming instability and the gravitational instability, which are required for dust grains to clump together and form the rocky building blocks of baby moons. Perhaps the PDS 70 system will one day be the site of not only a circumplanetary disk, but an exomoon as well!

Citation

“Interpreting ALMA Multiwavelength Continuum Observations of PDS 70 c: An Optically Thick Dust Ring in the Circumplanetary Disk,” Yuhito Shibaike et al 2026 ApJL 1006 L26. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae86f5

Epoch of Reionization

Exactly how the universe became reionized after cooling to form stars and galaxies remains an open question. A recent study investigates how a merging set of galaxies may have spurred an onslaught of ionizing photons into the intergalactic medium.

Lyman Continuum Leakers and Merging Galaxies

After its chaotic and blistering beginning, the universe cooled and began to coalesce, stars and galaxies flickering on to set the universe alight. From a few hundred million to about a billion years after the Big Bang, galaxies pumped high-energy ionizing Lyman continuum (LyC) photons into the intergalactic medium during what is known as the epoch of reionization. The exact mechanisms that produced and allowed LyC emission to escape galaxies during this era remain elusive.

Galaxy Merger

Hubble Space Telescope image of the interacting galaxy group Arp 194. The blue stream connecting the galaxies is where tidally stripped gas formed millions of new stars. [NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)]

One promising driver of LyC leakage is galaxy mergers — strong gravitational interactions and interstellar medium mixing can induce bursts of star formation, creating the hot, young stars that emit LyC photons. In particular, galaxy mergers can create tidal tails, streams of wispy gas, that can sustain brief but intense bouts of star formation that quickly use up surrounding gas. With no interstellar gas left to absorb radiation, the fresh stars in these streams can easily pump their high-energy photons into the intergalactic medium, contributing to cosmic reionization.

While observational studies have increasingly pointed to galaxy mergers as considerable drivers of LyC escape, only a small number have explicitly considered the role of mergers in the epoch of reionization due to spectral and spatial resolution limitations. Leveraging the high-resolution capabilities of JWST, Shengzhe Wang (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences) and collaborators performed detailed analyses of two LyC-leaker candidates to better understand the role of galaxy mergers in heating up the universe.

Confirming (and Refuting) Merger-Driven Leaks with JWST

Using candidate LyC leakers first identified in the LymAn Continuum Escape Survey (LACES) carried out with the Hubble Space Telescope, Wang and team obtained high-resolution JWST spectroscopy for two galaxies at redshift z = 3.1 (about 2 billion years after the Big Bang), LACES94460 and LACES104037. After carefully identifying and measuring emission lines in each candidate, the authors confirmed LACES104037 as a merger-driven LyC leaker. However, the apparent LyC emission from LACES94460 was determined to be contamination from a low-redshift object.

LACES 104037

Hubble and JWST observations of LACES104037. The top panels show the Hubble images (first two panels) and the JWST spectral observations (last three panels). The bottom panel shows a composite three-color image marking the location of two primary interacting galaxies and the LyC emission along with the associated spectra. Click to enlarge. [Wang et al 2026]

Based on the JWST spectroscopy, LACES104037 is an early-stage merger system with two primary interacting galaxies (LACES104037-bulk and LACES104037s) with a tidal-tail structure connecting them (LACES104037-LyC) where the LyC emission originates. Using model predictions based on the JWST spectroscopy and photometry from previous studies, the team found that LACES104037-LyC is a star-forming clump in a tidal tail with a stellar age of about 5 million years and an extreme LyC photon escape fraction of approximately 0.99. This points to merger-induced star formation being an extremely efficient way to dump ionizing photons into the intergalactic medium.

LACES104037-LyC represents the first confirmed LyC leaker of its kind: an external clump of star formation in a tidal tail. This discovery aids in our understanding of how mergers can drive high-energy photon emission, and highlights the critical role galaxy mergers may play in the epoch of reionization. Future high-resolution observations will hopefully reveal more knots of LyC-leaking stars within merging galaxies and provide a deeper understanding of this important evolutionary phase of the universe.

Citation

“Confirmation and Refutation of Lyman Continuum Leakers at z ~ 3 with JWST NIRSpec IFU,” Shengzhe Wang et al 2026 ApJL 1006 L17. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae8523

illustration of WASP-121b

Ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-121b is once again puzzling astronomers. New JWST observations have revealed aspects of this superheated planet’s atmosphere that models cannot yet explain.

An Extreme Planet

Among the more than 6,000 known exoplanets, there are many types of worlds that aren’t represented in our solar system. The most exotic and unfamiliar planets might be the ultra-hot Jupiters: giant planets nestled so close to their host stars that they are tidally locked, with temperatures on their permanently starlit sides climbing to thousands of degrees.

WASP-121b, which circles its F-dwarf host star every 30.5 hours, is one of the best-studied ultra-hot Jupiters. Previous work has started to reveal the complexity of its atmosphere, and now, data from JWST have opened a new window onto WASP-121b’s behavior.

New View from JWST

representation of an exoplanet's phase curve

A representation of an exoplanet’s phase curve. Click to enlarge. [ESA]

To learn more about WASP-121b’s atmosphere, Robert C. Frazier (University of Michigan) and collaborators analyzed JWST Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph (NIRISS) observations covering more than one full orbit of the planet. These observations allowed them to construct the system’s phase curve, which describes the total amount of emitted and reflected light from the planet and its host star over an entire orbit.

The team used two 3D general circulation models to predict the planet’s atmospheric structure and extract synthetic spectra and phase curves to compare against the JWST observations. Using nine model configurations in total, the team varied several inputs, including sources of atmospheric opacity, sources of atmospheric drag, and assumptions about whether clouds are able to form on the planet’s cooler nightside.

Left with a Mystery

Frazier and collaborators found two aspects of WASP-121b’s phase curve that their models couldn’t explain: the planet emits less light overall than predicted, and the location of its phase-curve offset changes with wavelength.

phase curve of WASP-121b

Modeled phase curves, shown as the flux of the planet divided by the flux of the star, for WASP-121b (colored solid and dotted lines) compared to the best fit to the JWST observations (black line). Click to enlarge. [Frazier et al. 2026]

The models predict, on average, 12–15% more emission from the planet than observed. This discrepancy might be traced back to how the planet’s radius is determined, which is a simple-sounding task that can be deceptively difficult; WASP-121b isn’t perfectly spherical, and its emitting area changes with wavelength, making it challenging to normalize the planet’s radius for use in models.

The phase-curve offset is the difference between a planet’s sub-stellar point (where the star is directly overhead) and the brightest point in the planet’s atmosphere. In general, some degree of offset is expected because planetary winds tend to whisk heat away from the sub-stellar point, placing the brightest point somewhere to the east (usually). For WASP-121b, the offset is unexpectedly small — suggesting a source of drag in the atmosphere that prevents winds from transporting heat away from the sub-stellar point — and it’s larger at shorter wavelengths. This wavelength dependence isn’t predicted by any of the models, and it’s not clear what causes it.

These results demonstrate something remarkable: that our observations of a planet nearly 900 light-years away have become so precise that they’re pushing our already complex models to include more physics — an exceptionally exciting motivation for model improvement!

Citation

“The Days Drag On on WASP-121 b: Interpreting Its NIRISS Spectroscopic Phase Curve with General Circulation Models,” Robert C. Frazier et al 2026 ApJ 1004 102. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae69ca

galaxy UGC 5189A, host of the supernova SN 2010jl

In 2010, the supernova SN 2010jl illuminated a corner of a small, irregular galaxy 150 million light-years away. More than a decade later, researchers have found evidence that this collapsing massive star has created a significant amount of cosmic dust.

Superluminous Supernova

SN 2010jl in its host galaxy

This X-ray and optical image shows SN 2010jl in its host galaxy. The supernova is the brightest X-ray source, near the top of the galaxy. [X-ray: NASA/CXC/Royal Military College of Canada/P.Chandra et al); Optical: NASA/STScI]

From high-redshift galaxies to nearby star-forming regions, it’s clear that the universe is a dusty place — but where does all this dust come from? Core-collapse supernovae are one possible source. These cataclysms fling enriched material into interstellar space, where dust grains coalesce out of the cooling ejecta. This is a promising explanation for dust in high-redshift galaxies, which require more rapid dust production than other sources, like evolved low- to intermediate-mass stars, can provide.

SN 2010jl offers an excellent chance to study the dust-forming potential of core-collapse supernovae. This supernova was unusually luminous because of intense interactions between the expanding supernova shock and the dense material surrounding the exploding star, and it’s possible that these types of interactions spur the creation of dust. In the first few years after the supernova was discovered, researchers found evidence that it had produced new dust. What has it been up to since?

SN 2010jl dust mass over time

SN 2010jl’s inferred dust mass over time (black stars) compared to other supernovae. Click to enlarge. [Smith et al. 2026]

Checking Back In

Thirteen years after SN 2010jl was discovered, Nathan Smith (Steward Observatory) and collaborators checked in on its dust production. The team collected new ground-based optical spectra from the Keck I telescope and the MMT Observatory and mid-infrared spectra from JWST. The optical spectra — among the latest collected for any superluminous supernova — show numerous narrow emission lines that indicate that the expanding supernova continues to interact with its surroundings.

In the JWST observations, SN 2010jl is the brightest mid-infrared point source in its host galaxy. Through spectral energy distribution modeling, Smith and coauthors found that the brilliant infrared emission is likely due to a shroud of warm dust totaling roughly 20% of the mass of the Sun. This is about 80 times more dust than inferred from observations made a decade earlier.

Where’s the Dust?

diagram of a supernova's shocks

Diagram showing the outward-moving forward shock and inward-moving reverse shock of a supernova that is interacting with the interstellar medium (ISM). The post-shock region is located between the two shocks and contains shocked ejecta as well as shocked interstellar material. Click to enlarge. [AAS Nova/Kerry Hensley]

While these data appear to tell the tale of a prolific dust-producing supernova, interpreting these results isn’t straightforward — at a distance of 150 million light-years, it’s difficult to pin down the exact location of the dust. If the dust formed in the supernova ejecta that has not yet withstood the passage of the reverse shock, that dust might be destroyed when it passes through the shock. It’s also possible that the emission comes from preexisting dust in the interstellar medium that was destroyed by the passage of the supernova shock, then re-formed as the material cooled. If instead the dust formed in the post-shock region (between the outward-moving forward shock and the inward-moving reverse shock), it should survive and become incorporated into the interstellar medium.

While it’s not possible to rule out the other options entirely, Smith and collaborators argue that at least some of the dust can be traced to new growth in the post-shock region. Because post-shock dust grains are likely to reach the interstellar medium, this suggests that superluminous, strongly interacting supernovae like SN 2010jl are a viable source of dust in the present-day universe and in high-redshift galaxies alike.

Citation

“JWST Spectra Indicate a Large Mass of Postshock Dust Formed by SN 2010jl,” Nathan Smith et al 2026 ApJ 1006 224. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae74c5

A rendering of a small star surrounded by a ring of gas and some larger asteroids.

Only one white dwarf star has ever been caught eating an asteroid. Recently, however, astronomers may have found another that just finished its meal.

Eating Asteroids

Although stars like our Sun don’t explode in violent supernovae like their massive counterparts, they don’t slink quietly into a peaceful old age either. When a solar-mass star reaches the end of its main sequence life, it first swells dramatically (the Sun may eventually grow so large that it consumes Earth and the device you’re reading this on), then shrinks down to a tiny but incredibly hot ember known as a white dwarf.

A rendering of an asteroid with large cracks and a tail of dust.

An artist’s impression of an asteroid breaking up near a white dwarf star. [NASA, ESA, M.A. Garlick (space-art.co.uk), University of Warwick, and University of Cambridge]

As one might imagine, this process is not kind to any planets or asteroids that were previously circling the star. While some might survive, others are sent spiraling inwards where they break apart and are accreted onto their hosts. Due to the extreme temperatures and surface gravity of white dwarfs, whatever falls on their surfaces is vaporized, sorted by weight, and quickly dragged out of sight. Since heavy elements cannot last long in a white dwarf’s atmosphere, whenever astronomers see their stains in the star’s spectrum, they know that the star must have recently consumed the rocky remains of their former asteroids and planets.

However, although researchers have found these stains in over a quarter of white dwarfs and consequently have reasoned that asteroid snacking must be common, they’ve only ever caught one star mid-meal. Recently, Ben Zuckerman (University of California, Los Angeles) and a team of collaborators may have found another, though it may have just finished dining.

Leftover Crumbs

A time vs. flux plot showing a flat trend.

The light curve of WD J0234-0406 measured by the Zwicky Transient Facility. Unlike WD 1145+017, which frequently changes brightness, this white dwarf appears remarkably steady despite the high-velocity gas surrounding it. [B. Zuckerman et al. 2026]

This new star, called WD J0234-0406, shares some characteristics with the “iconic” WD 1145+017 that was first spotted mid-meal, but it also differs in an interesting way. High-resolution spectroscopy reveals that both stars have gaseous material orbiting around them along highly non-circular paths. These have been interpreted as “precessing rings of high velocity gas” that previously belonged to parent asteroids. However, while WD 1145+017 appears to flicker as bits of disintegrating asteroids pass between it and our line of sight, WD J0234-0406 is rock steady. Neither TESS nor the Zwicky Transient Facility have detected any dips in light from the star despite the evidence that solid material must have recently drizzled into the star’s atmosphere.

The researchers suggest that this relative quiet is a matter of timing. While asteroids are actively breaking up around WD 1145+017, the parent bodies that supplied the gas and dust around WD J0234-0406 may have shattered long ago and have already been either vaporized or ground down into smaller particles. All that is left over are the crumbs slowly spiraling toward the star.

Although WD J0234-0406’s meal may not be as dramatic as WD 1145+017’s feast, it’s still exciting to expand the sample of known white dwarf-asteroid interactions. And, with the upcoming release of data from the DESI survey poised to reveal the spectra of tens of thousands of white dwarfs, the sample is likely to grow again soon.

Citation

“High-velocity Circumstellar Gas Orbiting a White Dwarf Star,” B. Zuckerman et al 2026 ApJ 1004 254. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae23c4

The cosmic web

Even the darkest corners of the universe are not completely empty. A recent study has used fast radio bursts to provide the first estimate of the baryon content in cosmic voids.

What’s in a Void?

Cosmological studies have revealed the large-scale filamentary structure of the universe known as the cosmic web. Chains of galaxies and galaxy clusters fall into spindly strands (or filaments) of matter overdensities, opening up cavernous cosmic voids that comprise the darkest corners of the universe. These seemingly vacant voids serve as critical test beds for cosmology, allowing researchers to constrain things like the nature of dark energy and the matter density of the universe.

Despite their name, voids are not completely empty but are instead underdensities with considerably less matter compared to the bustling filaments they border. The baryon (normal matter) content of cosmic voids has important implications for cosmological models and large-scale galactic feedback processes, but assessing how many baryons actually occupy voids has only recently become observationally accessible.

FRB and void sky maps

Sky maps centered on the north celestial pole showing the CHIME fast radio burst sample (top) and the SDSS void catalog (bottom). [Sharma et al 2026]

Fast radio bursts — brief, intense flashes of radio waves emitted by compact objects — have proven to be versatile tools for measuring both underdensities and overdensities throughout the universe. The dispersion measure of fast radio bursts, which tells us how many free electrons fall between the radio emitter and observer, can be directly used to map the baryon content along the lines of sight. Fast radio burst sight lines passing through overdensities will produce a dispersion measure excess, and those passing through underdensities will produce a dispersion measure deficit relative to the cosmic mean. Thus far, fast radio bursts have been used extensively to study overdense galaxy and cluster filaments, but their sensitivity to underdense regions like voids has yet to be explored.

Chiming In on the Baryon Search

In concept, directly stacking fast radio burst sight lines that coincide with the positions of known cosmic voids provides a direct measurement of the baryon underdensity inside voids. With no previous observational exploration of this quantity, Kritti Sharma (California Institute of Technology) and collaborators leveraged the second catalog of the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment Fast Radio Bursts (CHIME/FRB) sample in conjunction with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) void catalog to provide the first observational assessment of the baryon underdensity in cosmic voids.

Anticorrelations between FRB dispersion measures and void positions

Anticorrelations between fast radio burst dispersion measures and void positions. There is a clear dispersion measure deficit closer to voids centers. [Sharma et al 2026]

Stacking thousands of fast radio burst sight lines that spatially align with thousands of known voids, the authors measured a statistically significant dispersion measure deficit toward void centers. This deficit indicates that, as theory predicts, baryons inhabit cosmic voids at a suppressed level. The team used cosmological models to quantify the electron density contrast between the interior and exterior of voids, finding an approximate baryon underdensity of 60% ± 30% relative to the cosmic mean. Combining this result with existing thermal scattering measurements of the cosmic microwave background, the authors estimated a mean void gas temperature of about 1.1 million kelvin — voids are occupied by a suppressed amount of warm-hot diffuse gas.

This study provides a unique approach to baryon mapping and opens up the door for future investigation of cosmic voids. While not physically containing much, voids hold vast astrophysical and cosmological significance. With the astronomical stage primed with galaxy-mapping powerhouses like the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, Vera Rubin Observatory, Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, and Euclid Space Telescope, cosmic voids will become a cornerstone of cosmological studies.

Citation

“Baryons in the Darkest Sites of the Universe,” Kritti Sharma et al 2026 ApJL 1006 L3. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae81ac

240P

Traversing through the solar system, a comet split in two, and a recent study used six months of observations to investigate when and why.

A Split Comet

Orbit map

Orbital path of 240P/NEAT (purple) and the position of the comet on 30 July 2026 (light blue teardrop). Click to enlarge. [TheSkyLive]

While we often think of comets as icy remnants of the solar system’s formation that populate the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud, some comets make their homes closer to the Sun. One such class, known as Jupiter-family comets, traveled from the Kuiper Belt to short orbital periods (less than 20 years) whose paths through the solar system are shaped by Jupiter’s gravity. Discovered in 2002, 240P/NEAT is a Jupiter-family comet that loops between Jupiter and Mars on a 7.6-year orbit. Making close approaches to Jupiter, 240P experiences frequent, strong interactions with the gas giant that can alter the comet’s orbit and cause sudden bursts in brightness as ice and dust are heated and outgassed from the comet’s surface.

Most recently, 240P swept closest to Jupiter in July 2007, shifting the comet’s perihelion distance (closest approach to the Sun) from 2.5 to 2.1 au, and several long-lived bursts in brightness in 2018/2019 could have been spurred by this orbital shift. Excitingly, a fainter comoving object, 240P-B, was first reported in June 2025 as the comet headed toward perihelion — at some point recently, 240P had split in two!

Over the last century, numerous split comets have been recorded, but detailed physical studies of these objects are rare. With growing evidence suggesting splitting and disintegration are the primary mechanisms of comet destruction, understanding the properties and cause of 240P’s split is imperative.

Observing 240P

With 240P on the move to perihelion, David Jewitt (University of California, Los Angeles) and collaborators monitored the comet from October 2025 to April 2026 to establish the likely cause of its split. Employing the Alhambra Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera on the 2.56-meter Nordic Optical Telescope, the authors obtained detailed imaging of the comet from two months before to four months after perihelion to characterize both components.

Tracking both photometric and morphological changes across their observations, the authors estimated the dust-loss rates, physical sizes, and separation speed of 240P-A and 240P-B. The brighter component, 240P-A, has an estimated radius between 400 and 600 meters and a dust-loss rate almost four times higher than 240P-B. Because 240P-B is fainter, its radius is harder to constrain observationally. From its lower dust-loss rate and lower brightness, the authors estimated a radius around 300 meters (and no smaller than 50). Based on how the separation of the two comet pieces changes over time, the authors determined that the split of 240P occurred at least three years before their observations.

dust mass-loss

Dust mass-loss rates for 240P-A (green circles) and 240P-B (yellow diamonds) over the course of the observations. Both components peak shortly before perihelion (dashed vertical line). Click to enlarge. [Jewitt et al 2026]

Source of the Split

How exactly did this fragmented comet get this way? The authors considered a number of comet-splitting mechanisms: tidal forces, asteroid impact, pressure buildup below the comet’s surface, thermal stresses, and rotational instability. Given the comet’s orbit, it has not had close enough encounters with the Sun or other planets for tidal forces to be the culprit, and it traverses well above the asteroid belt, avoiding collisions. Pressure buildup and thermal stresses can fracture comets, but both are unlikely to launch such a large fragment as seen in this system.

This leaves rotational instability as the likely source of 240P’s split. Outgassing torques lead to rotational instability, especially in subkilometer comets like 240P, and 240P has exhibited recent outgassing. In addition, the separation speed between the 240P components is comparable to the escape speed of the primary comet, which is expected for rotational breakup. To confirm this hypothesis, future observations measuring the rotation period of 240P are necessary, but this study adds to the small number of split-comet observations that aid in understanding comet destruction.

Citation

“Investigation of Split Comet 240P/NEAT,” David Jewitt et al AJ 172 113. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae83ac

1 2 3 … 122