Features RSS

Epoch of Reionization

Exactly how the universe became reionized after cooling to form stars and galaxies remains an open question. A recent study investigates how a merging set of galaxies may have spurred an onslaught of ionizing photons into the intergalactic medium.

Lyman Continuum Leakers and Merging Galaxies

After its chaotic and blistering beginning, the universe cooled and began to coalesce, stars and galaxies flickering on to set the universe alight. From a few hundred million to about a billion years after the Big Bang, galaxies pumped high-energy ionizing Lyman continuum (LyC) photons into the intergalactic medium during what is known as the epoch of reionization. The exact mechanisms that produced and allowed LyC emission to escape galaxies during this era remain elusive.

Galaxy Merger

Hubble Space Telescope image of the interacting galaxy group Arp 194. The blue stream connecting the galaxies is where tidally stripped gas formed millions of new stars. [NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)]

One promising driver of LyC leakage is galaxy mergers — strong gravitational interactions and interstellar medium mixing can induce bursts of star formation, creating the hot, young stars that emit LyC photons. In particular, galaxy mergers can create tidal tails, streams of wispy gas, that can sustain brief but intense bouts of star formation that quickly use up surrounding gas. With no interstellar gas left to absorb radiation, the fresh stars in these streams can easily pump their high-energy photons into the intergalactic medium, contributing to cosmic reionization.

While observational studies have increasingly pointed to galaxy mergers as considerable drivers of LyC escape, only a small number have explicitly considered the role of mergers in the epoch of reionization due to spectral and spatial resolution limitations. Leveraging the high-resolution capabilities of JWST, Shengzhe Wang (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences) and collaborators performed detailed analyses of two LyC-leaker candidates to better understand the role of galaxy mergers in heating up the universe.

Confirming (and Refuting) Merger-Driven Leaks with JWST

Using candidate LyC leakers first identified in the LymAn Continuum Escape Survey (LACES) carried out with the Hubble Space Telescope, Wang and team obtained high-resolution JWST spectroscopy for two galaxies at redshift z = 3.1 (about 2 billion years after the Big Bang), LACES94460 and LACES104037. After carefully identifying and measuring emission lines in each candidate, the authors confirmed LACES104037 as a merger-driven LyC leaker. However, the apparent LyC emission from LACES94460 was determined to be contamination from a low-redshift object.

LACES 104037

Hubble and JWST observations of LACES104037. The top panels show the Hubble images (first two panels) and the JWST spectral observations (last three panels). The bottom panel shows a composite three-color image marking the location of two primary interacting galaxies and the LyC emission along with the associated spectra. Click to enlarge. [Wang et al 2026]

Based on the JWST spectroscopy, LACES104037 is an early-stage merger system with two primary interacting galaxies (LACES104037-bulk and LACES104037s) with a tidal-tail structure connecting them (LACES104037-LyC) where the LyC emission originates. Using model predictions based on the JWST spectroscopy and photometry from previous studies, the team found that LACES104037-LyC is a star-forming clump in a tidal tail with a stellar age of about 5 million years and an extreme LyC photon escape fraction of approximately 0.99. This points to merger-induced star formation being an extremely efficient way to dump ionizing photons into the intergalactic medium.

LACES104037-LyC represents the first confirmed LyC leaker of its kind: an external clump of star formation in a tidal tail. This discovery aids in our understanding of how mergers can drive high-energy photon emission, and highlights the critical role galaxy mergers may play in the epoch of reionization. Future high-resolution observations will hopefully reveal more knots of LyC-leaking stars within merging galaxies and provide a deeper understanding of this important evolutionary phase of the universe.

Citation

“Confirmation and Refutation of Lyman Continuum Leakers at z ~ 3 with JWST NIRSpec IFU,” Shengzhe Wang et al 2026 ApJL 1006 L17. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae8523

illustration of WASP-121b

Ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-121b is once again puzzling astronomers. New JWST observations have revealed aspects of this superheated planet’s atmosphere that models cannot yet explain.

An Extreme Planet

Among the more than 6,000 known exoplanets, there are many types of worlds that aren’t represented in our solar system. The most exotic and unfamiliar planets might be the ultra-hot Jupiters: giant planets nestled so close to their host stars that they are tidally locked, with temperatures on their permanently starlit sides climbing to thousands of degrees.

WASP-121b, which circles its F-dwarf host star every 30.5 hours, is one of the best-studied ultra-hot Jupiters. Previous work has started to reveal the complexity of its atmosphere, and now, data from JWST have opened a new window onto WASP-121b’s behavior.

New View from JWST

representation of an exoplanet's phase curve

A representation of an exoplanet’s phase curve. Click to enlarge. [ESA]

To learn more about WASP-121b’s atmosphere, Robert C. Frazier (University of Michigan) and collaborators analyzed JWST Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph (NIRISS) observations covering more than one full orbit of the planet. These observations allowed them to construct the system’s phase curve, which describes the total amount of emitted and reflected light from the planet and its host star over an entire orbit.

The team used two 3D general circulation models to predict the planet’s atmospheric structure and extract synthetic spectra and phase curves to compare against the JWST observations. Using nine model configurations in total, the team varied several inputs, including sources of atmospheric opacity, sources of atmospheric drag, and assumptions about whether clouds are able to form on the planet’s cooler nightside.

Left with a Mystery

Frazier and collaborators found two aspects of WASP-121b’s phase curve that their models couldn’t explain: the planet emits less light overall than predicted, and the location of its phase-curve offset changes with wavelength.

phase curve of WASP-121b

Modeled phase curves, shown as the flux of the planet divided by the flux of the star, for WASP-121b (colored solid and dotted lines) compared to the best fit to the JWST observations (black line). Click to enlarge. [Frazier et al. 2026]

The models predict, on average, 12–15% more emission from the planet than observed. This discrepancy might be traced back to how the planet’s radius is determined, which is a simple-sounding task that can be deceptively difficult; WASP-121b isn’t perfectly spherical, and its emitting area changes with wavelength, making it challenging to normalize the planet’s radius for use in models.

The phase-curve offset is the difference between a planet’s sub-stellar point (where the star is directly overhead) and the brightest point in the planet’s atmosphere. In general, some degree of offset is expected because planetary winds tend to whisk heat away from the sub-stellar point, placing the brightest point somewhere to the east (usually). For WASP-121b, the offset is unexpectedly small — suggesting a source of drag in the atmosphere that prevents winds from transporting heat away from the sub-stellar point — and it’s larger at shorter wavelengths. This wavelength dependence isn’t predicted by any of the models, and it’s not clear what causes it.

These results demonstrate something remarkable: that our observations of a planet nearly 900 light-years away have become so precise that they’re pushing our already complex models to include more physics — an exceptionally exciting motivation for model improvement!

Citation

“The Days Drag On on WASP-121 b: Interpreting Its NIRISS Spectroscopic Phase Curve with General Circulation Models,” Robert C. Frazier et al 2026 ApJ 1004 102. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae69ca

galaxy UGC 5189A, host of the supernova SN 2010jl

In 2010, the supernova SN 2010jl illuminated a corner of a small, irregular galaxy 150 million light-years away. More than a decade later, researchers have found evidence that this collapsing massive star has created a significant amount of cosmic dust.

Superluminous Supernova

SN 2010jl in its host galaxy

This X-ray and optical image shows SN 2010jl in its host galaxy. The supernova is the brightest X-ray source, near the top of the galaxy. [X-ray: NASA/CXC/Royal Military College of Canada/P.Chandra et al); Optical: NASA/STScI]

From high-redshift galaxies to nearby star-forming regions, it’s clear that the universe is a dusty place — but where does all this dust come from? Core-collapse supernovae are one possible source. These cataclysms fling enriched material into interstellar space, where dust grains coalesce out of the cooling ejecta. This is a promising explanation for dust in high-redshift galaxies, which require more rapid dust production than other sources, like evolved low- to intermediate-mass stars, can provide.

SN 2010jl offers an excellent chance to study the dust-forming potential of core-collapse supernovae. This supernova was unusually luminous because of intense interactions between the expanding supernova shock and the dense material surrounding the exploding star, and it’s possible that these types of interactions spur the creation of dust. In the first few years after the supernova was discovered, researchers found evidence that it had produced new dust. What has it been up to since?

SN 2010jl dust mass over time

SN 2010jl’s inferred dust mass over time (black stars) compared to other supernovae. Click to enlarge. [Smith et al. 2026]

Checking Back In

Thirteen years after SN 2010jl was discovered, Nathan Smith (Steward Observatory) and collaborators checked in on its dust production. The team collected new ground-based optical spectra from the Keck I telescope and the MMT Observatory and mid-infrared spectra from JWST. The optical spectra — among the latest collected for any superluminous supernova — show numerous narrow emission lines that indicate that the expanding supernova continues to interact with its surroundings.

In the JWST observations, SN 2010jl is the brightest mid-infrared point source in its host galaxy. Through spectral energy distribution modeling, Smith and coauthors found that the brilliant infrared emission is likely due to a shroud of warm dust totaling roughly 20% of the mass of the Sun. This is about 80 times more dust than inferred from observations made a decade earlier.

Where’s the Dust?

diagram of a supernova's shocks

Diagram showing the outward-moving forward shock and inward-moving reverse shock of a supernova that is interacting with the interstellar medium (ISM). The post-shock region is located between the two shocks and contains shocked ejecta as well as shocked interstellar material. Click to enlarge. [AAS Nova/Kerry Hensley]

While these data appear to tell the tale of a prolific dust-producing supernova, interpreting these results isn’t straightforward — at a distance of 150 million light-years, it’s difficult to pin down the exact location of the dust. If the dust formed in the supernova ejecta that has not yet withstood the passage of the reverse shock, that dust might be destroyed when it passes through the shock. It’s also possible that the emission comes from preexisting dust in the interstellar medium that was destroyed by the passage of the supernova shock, then re-formed as the material cooled. If instead the dust formed in the post-shock region (between the outward-moving forward shock and the inward-moving reverse shock), it should survive and become incorporated into the interstellar medium.

While it’s not possible to rule out the other options entirely, Smith and collaborators argue that at least some of the dust can be traced to new growth in the post-shock region. Because post-shock dust grains are likely to reach the interstellar medium, this suggests that superluminous, strongly interacting supernovae like SN 2010jl are a viable source of dust in the present-day universe and in high-redshift galaxies alike.

Citation

“JWST Spectra Indicate a Large Mass of Postshock Dust Formed by SN 2010jl,” Nathan Smith et al 2026 ApJ 1006 224. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae74c5

A rendering of a small star surrounded by a ring of gas and some larger asteroids.

Only one white dwarf star has ever been caught eating an asteroid. Recently, however, astronomers may have found another that just finished its meal.

Eating Asteroids

Although stars like our Sun don’t explode in violent supernovae like their massive counterparts, they don’t slink quietly into a peaceful old age either. When a solar-mass star reaches the end of its main sequence life, it first swells dramatically (the Sun may eventually grow so large that it consumes Earth and the device you’re reading this on), then shrinks down to a tiny but incredibly hot ember known as a white dwarf.

A rendering of an asteroid with large cracks and a tail of dust.

An artist’s impression of an asteroid breaking up near a white dwarf star. [NASA, ESA, M.A. Garlick (space-art.co.uk), University of Warwick, and University of Cambridge]

As one might imagine, this process is not kind to any planets or asteroids that were previously circling the star. While some might survive, others are sent spiraling inwards where they break apart and are accreted onto their hosts. Due to the extreme temperatures and surface gravity of white dwarfs, whatever falls on their surfaces is vaporized, sorted by weight, and quickly dragged out of sight. Since heavy elements cannot last long in a white dwarf’s atmosphere, whenever astronomers see their stains in the star’s spectrum, they know that the star must have recently consumed the rocky remains of their former asteroids and planets.

However, although researchers have found these stains in over a quarter of white dwarfs and consequently have reasoned that asteroid snacking must be common, they’ve only ever caught one star mid-meal. Recently, Ben Zuckerman (University of California, Los Angeles) and a team of collaborators may have found another, though it may have just finished dining.

Leftover Crumbs

A time vs. flux plot showing a flat trend.

The light curve of WD J0234-0406 measured by the Zwicky Transient Facility. Unlike WD 1145+017, which frequently changes brightness, this white dwarf appears remarkably steady despite the high-velocity gas surrounding it. [B. Zuckerman et al. 2026]

This new star, called WD J0234-0406, shares some characteristics with the “iconic” WD 1145+017 that was first spotted mid-meal, but it also differs in an interesting way. High-resolution spectroscopy reveals that both stars have gaseous material orbiting around them along highly non-circular paths. These have been interpreted as “precessing rings of high velocity gas” that previously belonged to parent asteroids. However, while WD 1145+017 appears to flicker as bits of disintegrating asteroids pass between it and our line of sight, WD J0234-0406 is rock steady. Neither TESS nor the Zwicky Transient Facility have detected any dips in light from the star despite the evidence that solid material must have recently drizzled into the star’s atmosphere.

The researchers suggest that this relative quiet is a matter of timing. While asteroids are actively breaking up around WD 1145+017, the parent bodies that supplied the gas and dust around WD J0234-0406 may have shattered long ago and have already been either vaporized or ground down into smaller particles. All that is left over are the crumbs slowly spiraling toward the star.

Although WD J0234-0406’s meal may not be as dramatic as WD 1145+017’s feast, it’s still exciting to expand the sample of known white dwarf-asteroid interactions. And, with the upcoming release of data from the DESI survey poised to reveal the spectra of tens of thousands of white dwarfs, the sample is likely to grow again soon.

Citation

“High-velocity Circumstellar Gas Orbiting a White Dwarf Star,” B. Zuckerman et al 2026 ApJ 1004 254. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae23c4

The cosmic web

Even the darkest corners of the universe are not completely empty. A recent study has used fast radio bursts to provide the first estimate of the baryon content in cosmic voids.

What’s in a Void?

Cosmological studies have revealed the large-scale filamentary structure of the universe known as the cosmic web. Chains of galaxies and galaxy clusters fall into spindly strands (or filaments) of matter overdensities, opening up cavernous cosmic voids that comprise the darkest corners of the universe. These seemingly vacant voids serve as critical test beds for cosmology, allowing researchers to constrain things like the nature of dark energy and the matter density of the universe.

Despite their name, voids are not completely empty but are instead underdensities with considerably less matter compared to the bustling filaments they border. The baryon (normal matter) content of cosmic voids has important implications for cosmological models and large-scale galactic feedback processes, but assessing how many baryons actually occupy voids has only recently become observationally accessible.

FRB and void sky maps

Sky maps centered on the north celestial pole showing the CHIME fast radio burst sample (top) and the SDSS void catalog (bottom). [Sharma et al 2026]

Fast radio bursts — brief, intense flashes of radio waves emitted by compact objects — have proven to be versatile tools for measuring both underdensities and overdensities throughout the universe. The dispersion measure of fast radio bursts, which tells us how many free electrons fall between the radio emitter and observer, can be directly used to map the baryon content along the lines of sight. Fast radio burst sight lines passing through overdensities will produce a dispersion measure excess, and those passing through underdensities will produce a dispersion measure deficit relative to the cosmic mean. Thus far, fast radio bursts have been used extensively to study overdense galaxy and cluster filaments, but their sensitivity to underdense regions like voids has yet to be explored.

Chiming In on the Baryon Search

In concept, directly stacking fast radio burst sight lines that coincide with the positions of known cosmic voids provides a direct measurement of the baryon underdensity inside voids. With no previous observational exploration of this quantity, Kritti Sharma (California Institute of Technology) and collaborators leveraged the second catalog of the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment Fast Radio Bursts (CHIME/FRB) sample in conjunction with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) void catalog to provide the first observational assessment of the baryon underdensity in cosmic voids.

Anticorrelations between FRB dispersion measures and void positions

Anticorrelations between fast radio burst dispersion measures and void positions. There is a clear dispersion measure deficit closer to voids centers. [Sharma et al 2026]

Stacking thousands of fast radio burst sight lines that spatially align with thousands of known voids, the authors measured a statistically significant dispersion measure deficit toward void centers. This deficit indicates that, as theory predicts, baryons inhabit cosmic voids at a suppressed level. The team used cosmological models to quantify the electron density contrast between the interior and exterior of voids, finding an approximate baryon underdensity of 60% ± 30% relative to the cosmic mean. Combining this result with existing thermal scattering measurements of the cosmic microwave background, the authors estimated a mean void gas temperature of about 1.1 million kelvin — voids are occupied by a suppressed amount of warm-hot diffuse gas.

This study provides a unique approach to baryon mapping and opens up the door for future investigation of cosmic voids. While not physically containing much, voids hold vast astrophysical and cosmological significance. With the astronomical stage primed with galaxy-mapping powerhouses like the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, Vera Rubin Observatory, Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, and Euclid Space Telescope, cosmic voids will become a cornerstone of cosmological studies.

Citation

“Baryons in the Darkest Sites of the Universe,” Kritti Sharma et al 2026 ApJL 1006 L3. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae81ac

240P

Traversing through the solar system, a comet split in two, and a recent study used six months of observations to investigate when and why.

A Split Comet

Orbit map

Orbital path of 240P/NEAT (purple) and the position of the comet on 30 July 2026 (light blue teardrop). Click to enlarge. [TheSkyLive]

While we often think of comets as icy remnants of the solar system’s formation that populate the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud, some comets make their homes closer to the Sun. One such class, known as Jupiter-family comets, traveled from the Kuiper Belt to short orbital periods (less than 20 years) whose paths through the solar system are shaped by Jupiter’s gravity. Discovered in 2002, 240P/NEAT is a Jupiter-family comet that loops between Jupiter and Mars on a 7.6-year orbit. Making close approaches to Jupiter, 240P experiences frequent, strong interactions with the gas giant that can alter the comet’s orbit and cause sudden bursts in brightness as ice and dust are heated and outgassed from the comet’s surface.

Most recently, 240P swept closest to Jupiter in July 2007, shifting the comet’s perihelion distance (closest approach to the Sun) from 2.5 to 2.1 au, and several long-lived bursts in brightness in 2018/2019 could have been spurred by this orbital shift. Excitingly, a fainter comoving object, 240P-B, was first reported in June 2025 as the comet headed toward perihelion — at some point recently, 240P had split in two!

Over the last century, numerous split comets have been recorded, but detailed physical studies of these objects are rare. With growing evidence suggesting splitting and disintegration are the primary mechanisms of comet destruction, understanding the properties and cause of 240P’s split is imperative.

Observing 240P

With 240P on the move to perihelion, David Jewitt (University of California, Los Angeles) and collaborators monitored the comet from October 2025 to April 2026 to establish the likely cause of its split. Employing the Alhambra Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera on the 2.56-meter Nordic Optical Telescope, the authors obtained detailed imaging of the comet from two months before to four months after perihelion to characterize both components.

Tracking both photometric and morphological changes across their observations, the authors estimated the dust-loss rates, physical sizes, and separation speed of 240P-A and 240P-B. The brighter component, 240P-A, has an estimated radius between 400 and 600 meters and a dust-loss rate almost four times higher than 240P-B. Because 240P-B is fainter, its radius is harder to constrain observationally. From its lower dust-loss rate and lower brightness, the authors estimated a radius around 300 meters (and no smaller than 50). Based on how the separation of the two comet pieces changes over time, the authors determined that the split of 240P occurred at least three years before their observations.

dust mass-loss

Dust mass-loss rates for 240P-A (green circles) and 240P-B (yellow diamonds) over the course of the observations. Both components peak shortly before perihelion (dashed vertical line). Click to enlarge. [Jewitt et al 2026]

Source of the Split

How exactly did this fragmented comet get this way? The authors considered a number of comet-splitting mechanisms: tidal forces, asteroid impact, pressure buildup below the comet’s surface, thermal stresses, and rotational instability. Given the comet’s orbit, it has not had close enough encounters with the Sun or other planets for tidal forces to be the culprit, and it traverses well above the asteroid belt, avoiding collisions. Pressure buildup and thermal stresses can fracture comets, but both are unlikely to launch such a large fragment as seen in this system.

This leaves rotational instability as the likely source of 240P’s split. Outgassing torques lead to rotational instability, especially in subkilometer comets like 240P, and 240P has exhibited recent outgassing. In addition, the separation speed between the 240P components is comparable to the escape speed of the primary comet, which is expected for rotational breakup. To confirm this hypothesis, future observations measuring the rotation period of 240P are necessary, but this study adds to the small number of split-comet observations that aid in understanding comet destruction.

Citation

“Investigation of Split Comet 240P/NEAT,” David Jewitt et al AJ 172 113. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae83ac

Illustration of gravitational waves emanating from a pair of black holes approaching a merger

A recent Focus Issue of the Astrophysical Journal Letters describes the fourth version of the catalog of gravitational wave events (GWTC-4.0) from the Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO), the Virgo interferometer, and the Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector (KAGRA).

This catalog contains transient gravitational wave events recorded through January 2024, during the observatories’ fourth observing run, which concluded in November 2025. GWTC-4.0 displays the results of significant improvements to our suite of gravitational wave detectors, including higher-powered lasers and reduced quantum noise. A fifth catalog of gravitational wave events was released in Spring 2026, with the accompanying scientific articles being submitted to the Astrophysical Journal and the Astrophysical Journal Letters.

This Monthly Roundup consists of short descriptions of each of the currently published research articles in the LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA Gravitational Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC): Release 4 Focus Issue. Each snippet links to the corresponding research article, and the Focus Issue landing page is linked at the bottom of this post. Be sure to revisit the landing page to catch new articles as they’re published!

Introducing GWTC-4.0

timeline of gravitational wave observatories' observing runs

A timeline showing observing runs between 2015 and 2024. Click to enlarge. [LVK Collaboration 2025]

First up, the collaboration orients the reader to many important aspects of the catalog and the articles contained in the Focus Issue. This article describes how four detectors, each with two arms 3–4 kilometers long, monitor gravitational waves from Hanford, Washington; Livingston, Louisiana; Santo Stefano a Macerata, Italy; and Hida, Japan. These detectors work in concert, ready to receive signals from the universe during coordinated observing runs separated by periods of downtime for construction and commissioning. During these pauses, a smaller instrument, the German–British GEO600 gravitational wave detector, has kept an ear out for signals and will continue to do so until the end of 2026.

After these detectors record subtle spacetime squiggles from compact objects colliding millions to billions of light-years away, the collaboration converts the raw signals into the data contained in catalogs like GWTC-4.0. This process involves modeling the gravitational wave signals, filtering them to identify candidate transients, and pinpointing the most significant events.

After collecting and cleaning the signals, the collaboration undertakes a critical step: making their data accessible to researchers and the public. The data are available through the Gravitational Wave Open Science Center, and the Focus Issue article on open data describes how to navigate the online portal, how the datasets archived online are structured, and how the data were calibrated.

Science Results

This fourth version of the gravitational wave transient catalog greatly expands the sample of gravitational wave transients recorded by detectors across the globe. Including events from previous catalogs, GWTC-4.0 brings us to 218 events for which the probability of the source being astrophysical in nature is more than 50% and for which there is little chance of the signal being an instrumental artifact. This represents a more than 100% increase in the number of recorded gravitational wave events fulfilling this criterion, broadening our understanding of colliding compact object pairs. This release also includes some superlative signals, such as the most massive black hole binary with a low false-alarm rate and the highest signal-to-noise ratio for a gravitational wave event thus far.

Detected in November 2023 by both LIGO Hanford and LIGO Livingston, GW231123 is in many ways an exceptional gravitational wave transient. The total mass of the merging components appears to be between 190 and 265 solar masses, and the false-alarm rate for this signal is less than one per year. This makes it the most massive merger event with such a low false-alarm probability. The two components also appear to have high spins, which complicates the interpretation of the signal with existing models. A binary black hole merger in which one or more components lies within the pair-instability mass gap is the likeliest explanation for this signal, but the authors also present alternative scenarios, such as a core-collapse supernova or a gravitationally lensed gravitational wave signal.

GW230814 gravitational wave signal

Representations of the GW230814 gravitational wave signal. Click to enlarge. [LVK Collaboration 2026]

GW230814, which was detected only by LIGO Livingston, is the loudest signal in the catalog. This signal is consistent with the collision of two black holes, each of roughly 30 solar masses. During the analysis of this signal, the team discovered potential deviations from the predictions of general relativity in the ringdown phase, when the remnant black hole settles into its final shape. Without a detection from another facility to corroborate this finding, it’s difficult to pinpoint the cause of the deviation, but the team could not rule out statistical noise fluctuations as the source.

Plot of the differential merger rate

Plot of the differential merger rate as a function of the mass of the more massive of the two merger components. This shows overdensities at 10, 35, and possibly 20 solar masses. Click to enlarge. [LVK Collaboration 2026]

Surveying merging black holes and neutron stars on the population level, the team analyzed 158 gravitational wave signals from the current catalog. This analysis supported findings from previous transient catalogs, including multiple overdensities in the distribution of merging black hole masses, broadly distributed neutron star masses, and an increase in the merger rate with redshift. The new data strengthened certain previously identified trends, such as an increase in the width of the effective spin distribution with redshift, and weakened others.

The full list of articles in the GWTC-4.0 Focus Issue can be found here.

Citation

“GWTC-4.0: An Introduction to Version 4.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog,” A. G. Abac et al 2025 ApJL 995 L18. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c06

“GWTC-4.0: Methods for Identifying and Characterizing Gravitational-Wave Transients,” A. G. Abac et al 2026 ApJL 1004 L21. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae447b

“Open Data from LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA Through the First Part of the Fourth Observing Run,” A. G. Abac et al 2026 ApJ 1004 232. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae211e

“GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA Observing Run,” A. G. Abac et al 2026 ApJL 1004 L22. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae2c74

“GW231123: A Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190–265 M⊙,” A. G. Abac et al 2025 ApJL993 L25. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c9c

“GW230814: Investigation of a Loud Gravitational-Wave Signal Observed with a Single Detector,” A. G. Abac et al 2026 ApJL 1004 L23. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae2ad3

“GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries,” A. G. Abac et al 2026 ApJL 1005 L51. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae771e

Star formation in the early universe.

An unusual clump of gas 450 million years after the Big Bang may contain stars hailing from the universe’s elusive first generation of stars. New research examines an alternative explanation involving an accreting black hole.

Meet Hebe

Hebe and GN-z11

Hebe is visible in the image on the left as a prominent blob of helium emission up and to the left from GN-z11, a luminous galaxy hosting an accreting supermassive black hole. On the right is an infrared image of the same region, in which Hebe is not visible. Click to enlarge. [Adapted from NASA, ESA, CSA, Ralf Crawford (STScI)]

Initially spotted in 2024, an early-universe gas clump nicknamed Hebe has now been identified as a possible hiding place of Population III (Pop III) stars — the universe’s first generation of stars. Pop III stars are thought to be massive and chemically pristine, containing only hydrogen, helium, and a whisper of lithium. This exciting hypothesis was prompted by the detection of recombination lines from helium, which could be ionized by the high-energy radiation of the first stars.

Before the community settles on this exciting explanation, however, the hypothesis must withstand all the tests astronomers can throw at it. In a recent research article, Junehyoung Jeon, Tae Bong Jeong, and Saiyang Zhang (The University of Texas at Austin) along with Volker Bromm (The University of Texas at Austin) attempted to explain Hebe’s properties in another way.

Considering Alternatives

Hebe glows with distinctive helium emission that requires a source of high-energy radiation. This radiation could be provided by a cluster of Pop III stars, but it could also, in theory, arise from an accreting supermassive black hole embedded within the gas clump.

predicted Pop III star mass in Hebe

Predicted total mass of Hebe’s Pop III stars as a function of the Lyman–Werner flux from the nearby galaxy GN-z11. Click to enlarge. [Jeon et al. 2026]

The authors used models to explore both possibilities. For the first scenario, in which the telltale helium emission is driven by a cluster of Pop III stars, the team calculated the maximum possible mass of the cluster, which sets how much high-energy radiation is produced. The cluster mass is moderated by high-energy radiation from another source: GN-z11, a starburst galaxy situated about 10,000 light-years from Hebe. For the second scenario, the team modeled the spectral energy distribution arising from a supermassive black hole — either a direct-collapse black hole or a primordial black hole — accreting pristine gas from the surrounding cloud.

Still a Leading Explanation

While the black hole scenario could, with reasonable black hole masses, gas densities, and accretion rates, reproduce individual flux measurements drawn from JWST observations, this hypothesis struggled to simultaneously match multiple measurements. The Pop III star cluster scenario, with a cluster mass of a few hundred thousand solar masses, provided the best fit to the JWST data.

modeled spectral energy distributions for Hebe based on the black hole or Pop III star hypotheses

Modeled spectral energy distributions (lines) and predicted line flux densities (open symbols) for the accreting black hole, Pop III star, and Pop II (second-generation) star hypotheses. The observed JWST line fluxes are shown as filled circles. Click to enlarge. [Jeon et al. 2026]

As a final test, the team introduced a third possibility involving a population of second-generation stars, which are more chemically enriched than Pop III stars. While this model fit well, the number of stars necessary to match the data — roughly 10 million — would produce a stellar continuum detectable (but so far not seen) by JWST.

While a cluster of Pop III stars is still the leading explanation for Hebe’s properties, the team noted that the Pop III star and black hole hypotheses aren’t mutually exclusive; Hebe could very well harbor a primordial black hole and a smattering of Pop III stars. Regardless of what powers its characteristic helium emission, Hebe offers an enticing glimpse into the early universe, and more work is needed to understand this intriguing object.

Citation

“What Is Powering the Enigmatic He II Emitter Hebe: The First Stars or Black Holes?” Junehyoung Jeon et al 2026 ApJ 1006 27. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae7bea

A rendering of an orange and grey planet against a dark background.

What can some neon trapped in a chunk of rock tell us about Earth’s formation and the protosolar nebula? Quite a lot, as detailed in a recent study in The Planetary Science Journal.

Noble Mysteries

By analyzing rocks pulled from mid-ocean ridges, geologists have concluded that there are tiny amounts of noble gases in the deep interior of Earth. That’s a strange statement upon reflection: how did these gases, which are famously apathetic to essentially all other elements, end up embedded within rocks thousands of kilometers underground? Since their passivity rules out the potential of a chemical reaction that formed them in place, they must have been in the mantle since the very beginning of Earth’s history.

A map of Earth with the continents shown normally but the sea colored according to age.

A map illustrating the age of the seafloor. Mid-ocean ridges stand out clearly in red. By sampling material from these ridges, planetary scientists can infer the composition of Earth’s deep interior. Click to enlarge. [Mr. Elliot Lim, CIRES and NOAA/NCEI]

There are a few scenarios for how this could have happened. Though it’s possible that these inert species were delivered to the early Earth encapsulated within primitive meteorites or in solids contaminated by ions from the solar wind, at least some fraction of these elements likely came directly from the gaseous nebula that surrounded the earliest protoplanets.

That last option is especially exciting to present-day planetary scientists interested in constraining Earth’s formation history because it requires some very specific conditions. Since light noble gases like neon don’t dissolve well in seawater, they must have dissolved into a magma ocean — meaning the nebula was still around when Earth was large enough to have a molten surface. That already restricts us to a very specific time in the solar system’s history, but it doesn’t say much about the specific size of the proto-Earth other than “big,” and it doesn’t say much about the state of the nebula other than “it existed.” Recently, Vincent Savignac and Eve Lee (University of California, San Diego; McGill University) successfully refined these constraints to pin down information about both the early Earth and the nebula that surrounded it.

Infant Earths

Savignac and Lee began by growing a grid of infant Earths on their computers via models of gas accretion and atmosphere–magma interactions. Each simulation started with a different proto-Earth mass and nebular density, and each one yielded a different amount of neon in Earth’s deep interior. Excitingly, only a small handful of the scenarios tested ended up with values similar to those observed.

A cartoon of small cores surrounded by gaseous envelopes eventually merging into the Earth.

A schematic of Earth’s formation via embryo formation (when the noble gases enter the mantle) followed by mergers. Click to enlarge. [Savignac & Lee 2026]

On the mass axis, the team found a narrow range of acceptable conditions. If a proto-Earth was less than about 20% of Earth’s present-day mass, it couldn’t accrete much gas. This let it cool rapidly, freezing the magma ocean and shutting down neon dissolution before too much could be trapped inside. On the other hand, if a proto-Earth was more than about 40% of Earth’s present-day mass, it would accrete too much gas, stay molten for too long, and be left with too much neon. On the density axis, the researchers found that when the nebula accreted on to the proto-Earth, it must have been fairly depleted compared to its initial density. This implies that the whole process happened at the end of the nebula’s life, just before it was completely blown away by the proto-Sun.

Savignac and Lee demonstrated that these constraints are robust against the later stages of Earth’s evolution. In its later years, Earth either suffered or benefited from a giant impact, depending on your feelings about the Moon, but the researchers showed that this event doesn’t pose a problem for their models. Overall, this study builds a delightful link between rocks from our deep oceans and the particulars of Earth’s formation, demonstrating the unique power of planetary science to tie together different scientific fields.

Citation

“Constructing the Earth’s Formation History Using Deep Mantle Noble Gas Reservoirs,” Vincent Savignac and Eve J. Lee 2026 Planet Sci. J. 7 135. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ae64f7

J0749+2255

Researchers have detected molecules containing rings and chains of carbon atoms in the vicinity of a rare pair of quasars. The trends in the distribution of these molecules are unexpected, suggesting that more work is needed to understand the conditions surrounding active supermassive black holes.

Infrared Eyes on Molecules in Space

skeletal formulae of aromatic and aliphatic molecules

Examples of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons. Benzene (top left) is the simplest aromatic molecule. Propane (top right) is a simple aliphatic molecule. Propylbenzene (bottom) is an aromatic molecule with an aliphatic chain branching off of it. In these “skeletal” formulae, there is a carbon atom at each vertex, and the remaining atoms (not depicted) are all hydrogens. Single lines indicate single chemical bonds, and double lines indicate double bonds. [Wikipedia; Public Domain]

Across the universe, atoms are combining to form molecules, and our ability to study molecules in distant realms has never been better. JWST is particularly attuned to emissions from molecules engaged in a kind of chemical yoga, stretching their bonds and flexing the angles between their atoms.

JWST’s sensitive infrared eyes have allowed researchers to study the distribution, creation, and destruction of both aromatic (containing one or more rings of carbon atoms in which certain electrons spread out within the ring) and aliphatic (containing chains of carbon atoms) hydrocarbons. These molecules have been spotted in a wide array of environments, and now, astronomers are finding them in more distant and more extreme environments than ever before.

Distant Discovery

SDSS J074922.96+225511.7, or J0749+2255 for short, is a quasar pair seen 3 billion years after the Big Bang. The two feasting supermassive black holes are roughly 12,000 light-years apart, giving researchers a glimpse into the late stages of a galaxy merger and a harsh environment in which to study the survival and destruction of molecules.

Researchers studying J0749+2255 with JWST have previously reported the detection of a 3.3-μm emission feature from aromatic molecules. Now, C. E. Mentzer (University of Missouri), Aigen Li (University of Missouri), and Xuejuan Yang (Xiangtan University) have analyzed JWST spectra of J0749+2255 and found not just widespread aromatic emission at a rest-frame wavelength of 3.3 μm, but also aliphatic emission at 3.4 μm, which they attribute to carbon chains branching off from the aromatic molecules. This likely makes J0749+2255 the most distant galaxy in which both aromatic and aliphatic emission has been detected.

analysis results showing the aliphatic fraction across the quasars and the surrounding region

Aliphatic fractions in the bright central region surrounding the two quasars (top) and in the outer regions (bottom). [Mentzer et al. 2026]

Unexpected Trends

Mentzer, Li, and Yang subdivided the observations into 47 regions and measured the strength of the 3.3- and 3.4-μm features in each region. This analysis found strong aromatic emission nearest the quasars and showed that the fraction of carbon atoms bound up in aliphatic chains is highest close to the quasars.

Both of these findings are unexpected: the harsh radiation environment near the two active black holes is thought to break apart chains of carbon atoms attached to aromatic rings (which should decrease the 3.4-μm emission) and possibly destroy small aromatic molecules (which should decrease the 3.3-μm emission) — yet both of these features are strongest near the quasar cores where the radiation should be most capable of molecular destruction.

The authors speculated that the analysis regions centered on the quasars are large enough that they contain gas that hasn’t been pummeled by the quasars’ intense radiation and outflows, leaving molecules intact and able to produce the observed emission. However, this doesn’t explain the trend of stronger 3.3- and 3.4-μm emission closer to the quasars — necessitating further research into the emitting behavior of aromatic and aliphatic molecules under the extreme conditions of a dual quasar’s neighborhood.

Citation

“Widespread Detection of Aromatic and Aliphatic Emission in the Dual Quasar J0749+2255 at Cosmic Noon,” C. E. Mentzer et al 2026 ApJL 1005 L38. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae7e86

1 2 3 … 121