Features RSS

Images of a solar flare at different wavelengths

Forecasting solar flares is one of the major challenges facing solar physicists today. New research finds that non-thermal emission can precede a solar flare by more than an hour, and this early emission may signal whether the flare will be accompanied by an explosion of plasma.

Flare Flavors

photograph of a coronal mass ejection

The Solar & Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) took this coronagraphic image of a coronal mass ejection on 20 April 1998. [SOHO (ESA & NASA)]

Solar flares come in two basic flavors: eruptive and confined. Eruptive flares are accompanied by the launch of tangled clouds of plasma and magnetic fields called coronal mass ejections. Confined flares, so called because the solar plasma remains confined to the Sun, feature only a brief blast of high-energy radiation.

Both solar flares and coronal mass ejections can disrupt everyday life on Earth, with flares knocking out radio communications and coronal mass ejections threatening spacecraft electronics and power grids. Given these real-life risks, as well as the potential for probing the physics behind the activity on the Sun and other stars, it’s critical to be able to identify signs of upcoming flares.

Looking at the Lead-Up

Luckily, there’s growing evidence that the Sun sends out subtle signals that a flare is soon to happen. One early sign of an impending flare is an increase in the non-thermal velocity of the plasma at the flare’s location. This phenomenon has been spotted in individual flares, but it hasn’t been studied and characterized for a large sample of flares — until now.

example of increasing non-thermal velocity before a solar flare

Demonstration of the increase in non-thermal velocity seen in an M-class flare compared to the onset and rise time of the soft X-ray flux (gray shaded area). [Adapted from To et al. 2025]

A recent research article led by Andy S. H. To (European Space Agency) takes the first systematic, large-scale approach to studying the non-thermal velocity changes that precede solar flares. The team amassed a sample of 1,449 solar flares that were seen by the Hinode spacecraft, the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES), and the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Hinode provided the spectral information needed to identify increases in the non-thermal velocity, GOES provided the flare start times, and SDO provided detailed information on the location and appearance of each flare.

Of the flares in the sample, 83% were moderately powerful C-class flares, 18% were stronger M-class flares, and 1% were the most powerful X-class flares. To’s team identified a clear trend across all types of flares: the non-thermal velocity increases 4–25 minutes before the flare’s X-ray emission begins to rise, peaks when the X-ray emission peaks, and decays as the flare decays. The team found some evidence that for smaller flares, the velocity increase begins in spectral lines that trace cooler plasma before spreading to lines probing hotter plasma, but more work is needed to confirm this trend.

More Details

Examples of flares with and without coronal mass ejections

Examples of flares with and without coronal mass ejections. [Adapted from To et al. 2025]

Certain flares give even earlier hints of upcoming activity. M-class flares and some C-class flares exhibit what To’s team calls “precursor emission,” which emerges roughly 30–60 minutes before the flare’s X-ray emission peaks. The team also identified differences in precursor emission between confined and eruptive flares: eruptive flares display precursor emission over a broad range of spectral lines starting 45–74 minutes before the flare peaks, while confined flares show precursor emission later (31–54 minutes before peak) and in only a few spectral lines.

These results suggest that changes in the non-thermal velocity of solar plasma can not only signal when and where a flare is likely to arise, but also whether the flare will be accompanied by a potentially destructive coronal mass ejection. Upcoming missions like the Multi-slit Solar Explorer and SOLAR-C will give an even better view of the early stages of solar flares, helping to illuminate the physics behind them and enhancing our ability to forecast them.

Citation

“Systematic Nonthermal Velocity Increase Preceding Soft X-Ray Flare Onset: A Large-Scale Hinode/EIS Study,” Andy S. H. To et al 2025 ApJ 993 102. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae07de

constellation Orion

Multiple research teams have turned to the famous red supergiant Betelgeuse in search of a possible companion star hiding in its glare. A carefully designed spectroscopic search has placed new constraints on the identity of Betelgeuse’s stellar buddy.

Betelgeuse and its companion star

An image of Betelgeuse and its probable companion star from the ‘Alopeke instrument on the Gemini North telescope. [International Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA; Image Processing: M. Zamani (NSF NOIRLab); CC BY 4.0]

Betelgeuse and Its Buddy

Betelgeuse, a nearby red supergiant, is a variable star with a 400-day primary pulsation period and a 2,100-day secondary variation period. Recent studies have speculated that this secondary period is due to the presence of an 0.5–2.0-solar-mass companion star (often nicknamed “Betelbuddy”), and researchers using a speckle imaging technique likely spotted this companion earlier this year.

As is often the case when there’s an intriguing astronomical possibility, multiple research teams have sought out Betelgeuse’s purported stellar companion in different ways. One avenue recently described in a published paper was spectroscopic, searching for signs of ultraviolet emission lines from a growing young star.

Spectroscopic Search

In just 10 million years, Betelgeuse has sped through its main-sequence lifetime and taken on a new starring role as a red supergiant. In contrast, a 0.5–2.0-solar-mass companion star would not have even reached the main sequence in the same span of time. How is it possible to spot a tiny young stellar object next to a much brighter supergiant?

Hubble's observing pattern of Betelgeuse

Hubble observing pattern, showing how the quadrants are arrayed around Betelgeuse. Click to enlarge. [Goldberg et al. 2025]

A team led by Jared Goldberg (Flatiron Institute) found a possible way forward in the far-ultraviolet, where young stellar objects and red supergiants both display prominent emission lines. Though Betelgeuse would greatly outshine its stellar buddy, the companion’s orbital motion should shift its emission lines relative to those of Betelgeuse, bringing them into view. To guide their search, the team consulted spectra of known young stellar objects, finding a dozen ultraviolet spectral lines that either rival the strength of those from Betelgeuse or aren’t present in Betelgeuse’s spectrum at all.

The search is on: Goldberg and collaborators observed Betelgeuse with the Hubble Space Telescope in November 2024, timed to when the companion star’s emission lines would be shifted relative to Betelgeuse. The observations split Betelgeuse’s disk into quadrants, only one or two of which should contain the companion, helping the team tease out the signal from the smaller star, if present. Ultimately, though, no statistically significant signals were found.

spectra of Betelgeuse

Emission around Betelgeuse’s 1504.82 Angstrom H2 line from each of the four observed quadrants as well as combinations of two quadrants. No significant signals were detected at the expected radial velocity of the companion star. [Goldberg et al. 2025]

When Finding Nothing Tells You Something

A lack of a significant detection doesn’t mean that the companion isn’t there, but it does place constraints on its identity. The data confidently rule out a companion star twice as massive as the Sun, marginally permit a star in the 1.1–1.5-solar-mass range, and favor a star lower than 1.1 solar masses.

Researchers assigned a likely mass of about 1.5 solar masses to the probable companion star imaged earlier this year. Though this is at the limit of what’s permitted by the ultraviolet observations, Goldberg and coauthors note that the companion star’s ultraviolet output could be suppressed due to tidal coupling with Betelgeuse or other processes. If the star’s ultraviolet emission is lower than expected, a 1.5-solar-mass companion remains consistent with Hubble’s non-detection of the star.

This is a fantastic example of how multiple lines of inquiry can converge on similar solutions. With the companion star expected to swing around to a favorable observing position again in 2027, this is certainly not the last chapter in the tale of Betelgeuse and Betelbuddy.

Citation

“Betelgeuse, Betelgeuse, Betelgeuse, Betel-buddy? Constraints on the Dynamical Companion to α Orionis from HST,” Jared A. Goldberg et al 2025 ApJ 994 101. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c0c

Star formation in the early universe.

Astronomers have long sought evidence of the universe’s first generation of stars, and as more distant galaxies come into view, it seems these stars may finally be within reach.

JWST deep field

JWST spies thousands of distant galaxies in the classic Hubble Deep Field — many galaxies being uncovered for the first time with the space telescope’s powerful instruments. [ESA/Webb, NASA & CSA, G. Östlin, P. G. Perez-Gonzalez, J. Melinder, the JADES Collaboration, the MIDIS collaboration, M. Zamani (ESA/Webb); CC BY 4.0]

Excess Metals Popping Up

Since its 2021 launch, JWST has given astronomers eyes to peer into the distant past, discovering many galaxies whose light reveals the universe’s early stages of star and galaxy formation. Within the population of newly discovered galaxies are a few with bizarre chemical properties that, upon first pass, seem to be too enriched to exist so early in the universe. These hard-to-reconcile abundances may be a sign of the universe’s first stars. 

Known as Population III (Pop III) stars, the first stars in the universe were born out of giant clouds of pristine gas (hydrogen, helium, and a little lithium) and were able to form at masses hundreds to thousands of times the mass of our Sun. Though they burned bright, they did not burn for very long, ending their lives in violent supernovae and chucking their newly enriched guts back into their surroundings. While these stars are long dead, the chemical imprints they left on their host galaxies can persist  — and understanding how Pop III stars create and distribute metals could clue us in to the odd chemical signatures recently found with JWST.

Too Much Nitrogen in GS 3073

Researchers have identified a few galaxies exhibiting high nitrogen-to-oxygen (N/O) ratios that cannot be explained by stars similar to those in the universe today. A couple of these galaxies could be explained through multiple stellar populations, rapidly rotating stars, massive explosions, or the early stages of globular cluster formation. However, GS 3073, a galaxy with a redshift of z = 5.55 (about one billion years after the Big Bang), has an N/O excess so high that is has, so far, defied explanation.

Aiming to make sense of this bizarre phenomenon, Devesh Nandal (University of Virginia; Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian) and collaborators used stellar evolution models to see if Pop III stars could be the culprit. Modeling stars with masses 1,000–10,000 times the mass of our Sun, the authors traced the elemental yields of these supermassive stars as they go through the various stages of nuclear burning. The analysis takes into account mixing within the stars, mass loss throughout their lifetimes, and how the eventual supernova ejecta mixes within the interstellar medium.

N/O, C/O, and Ne/O abundance ratios of five modeled supermassive Pop III stars taking into account the contribution from other stars in the galaxy and the Pop III star losing 10% of its mass over its lifetime. The green star indicates the observed ratios of GS 3073. Click to enlarge. [Nandal et al 2025]

From this modeling, the authors found that massive Pop III stars between 1,000 and 10,000 solar masses can produce the observed elemental abundances measured for GS 3073. Stars less massive do not produce high enough N/O ratios, and stars more massive have much lower oxygen-to-hydrogen ratios — strongly suggesting upper and lower mass limits to the possible supermassive stars that could have produced GS 3073’s chemical composition.

Finally Evidence of Pop III Stars?

This study of GS 3073 is the first of its kind to confirm the chemical imprints of Pop III stars on their host galaxy at this redshift. The unique nitrogen abundance can only be produced through the evolutionary phases of Pop III stars that burn quickly enough to produce and release an excess amount of nitrogen while other elements stay consistent. From their modeling, the authors suggest that galaxies with even higher nitrogen excess could exist, and further observations with JWST may just find them. 

The search for Pop III stars is booming — another recent study (Visbal et al 2025) examines the galaxy LAP1-B. While GS 3073 shows evidence of Pop III stars through chemical abundances, the study of LAP1-B finds that the galaxy matches theoretical predictions for the formation environments and mass distributions of Pop III stars. Both of these recent research works are laying the groundwork for the wealth of discovery possible with JWST, and the universe’s first stars are no longer out of reach.

Citation

“1000–10,000 M⊙ Primordial Stars Created the Nitrogen Excess in GS 3073 at z = 5.55,” Devesh Nandal et al 2025 ApJL 994 L11. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1a63

A rendering of three white stars, two of which are very close together.

What if there was one process capable of creating every type of detectable stellar-mass black hole system? Recent research suggests there might be, and that it involves a triple-star system.

Three Separate Contexts

Stellar-mass black holes, or black holes that are at most a few hundred times the mass of the Sun, pop up in a number of different environments in the Milky Way. Astronomers have known since the 1960s that these black holes are the engines behind accreting low-mass X-ray binaries; more recently, researchers at gravitational wave observatories such as LIGO have found pairs of black holes orbiting each other just prior to merging; and, in just the past few years, scientists using the Gaia spacecraft have found black holes on wide, prowling orbits around still-burning stars.

A photograph of a patch of the night sky with two nested purple ovals overlaid.

An illustration of the first black hole discovered with a star on a wide orbit. The black hole moves along the smaller inner ellipse, while its companion star orbits along the wider outer one. [ESA/Gaia/DPAC]

Although each of these scenarios involves a black hole, it’s unclear how exactly these black holes are related to one another, or if they’re related at all. For instance, do low-mass X-ray binaries form the same way as the binary black holes observed with LIGO? Are the wide star–black hole binaries discovered by Gaia destined to eventually merge as two black holes, or are they a separate population altogether?

Recent research led by Smadar Naoz (University of California, Los Angeles) offers a potential answer to this question of relatedness — that each of these situations forms through the same underlying process.

Triples Systems

An illustration of multiple stars evolving along different pathways indicated by arrows.

A schematic illustration of how triple-star systems can produce all three types of observable stellar-mass black hole systems. Click to enlarge. [Naoz et al. 2025]

The mechanism Naoz and collaborators describe would work as follows. First, three stars begin their lives all bound together via gravity. Two of these stars orbit each other fairly closely, but the third hangs back much farther away. After the two inner stars burn out and collapse into black holes, they undergo the kind of collision commonly observed by LIGO and merge together. This process gives the resulting larger black hole a “kick,” meaning it goes flying off away from the site of the impact with some new velocity.

What happens next depends on the geometry of the system and the direction of the kick. If the remnant black hole gets shot away from the third star, it might just drift off on its own and leave the star behind. If the kick isn’t too strong, the remnant will remain gravitationally bound to that third star, and the system will eventually look like the star–black hole pairs observed by Gaia. Finally, if the kick sends the remnant toward the third star, some dramatic outcomes become possible: either the black hole starts nibbling on the star and the system becomes a low-mass X-ray binary, or the black hole simply smashes into the star, destroying it completely in a large, flashy explosion paired with a gravitational wave signal.

The authors stress that this mechanism is almost certainly not the only way that these three stellar-mass black hole systems form. However, it is exciting to consider a common thread underlying such seemingly different scenarios, and with upgrades coming to gravitational wave observatories, we can hope for tests of its feasibility in the near future.

Citation

“Triples as Links Between Binary Black Hole Mergers, Their Electromagnetic Counterparts, and Galactic Black Holes,” Smadar Naoz et al 2025 ApJL 992 L12. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0a20

A photograph of a dense knot of stars against a collection of more spread-out stars.

By simulating how the orbits of distant solar system objects were altered by close encounters with other stars early in the Sun’s life, astronomers have placed tight constraints on how long our home star stuck around its siblings after birth.

Born in Batches

Though our Sun currently travels on a solitary trajectory through the galaxy, its earliest childhood was not spent so lonely. Instead, the Sun was likely born as part of a litter of many other stars all collapsing out of the same cloud of precursor gas and dust. As a consequence, its early adolescence was spent in the company of dozens of other young stars, all zipping along on their own paths, destined to drift apart but initially packed close together.

A photograph of three bright stars within a circular cavity of gas.

The Hubble Space Telescope’s view of a collection of young stars still embedded within their natal nebula. [NASA, ESA, G. Duchene (Universite de Grenoble I); Image Processing: Gladys Kober (NASA/Catholic University of America)]

Despite their kinship, these young stars were not kind to one another when they passed nearby. When two stars grow close, the intense gravity of the encounter can severely disrupt their proto-planetary systems, scattering the objects orbiting farthest from their stars and potentially even ejecting some objects altogether. These early years likely left scars on the edges of our solar system that persist even today, billions of years after the early tussles.

Recent research led by Amir Siraj, Princeton University, leverages these scars or their apparent absence to ask the question: given the structure we observe in the outer solar system today, what limits can we place on the number of stars born near the Sun and the amount of time the Sun spent in its birth cluster?

Distance is Power

Several authors have asked this question over the past several decades, but Siraj and collaborators added a new twist: instead of studying either the giant planets or the cold classical Kuiper Belt, they instead focused exclusively on the “distant sednoids.” This rarefied collection of only nine known objects includes only the most distant minor planets in our solar system: the sednoids never come within 40 au of the Sun, and they spend much of their orbits beyond 400 au. Interestingly, however, all of them orbit on planes that are fairly aligned with that of the planets, and none ever strays farther than 20° from the ecliptic.

A black background with the sun at center surrounded by several large ovals, each labeled with the name of a minor planet.

An illustration of the orbits for some of the distant sednoids considered in this study. Click to enlarge. [NAOJ]

Through a suite of numerical simulations, Siraj and collaborators demonstrate that this relatively tight distribution of inclinations implies that the Sun couldn’t have been too roughed up on its way out of the cluster. By simulating many different close flybys and their influence on the distant sednoids, the researchers constrained the product of the number of stars in the Sun’s birth cluster and the time the Sun spent there to be less than or equal to 5 billion years per cubic parsec. Assuming a typical cluster density of 100 stars per cubic parsec, this suggests that the Sun cleared out of the densest and most dangerous part of the cluster within just 50 million years.

The authors stress that this conclusion leans on the assumption that the distant sednoids arrived on their extreme orbits essentially immediately, though in fact astronomers aren’t sure exactly how and when these objects ended up on the outskirts of the solar system. If the sednoids were in fact implanted onto their orbits early on, this limit on how long it took the Sun to leave its siblings is by far the strongest to date. With the Vera C. Rubin Observatory poised to discover thousands of new distant solar system objects, it’s likely that the bound will grow even more stringent in the next few years.

Citation

“Limits on Stellar Flybys in the Solar Birth Cluster,” Amir Siraj et al 2025 ApJL 993 L4. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1025

Supernova remnant N132D

Beautiful bubbles of hot ionized gas, supernova remnants trace the dying days of massive stars. A recent study uses the Chandra X-ray Observatory to detail the motion and understand the origins of one supernova remnant.

Retracing Supernova Remnants

Massive stars, about 8 solar masses or larger, will end their short lives in violent core-collapse supernovae. These explosions barrel into any surrounding interstellar medium, carving out low-density cavities and blowing material outward. Appearing as a bubble or shell of hot gas, a supernova remnant carries the signatures of the type of star that produced it and the ways that star shaped its environment throughout its life. 

Nearby, in the Large Magellanic Cloud, is the 2,500-year-old supernova remnant N132D — the most X-ray luminous supernova remnant within the Local Group. Though N132D’s size, likely progenitor mass, and chemical composition are well constrained, astronomers have yet to nail down the velocity of the X-ray shock front — the outer edge of the supernova remnant that rams into the interstellar medium. This measurement is critical to understanding the local conditions the supernova first encountered and how its expansion will continue to impact the interstellar medium over time.

Chandra Observations of N132D

Determining the shock front velocity requires astronomers to focus on the thin outer edge of the soaring supernova remnant — how do we measure the motion of such a narrow strip of gas? X-ray spectroscopy of N132D yields a measurement from a single epoch of observations, but it cannot isolate the narrow shock front, making a reliable velocity measurement difficult to attain.

supernova remnant velocity

The expansion of supernova remnant N132D around the rim for each of the regions analyzed in this study. The arrow lengths are proportional to their estimated expansion velocities. Click to enlarge. [Long et al 2025]

Circumventing the challenges of spectral analyses, Xi Long (University of Hong Kong) and collaborators used two sets of X-ray observations of N132D from the Chandra X-ray Observatory taken about 14.5 years apart to measure the motion of the shock front across the sky over time. This measurement, known as proper motion, compares the location of the foreground supernova remnant to stationary background stars to estimate its angular speed. 

The authors focus on small regions on the very edge of the supernova shock front, six northern and eight southern, to carefully measure the motion of the shock between the two sets of observations. In separating the shock front into smaller regions, the authors can determine any variations in speed along the shock front. The southern edge of N132D moves with the same expansion rate of 1,620 km/s. The northern edge has an average expansion rate of 3,820 km/s, but its speed is more varied, which isn’t unexpected given its blown-out appearance.

Modeling results showing the supernova age versus ejecta mass for the northern (red) and southern (blue) regions compared to the age estimate from an optical study of N132D. For the explosion energies and estimated ejecta masses between 2 and 6 solar masses, the models are consistent for all three. Click to enlarge. [Long et al 2025]

Comparing to Prior Studies

In addition to determining the velocity of the forward shock, the authors model the evolution of the supernova remnant to estimate the initial conditions of N132D including progenitor star mass, explosion energy, and ejecta mass. Their results agree with other studies that suggested N132D originated from a roughly 15-solar-mass star that exploded 2,500 years ago into a low-density cavity. 

This study showcases the unique ability of Chandra’s high-resolution instruments to carefully measure the evolution of supernova remnants, and further studies will continue to determine the detailed characteristics of supernova remnants across the Local Group.

Citation

“Chandra Large Project Observations of the Supernova Remnant N132D: Measuring the Expansion of the Forward Shock,” Xi Long et al 2025 ApJ 993 136. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae07c7

A rendering of a blue planet in the foreground and a small bright star in the background.

Astronomers often assume that sub-Neptune exoplanets have magma oceans hiding beneath their atmospheres. New research suggests that this might not always be the case.

Puzzling Type of Planet

In the 30 years since the discovery of the first exoplanet, astronomers have come to appreciate that many of the most common planets in our galaxy look nothing like the worlds in our solar system. One type of planet in particular appears to be ubiquitous despite not appearing in our own cosmic neighborhood: sub-Neptunes. As their name suggests these planets are slightly smaller than Neptune, but still much larger than Earth or what we’d expect from a planet composed mostly of rock.

Four planets side by side ordered by increasing size. From left to right, they are Earth, TOI-421 b, GJ 1214 b, and Neptune.

An illustration of how two sub-Neptunes mentioned in this study (TOI-421b and GJ 1214b) compare with planets in our solar system. Click to enlarge. [NASA, ESA, CSA, Dani Player (STScI)]

What sub-Neptunes are made of and how they formed are still mysteries under active investigation by the research community. It is possible that these worlds are mostly rocky and sport puffy, light atmospheres over their surfaces; it’s also possible that these worlds are watery, and that most of their mass comes from heavy, steamy atmospheres. In most cases, though, it’s assumed that the high pressures and temperatures at the surfaces of these worlds foster a permanent, fiery magma ocean.

This key assumption that there’s no solid surface to stand on influences our models about how these planets cool and evolve over time. However, new research led by Bodie Breza (University of Maryland) suggests that this premise might not always be appropriate.

Solid Ground

To test the assumption that every sub-Neptune has a magma ocean, Breza and collaborators simulated hundreds of thousands of feasible exoplanet interiors and atmospheres. Each simulation slightly tweaked various characteristics, like the surface temperature or the planet’s total mass, then checked whether the temperature and pressure conditions at the planet’s surface would leave any rocks in solid or liquid form.

phase diagram for a common rocky material

A phase diagram for a common rocky material MgSiO3. The various lines show different model pressure–temperature profiles for the sub-Neptune GJ 1214b, while the circles indicate the location of the atmosphere/surface boundary. All circles fall into the “solid” part of the phase diagram, indicating that GJ 1214b likely has a solid surface. [Breza et al. 2025]

Somewhat surprisingly, the team found that about a third of the models they simulated had solid, not magma, surfaces. They found there were two distinct ways to solidify the magma and create a firm shell. First and most intuitively, if the surface temperature falls low enough, the magma will simply freeze. Second and more intriguingly, they found that a planet can also suppress a magma ocean if its atmosphere is heavy enough to drive up the surface pressure beyond the solid–liquid threshold.

This latter result is particularly insightful in light of recent JWST observations that suggest many sub-Neptunes have heavy atmospheres. These new models suggest that these worlds might have solid surfaces, and that models attempting to explain their compositions should be tweaked to account for this finding. In these early days where astronomers are still puzzling out the most basic properties of these strange worlds, research like this demonstrates the power of using advanced theoretical modeling to help interpret our cutting-edge observations.

Citation

“Not All Sub-Neptune Exoplanets Have Magma Oceans,” Bodie Breza et al 2025 ApJL 993 L46. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c07

A rendering of two dark spheres surrounded by bright, misaligned disks drawing near to one another.

Black holes can have messy family histories, and a recent massive merger challenged astronomers to sort out just how many generations of black holes were involved in the event. Recent research, however, may have untangled the lineages of the two progenitors.

A Massive Collision

Earlier this year, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) detected the ripples in spacetime caused by the merger of two black holes somewhere in the distant universe. Though these detections have become increasingly common, this one in particular stood out among the more than 200 reported over the last decade. Named GW231123, this event must have caused more of a splash than a ripple since the two black holes that slammed together were unusually massive; both likely weighed more than 100 times the mass of the Sun. Not only that, each was also spinning unusually rapidly prior to the collision.

A photograph of two perpendicular straight lines that cut through a forest and meet at a complex of buildings in a clearing.

LIGO Livingston, one of the two LIGO detectors. [Caltech/MIT/LIGO Lab]

According to theory, black holes this large are not supposed to form on their own. When massive stars die, they can collapse into a black hole; but, when really massive stars die, the collapse is so violent that no material is left over to form the black hole. So, when researchers first measured the masses of the black holes involved in GW231123, they knew that the black holes involved couldn’t have formed directly from collapsed stars. Instead, they were likely second-generation black holes, meaning that they themselves formed from previous black hole–black hole mergers.

Merger Mystery

This result was celebrated as evidence of so-called “hierarchical formation,” in which black holes formed in dense environments swarm throughout their star clusters, merging with other black holes they encounter and growing ever larger.

However, there were a couple of complications with this picture. For one, theory predicts that it is challenging to form such rapidly spinning black holes from randomly oriented progenitors, since usually the spins wash out and leave the remnant rotating slowly. For another, the merging process tends to give the final black hole a “kick” that sends it flying rapidly away from the site of the impact, occasionally fast enough to leave the star cluster altogether, meaning second-generation black holes might not be able to merge into subsequent generations.

A multi-panel cartoon showing black holes merging through various combinations of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd generation black holes.

A schematic of various potential black hole family trees. The binary-star origin scenario is shown in the green box. Click to enlarge. [Stegmann et al. 2025]

Born as a Pair

New research led by Jakob Stegmann, Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, suggests a way around each of these problems. In the team’s model, the two black holes involved in the GW231123 merger didn’t form from isolated black holes in a cluster, but rather from binary stars embedded within that cluster. In this picture, two massive stars were born bound together, orbiting one another within a larger cluster of stars. Crucially for this scenario, the massive primordial stars have aligned spins — an expected outcome of massive binary star evolution.

After both stars in the binary collapsed into black holes, these black holes merged to form a rapidly spinning second-generation black hole. This second-generation black hole eventually encountered another black hole within the cluster and merged to produce the ripples in spacetime we observed as GW231123.

Since black holes born within binary systems are expected to have smaller kicks and faster spins, this scenario neatly explains the properties observed in GW231123. As LIGO keeps listening for more black hole mergers, hopefully similar events will provide more chances to untangle their complex family trees.

Citation

“Resolving Black Hole Family Issues Among the Massive Ancestors of Very High-Spin Gravitational-Wave Events like GW231123,” Jakob Stegmann et al 2025 ApJL 992 L226. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0e5f

gravitational wave illustration

Meet GW241011 and GW241101, two events from the fourth observing run of the LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA (LVK) gravitational wave detectors. With rapid spins and mismatched black hole masses, both events provide strong evidence for black hole growth through hierarchical mergers.

"masses in the stellar graveyard"

Masses of black holes and neutron stars discovered via gravitational waves (blue and orange circles). The red and yellow circles show the black holes and neutron stars detected through electromagnetic means. Click to enlarge. [LVK/A. Geller/Northwestern]

A Decade of Discovery

Humanity is 10 years into its study of the gravitational wave universe, and detectors across the globe are about to wrap up their fourth observing run. The recently released fourth catalog of gravitational wave transients, GWTC-4.0, more than doubles the number of recorded events.

Today, we’re taking a look at two of the fourth observing run’s gravitational wave events, both of which point to black holes born in dense environments.

Two Detections in the Spotlight

GW241011 and GW241101 are gravitational wave signals that reached Earth in late 2024. Using Bayesian parameter estimation, members of the LVK collaboration determined that each of these two signals arose from the merger of a pair of black holes.

plot of posterior spin distributions

Posterior distributions for the primary black hole’s spin magnitude for GW241011 (left) and GW241101 (right). [LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations 2025]

Though the LVK detectors have by now spotted dozens of coalescing black hole pairs, these two detections stand out. GW241011 is the third-loudest gravitational wave signal ever detected, and its primary (i.e., more massive) black hole has one of the largest and most precisely measured spins among black holes detected via gravitational waves.

GW241101 flips the script: its primary black hole also spins rapidly, but it appears to do so in a direction opposite from the direction in which the black holes orbit. Though its spin isn’t measured as precisely as that of the primary black hole in GW241011, this event still provides the best evidence so far that the spins of some merging black holes are misaligned with their orbital motion.

In addition to their standout spin parameters, these events are also remarkable for the masses involved. In both cases, the larger black hole has a mass of 15–20 solar masses, and the smaller black hole is significantly smaller — about 6 solar masses for GW241011 and 8 solar masses for GW241101.

A Black Hole Genealogy Project

Inferred masses and spins of the ancestors of the primary black holes of GW241011 and GW241101

Inferred masses and spins of the ancestors of the primary black holes of GW241011 and GW241101. Click to enlarge. [LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations 2025]

The rapid spins and comparatively large masses of the primary black holes of GW241011 and GW241101 don’t line up with what’s expected for black holes arising in isolated binary systems, unsubjected to outside influences. But they do match expectations for hierarchical mergers, in which one or more of the black holes involved is itself the product of a merger.

If these signals arose from hierarchical mergers, that tells us something about the environment in which the black holes lived. When two black holes merge, the product is expected to spin rapidly and receive a “kick.” For a black hole pair in a loose grouping of stars, this kick would likely boot the merger product out of the group, preventing it from encountering other black holes and merging again.

But in dense environments like compact star clusters, even a good strong kick isn’t enough to overcome the cluster’s escape velocity and launch the resulting black hole on a lonely journey through space. Instead, these black holes are retained in the dense cluster environments of their birth, where they may dance and merge with another black hole partner. While it’s not possible to entirely rule out other origins, such as an isolated pair of massive binary stars, the data strongly support the hierarchical merger scenario.

This discovery yet again demonstrates the ability of our gravitational wave detectors to reveal the lives and histories of black holes throughout our universe. Stay tuned for even more black hole news from the current observing run!

Citation

GW241011 and GW241110: Exploring Binary Formation and Fundamental Physics with Asymmetric, High-Spin Black Hole Coalescences,” A. G. Abac et al 2025 ApJL 993 L21. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0d54

A rendering of two rocky worlds mid-collision, with debris exploding outwards.

What would happen to a gaseous exoplanet if it was struck by a protoplanet? Recent research suggests that it would ring like a bell, and that just maybe, we’d be able to observe this ringing back on Earth.

Heavy Metal Mystery

Previous studies have hinted that giant planets have more heavy elements in their cores than we’d expect if they had formed from the exact same stew of gas and dust as their host stars. How exactly they end up with these enriched compositions is something of a mystery, though. Astronomers have proposed two potential theories: one somewhat dull, and one that involves dramatic collisions between the massive protoplanets.

In the first case, perhaps growing giant planets clear out the gas along their orbits, then steadily and quietly accrete the dust that spills over into the gaps. In the latter case, theorists have conjured a model in which growing gas giant planets repeatedly collide and merge with large and somewhat rocky protoplanets. Both of these mechanisms would produce the enhanced heavy element contents observed today, so how can we tell these two paths apart? Recent work by a team led by J.J. Zanazzi (University of California, Berkeley) proposes one such test.

Four spheres each showing a different oscillation mode, colored red and blue according to the change in temperature.

An illustration of the different oscillation modes within a gas giant after it’s struck by a protoplanet. [Zanazzi et al. 2025]

Ringing Planets

Through mathematical derivations, the researchers demonstrate that if a gas giant were to collide with a protoplanet, the impact would cause the planet’s surface to physically oscillate inwards and outwards, and for its surface temperature to vary. In other words, the planet would “ring” like a bell struck with a hammer, and as it physically convulses in the aftermath of the merger it would grow brighter and fainter in a repeating, periodic pattern. In principle, if the ringing lasts for long enough and the oscillations in brightness were large enough, observers back on Earth could record the amplitude and period of the changes and back out some constraints on what had happened and when.

An image of a bright disk, edge on, a coronograph mask blocking out the star, and a bright dot near the center of the mask.

An image of Beta Pictoris, including the young gas giant Beta Pictoris b and the surrounding debris disk. Click to enlarge. [ESO/A.-M. Lagrange et al.; CC BY 4.0]

Excitingly, the researchers demonstrate that not only would the oscillations last for millions of years, they would also be bright enough for JWST to detect for one specific planet named Beta Pictoris b. Should this world have undergone a merger in the last 18 million years, just a few hours of observations with JWST’s Near-Infrared Camera would reveal 45-minute pulsations in which the planet’s brightness changes by about 1%. Since the planet is too far away from its host star for these oscillations to be caused by any gravitational interactions, detecting any periodic signal would be a slam-dunk for the major merger theory.

Beta Pictoris b is a young planet in a system that’s still forming, and it orbits its host star on an eccentric path that takes it through dense regions of the disk. Hopefully, future observations will test whether this treacherous path produced any massive collisions in the relatively recent past. Until then, though, we can all enjoy charming visions of massive planets colliding with one another and ringing through the night.

Citation

“Seismic Oscillations Excited by Giant Impacts in Directly Imaged Giant Planets,” J. J. Zanazzi et al 2025 ApJ 993 3. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae04ec

1 … 4 5 6 7 8 … 118