AAS News RSS

Hubble Ultra Deep Field as seen by JWST

AAS Nova launched in 2015, and what has followed since is a remarkable encapsulation of 10 years of astronomy. Today, for our 2,000th post, we’re looking back on some of the discoveries we shared in the first year of AAS Nova and how far the astronomical community has come since then.

The Solar System, Exoplanets, and Astrobiology

HL Tau

The protoplanetary disk surrounding the young star HL Tauri has numerous visible rings and gaps in this image from the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array. [ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO); C. Brogan, B. Saxton (NRAO/AUI/NSF); CC BY 4.0]

The very first post published on AAS Nova discussed evidence for two planets hiding in the dusty protoplanetary disk around the star HD 100546. Protoplanetary disks are still hot topics — we’ve published almost 90 posts about them — and researchers continue to unveil new complexities like dust traps, crescents, shocks, spirals, jets, circumplanetary disks, gaps, and even more evidence for baby exoplanets blanketed with gas and dust.

Exoplanets are by far the most frequently featured topic on AAS Nova, with more than 300 posts mentioning these distant worlds. Almost exactly 10 years ago, NASA reported that the number of known exoplanets was over 1,800 — and now that number has surpassed 6,000. Researchers continue to discover planets that are smaller, colder, and found in more extreme locations than ever before (even right next door). On the habitability side of the equation, researchers continue to make headway on critical questions, such as whether the multitude of small, rocky exoplanets around M-dwarf stars are likely to have atmospheres.

Back in our solar system, the past decade has brought a bevy of firsts, such as the first measurement of the wind speed on another planet using an aircraft and the first definitive detection of water on an asteroid. Though controversial, researchers reported the first detection of phosphine in the atmosphere of Venus, a possibility that could have implications for life on our planetary neighbor but is complicated by many factors including the possible existence of active volcanoes on Venus. The search for life beyond Earth goes on, with researchers continuing to devise new ways to detect it, if it exists.

High-Energy Phenomena and Fundamental Physics

Gravitational wave astronomy started with a bang 10 years ago when the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) first detected colliding black holes (a discovery that we covered in our first year!). Since then, LIGO, the Virgo interferometer, and the Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector (KAGRA) have detected about 300 black hole mergers, and the explosion of gravitational wave data has enabled population-level studies of compact objects across the universe. This era also brought about the first detection of merging neutron stars, which was also studied across the electromagnetic spectrum; the first detection of a merger between a black hole and a neutron star; and the detection of mysterious objects in the “mass gap” between the lightest black holes and the heaviest neutron stars. New techniques for detecting gravitational waves have been demonstrated since they were first recorded in 2015; in 2023, international pulsar-timing collaborations around the globe announced that they’d found significant evidence for the gravitational wave background.

first image of the Milky Way’s supermassive black hole

The first Event Horizon Telescope image of the Milky Way’s supermassive black hole. [EHT Collaboration; CC BY 4.0]

In 2019, AAS Nova covered the release of the first image of a supermassive black hole. Since then, researchers have traced the magnetic fields around a supermassive black hole and taken a snapshot of the black hole at the center of the Milky Way. Considerable intrigue surrounds our galaxy’s central supermassive black hole, with recent research exploring whether it had a short-lived companion in the past and whether a collision with such a companion could explain the properties of the stars that orbit closest to our galaxy’s center.

In other high-energy astrophysics news, our ability to detect fleeting astronomical events has never been better, thanks to facilities like the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment, the Zwicky Transient Facility, and, most recently, the Vera C. Rubin Observatory. Astronomers have caught flares from stars totally, partially, and repeatedly torn apart by black holes, homed in on the host galaxies of fast radio bursts, explored the sources of gamma-ray bursts, and even discovered entirely new classes of transients. (And as a little preview of what you can expect in the next 10 years, here’s a refresher on just how much Rubin will reveal about the transient sky.)

The Sun and the Heliosphere

an animation of the Parker Solar Probe crossing a solar switchback

An animation showing the Parker Solar Probe traversing a solar switchback. [NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center/Conceptual Image Lab/Adriana Manrique Gutierrez]

The past decade has brought remarkable data about our home star from instruments on Earth and in space. The Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter joined the fleet of Sun-studying spacecraft in 2018 and 2020, respectively. Solar Orbiter watches the Sun from within the orbit of Mercury, while the Parker Solar Probe ventures even closer to our home star, getting within 4 million miles of the Sun’s surface and flying through its corona. From these incredible vantage points, the Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter are increasing our knowledge of the Sun and capturing never-before-seen solar phenomena like switchbacks and Sun dots.

Ten years ago, solar physicists were tackling the tricky problem of how to forecast damaging space weather events like solar flares and coronal mass ejections. Today, that work continues, increasingly aided by machine-learning techniques that make handling mountains of solar data more tractable. (The growth of machine learning in astronomy isn’t limited to solar physics; there were only 468 peer-reviewed astronomy research articles published in 2015 that mentioned machine learning, and more than 3,400 articles mentioning machine learning were published in 2024 alone.)

Researchers have also made headway on other persistent challenges like the open flux problem, the coronal heating problem, and how to handle sparse solar data sets.

Stars and Stellar Physics

An early AAS Nova post asked if we’ve finally found Population III stars, the first stars to light up the universe. Through observations and simulations, astronomers are still asking that question, probing whether Population III stars with masses lower than 0.8 solar mass could have formed, as these low-mass stars would still be present in the universe today; whether JWST could detect Population III stars during the epoch of reionization; and whether the first stars were solely massive stars that formed alone. While the first stars themselves may still elude detection, astronomers are gaining confidence that they’ve discovered stars born from the gas enriched by just a single member of the first stellar generation, getting us closer to understanding the first stars in the universe.

Betelgeuse and its companion star

An image of Betelgeuse and its probable companion star from the ‘Alopeke instrument on the Gemini North telescope. Click to enlarge. [International Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA; Image Processing: M. Zamani (NSF NOIRLab); CC BY 4.0]

Other stellar astronomy discoveries from the past decade involved stars that are less exotic than the first stars in the universe but no less exciting. Take Betelgeuse: we’ve shared studies of its Great Dimming episode, discussed the possibility that it’s the product of a merging binary system, and reported on the likely detection of its long-sought-after stellar companion.

This decade also brought the discovery of double-faced white dwarfs, a turnover of the initial mass function of a star cluster, and strange brown dwarfs like “The Accident.”

IC 348

JWST image of the star cluster IC 348. A discovery of the amino acid tryptophan was reported in the gas of this cluster, though further research called that discovery into question. [NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Kevin Luhman (PSU), Catarina Alves de Oliveira (ESA)]

Interstellar Matter and the Local Universe

There’s been plenty to learn in our cosmic backyard: researchers have discovered a potential “feather” in the Milky Way, tracked the rapid evolution of a gas cloud in the galactic center, found the faintest known satellite of our galaxy, and found evidence for structures within our galaxy that existed before it gained its disk or spiral arms. They’ve even solved the 50-year mystery of the Milky Way’s unexpectedly slow star formation.

In the space between the stars, we’ve seen many interstellar molecular firsts, like the first detection of an isomer of glycine, the simplest of the amino acids necessary for life on Earth, the first detection of ionized buckyballs, and the detection of complex organic molecules in the Large Magellanic Cloud. At the same time, other molecular breakthroughs were called into question. In addition to interstellar molecules, humanity has now also confirmed the first interstellar objects that have roamed into our solar system: 1I/ʻOumuamua in 2017, 2I/Borisov in 2019, and 3I/ATLAS in 2025.

Laboratory Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Software, and Data

Not all of astronomy happens at a telescope: lab work on Earth has shown how laboratory studies can help identify mystery spectral lines in the interstellar medium, explored how magnetic fields affect the formation of planets, and even examined the possibility of growing crops in asteroid soils.

A photograph of stars and long, horizontal, bright streaks caused by satellites.

Stars and satellites as seen by the Dark Energy Camera [CTIO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/DECam DELVE Survey, CC BY 4.0]

New instruments bring new understanding of the universe, and we’ve welcomed missions like the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer, which has made transformative measurements of polarization from sources like X-ray binaries. On the software side, we’ve seen updates to one of the most beloved astronomical software tools, Astropy, introduced its solar-physics counterpart, SunPy, and described algorithms that do everything from classify galaxies to sort Hubble proposals.

Astronomers are concerned not just with the outcomes of their research, but also how outside factors affect their ability to do research in the first place. As the number of Earth-orbiting satellites has exploded and the sources of light pollution have continued to grow, researchers have investigated the effects of light pollution on dark-sky sites and sought to understand the impact of satellite trails and space debris on astronomical observations.

Galaxies and Cosmology

In the broader universe, researchers continue to discover galaxies that are fainter and farther away than ever before. Both ultra-diffuse galaxies and ultra-faint dwarf galaxies have been in the spotlight. JWST, which finally began observations in 2022, has provided an incredible amount of data on galaxies both near and far. JWST revealed surprisingly massive galaxies in the first few hundred million years of the universe, creating challenges for models of galaxy formation and evolution. In 2015, the record holder for most distant known object was the galaxy EGSY8p7 at a redshift of z = 8.68. A decade later, that honor goes to the galaxy MoM-z14, at a redshift of z = 14.44 — an enormous leap that demonstrates how our view of the universe has expanded.

little red dots

JWST images of six very distant galaxies dubbed “little red dots.” [NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Dale Kocevski (Colby College)]

No roundup of galactic and cosmological discoveries from the past decade would be complete without a mention of little red dots: high-redshift sources spotted by JWST that are characterized by their reddish color, small sizes, and “V”-shaped spectral energy distributions. We’ve shared new developments about little red dots 10 times in the past year and a half (most recently discussing sources that seem to require no active galactic nucleus component to explain their properties), but we’ve covered only a small fraction of the scientific discourse that surrounds them: at the time of this writing, the phrase “little red dots” appears in 122 published AAS journal articles.

On the cosmology side of things, the Hubble tension — the apparent disagreement between the universe’s expansion rate measured in the local universe and the rate extrapolated forward from early universe measurements — continues to grow. Another less-well-known tension, in measurements of the S8 or “clumpiness” parameter, has also inspired scientists to propose tweaks to our leading cosmological model. On top of all this tension, measurements from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument have provided mounting evidence that dark energy, the largest chunk of the mass–energy budget of the universe, changes over time.

Here’s to 10 More Years

In addition to sharing a curated selection of astronomy news, AAS Nova has also brought you summaries of 30 AAS, Division, and topical meetings over the past decade. When the AAS and the Astrobites collaboration formalized their partnership in 2016, we expanded our coverage of astronomy news by sharing Astrobites articles on AAS Nova. In 2017, we launched the AAS Media Fellowship, a quarter-time position that enables an astronomy graduate student to build a portfolio of writing and gain experience working in the press office. Since then, we’ve featured nearly 180 articles written by our five Media Fellows, several of whom have gone on to careers in science writing and policy. We’ve also shared news and updates from the AAS journals, including the transition to open access, the release of new versions of AASTeX, interviews with publishing staff, and the celebration of the Astronomical Journal‘s 175th anniversary.

We hope you’ll join us as we continue our efforts to bring you short, approachable summaries of recent research in astrophysics and planetary science, amplifying the reach of researchers worldwide who continue to discover what’s new in the universe.

solar activity over the solar cycle

Editor’s Note: This week we’re at the 246th AAS meeting in Anchorage, AK, and online. Along with a team of authors from Astrobites, we will be writing updates on selected events at the meeting and posting each day. Follow along here or at astrobites.com for daily summaries, or follow @astrobites.bsky.social on Bluesky for more coverage. The usual posting schedule for AAS Nova will resume on June 16th.

Table of Contents:


Solar Physics Division Plenary: Karen Harvey Prize Lecture: Building Connections in Heliophysics with Surface Flux Transport Modeling, Lisa Upton (by Kerry Hensley)

The 2025 Karen Harvey Prize, “awarded in recognition of a significant contribution to the study of the Sun early in a person’s professional career,” went to Lisa Upton (Southwest Research Institute) for her work on large-scale solar flows and magnetic flux transport. Upton began by honoring Karen Harvey, with whom she shares many scientific interests. Harvey’s interest in solar physics began as a teenager observing sunspots with a small telescope, which led to her first scientific paper. She is remembered for her service to the solar physics community, her spirit of collaboration, and her education and public outreach efforts.

a large, dark sunspot surrounded by a pattern of solar granules

An extreme close-up of a sunspot taken by the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope in Hawai’i. [NSO/AURA/NSF; CC BY 4.0]

Upton began by studying coronal loops — arches of plasma confined by magnetic fields and suspended within the Sun’s outer atmosphere, or corona — before transitioning to her current work on the solar activity cycle. The Sun’s 11-year activity cycle, which manifests as periodic changes in the frequency of sunspots, solar flares, and coronal mass ejections, is intimately related to the Sun’s complex magnetic field. The Sun’s interior acts like a fluid, allowing the magnetic field to be frozen into the plasma, meaning that the motion and evolution of the magnetic field is largely dictated by the behavior of the plasma. As Upton noted, this is unlike anything we see on Earth.

How the Sun’s magnetic field explains the existence of the solar cycle is described by the Babcock dynamo model. In this model, the differential rotation of the Sun — the faster rotation of the Sun at its equator than at its poles — stretches the submerged magnetic field and makes it stronger. The field then becomes buoyant and causes sunspots to emerge at the Sun’s surface. The turbulent convective motion of the Sun that cycles material from the interior to the surface causes the surface magnetic flux to spread out, eventually being transported to the poles, where it cancels out the old magnetic field and creates a new field pointing in the opposite direction. This starts the solar cycle anew.

Upton described her research, which has covered a remarkably broad range of topics within solar physics. For example, she has studied large-scale flows, leading to the discovery of the long-sought-after giant cells. She also described her work on surface flux transport modeling, simulating the emergence and decay of magnetic flux through the solar surface. By incorporating observations of extreme-ultraviolet light from the far side of the Sun, Upton and collaborators greatly improved models of solar active regions emerging on the far side. More recently, Upton has been working to connect phenomena on the solar surface to the solar corona and beyond, working to predict the appearance of the solar corona during a solar eclipse, among other projects. She has also worked to generate realistic synthetic solar active regions, enabling both predictions of active region behavior as well as historical reproductions of the Sun’s appearance going back 200 years. Looking forward, she hopes to extend her research to the study of activity on other stars, where we see starspots far larger than anything on the Sun.

To close, Upton emphasized the need to remain united, support each other, and advocate for science as we navigate the challenging conditions in the world today.

Return to Table of Contents.


Public Policy Plenary: The Current Landscape for Science Policy and How YOU Can Make a Difference (by Lucas Brown)

To finish out a wonderful week at AAS 246, we heard from a panel of AAS leadership and participants in the recent AAS Congressional Visits Day on ways to make a difference in today’s current science policy landscape. First, we heard from AAS Deputy Chief Executive Officer and Director of External Affairs and Public Policy Joel Parriott, who provided an overview of what AAS’s stated science policy priorities are — focusing on the Society’s top priority of addressing the significant global issues that affect astronomy. A common theme that echoed throughout the plenary was that the advancement of these goals requires the advocacy and voices of as many people as possible.

Next, AAS Deputy Director of Public Policy Roohi Dalal spoke about the current state of science policy — from the large amount of proposed budget cuts we have seen come from the federal government over the past six months to the actions of the AAS in advocating for funding astronomy research. Specifically, AAS launched a “share your story” campaign to highlight the human impact of these cuts and has interfaced directly with representatives and their staff through initiatives like Congressional Visits Day. Dalal’s talk once again returned to the idea that the AAS needs everyone’s voice to make change.

AAS President Dara Norman then took the stage to explain in greater detail what actions people can take in supporting the policy goals of the Society and astronomy more broadly. Her top recommendation was to pay attention to AAS action alerts, which provide detailed instructions as to what actions will have the most impact at any given moment. Right now one of those top actions is to get in contact with local elected officials either via email, phone, or through an in-person meeting.

After Norman’s speech, the plenary transformed into a panel discussion featuring Lori Porter from Columbia University, Becka Phillipson from Villanova University, and Marcel Agüeros also from Columbia University, all of whom participated in this year’s Congressional Visits Day program. They spoke about the real impact that these sort of one-on-one visits with congressional staff or representatives can have, and shared tips on how to approach communicating effectively during such a visit. Their words of advice once again underscored the power of people’s voices in ensuring the future of astronomy remains bright.

Photo of the participants in AAS's 2025 Congressional Visits Day posing in front of the US Capitol Building

Photo of the participants in AAS’s 2025 Congressional Visits Day posing in front of the US Capitol Building. [AAS]

Return to Table of Contents.

Composite Webb NIRCam image of galaxy cluster Abell 2744, showing the locations of young starburst galaxies.

Editor’s Note: This week we’re at the 246th AAS meeting in Anchorage, AK, and online. Along with a team of authors from Astrobites, we will be writing updates on selected events at the meeting and posting each day. Follow along here or at astrobites.com for daily summaries, or follow @astrobites.bsky.social on Bluesky for more coverage. The usual posting schedule for AAS Nova will resume on June 16th.

Table of Contents:


Plenary Lecture: The Hubble Space Telescope at 35: Eyeing the Future, Jennifer Wiseman (Goddard Space Flight Center) (by Margaret Verrico)

Hubble image of the spots where the fragments of comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 impacted Jupiter

Hubble image of the spots where the fragments of comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 impacted Jupiter. [Hubble Space Telescope Comet Team and NASA]

Wednesday started bright and early with a plenary talk by Hubble Space Telescope Senior Project Scientist Jennifer Wiseman. AAS Vice President Grant Tremblay opened the talk with a story about seeing comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 impact the planet Jupiter on the news, an event that was imaged with Hubble and that he said influenced his decision to pursue astronomy. It was an appropriate anecdote to start the celebration of Hubble’s 35th year in orbit, which Dr. Wiseman credited with opening many new worlds in astronomy.

Dr. Wiseman began by describing how our science community has been transformed by Hubble’s impact. She highlighted Hubble’s multiple science instruments and ultraviolet–optical capabilities, which cover a crucial part of the electromagnetic spectrum that is not covered by other flagship observatories like JWST. She described the evolution of Hubble, from the first description of a space telescope by Dr. Lyman Spitzer in 1946 to its announcement by Nancy Grace Roman in 1977 and eventually its launch on the space shuttle in 1990. Its key science drivers originally included measurements of the expansion rate of the universe, understanding how galaxies have evolved throughout the history of the universe, determining whether supermassive black holes really exist at the centers of massive galaxies (only a theory at the time of launch), and studying planets in our solar system. Over the past 35 years, Hubble’s ~1.7 million observations of over 100 million objects have revolutionized our understanding of the solar system, star formation, and the evolution of the universe, leading to the discovery of the accelerating expansion of the universe, confirmation of the existence of supermassive black holes, and an understanding of a dynamic and evolving solar system.

Dr. Wiseman described how Hubble is a crucial part of the suite of Great Observatories in operation today. She emphasized its importance as a follow-up telescope for transient events like supernovae, its decades-long archive for long-term monitoring of solar system planet atmospheres, and its ultraviolet coverage that complements the infrared range of JWST. She promoted new support services for Hubble data, including the Hubble Spectroscopic Legacy Archive (HSLA) — a publicly available database of archival Hubble spectra — and the upcoming Hubble Advanced Spectral Products (HASP) database, which will be public later this summer. Dr. Wiseman cited Hubble’s continually improving user support and data archives as a crucial piece of the observatory’s future while warning that continued budget cuts have impacted their ability to fund new research and threaten the facility’s ability to support new science through the end of the 2020s.

Dr. Wiseman closed with a hope that the audience would leave her talk and the AAS meeting inspired to join the celebration of Hubble’s 35 years of discoveries. She expressed excitement for the new discoveries that will be enabled by Hubble through the early 2030s and its essential part in the suite of Great Observatories over the next half decade.

Read an interview with Jennifer Wiseman here.

Return to Table of Contents.


Press Conference: Recent and Upcoming Discoveries in the Broader Universe (by Lucas Brown) (Briefing video)

jellyfish galaxy NGC 4858

HST imagery of NGC 4858, a “jellyfish” galaxy that exhibits long tails of gas and stars extending outwards from the disk. These tails are expected to form as the result of drag forces as the galaxy moves through a gas-dense region of intergalactic space. [HST/ALMA/H. Souchereau]

In our final press conference of AAS 246, we heard five talks unveiling new insights into galaxies, reionization, and the universe at large. The first of these talks was given by Harrison Souchereau of Yale University, titled “Inner Tail Gas Asymmetries and Fallback in a Jellyfish Galaxy.” Jellyfish galaxies are a type of galaxy with star-forming tails of gas that trail behind the main disk. These tails are formed as a result of external pressures caused by the galaxy moving through a gas-dense medium like the space within a galaxy cluster. Souchereau’s team observed one such galaxy—NGC 4858—with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) radio telescope to map out not just the positions, but the velocity of gas in these tails. In doing so, they found that not only was the gas distribution asymmetric, but the gas appeared to be falling back in towards the galaxy. The team believes this shows that the gas was preferentially stripped from one side of the galaxy due to the direction of its rotation, and that the gas has since collected on the other side of the galaxy while beginning to fall back inwards. The full press release can be found here.

Next, in “In the Belly of the Beast: Massive Clump Formation in the Hearts of Major Mergers,” we heard from Sean Linden of University of Arizona about new insights from JWST into the dense star-forming clumps found in many major galaxy mergers. These clumps are unlike anything seen in typical, non-merging galaxies in the universe today, and they’re thought to be the “building blocks” of galaxies in the early universe. Thanks to the space telescope’s increased resolution and sensitivity to infrared light, it has been able to peer through the obscuring dust found within some of the universe’s biggest mergers to identify the presence and characteristics of such clumps. These new observations confirm many predictions about clump formation made in prior simulations. The full press release can be found here.

Third, we were briefed on “UNCOVERing the Drivers of Reionization with JWST” from Isak Wold of NASA and The Catholic University of America. Reionization was a period of a few hundred million years in the very early universe wherein the neutral hydrogen that permeated the cosmos at the time was nearly completely ionized. The exact origin of the necessary radiation to set off this reionization has long been a source of speculation. In Wold’s talk, new evidence was presented advancing the idea that a class of young, star-forming, and oxygen-III-emitting galaxies could completely source this ionizing ultraviolet light. Wold’s team draws on new JWST observations of such galaxies, which indicate that the galaxies are numerous, largely dust-free and metal-poor, and indeed emit abundant ultraviolet light—all the ingredients needed for a strong candidate to explain the epoch of reionization. The full press release can be found here.

Fourth, in “The ‘Dark-Matter Dominated’ Galaxy Segue 1 Modeled with a Black Hole and No Dark Halo” presented by Nathaniel Lujan of The University of Texas San Antonio, we heard about a new model for the structure of the dwarf galaxy known as Segue 1. Previous observations of the galaxy, which has few stars but a large amount of mass, suggested that the galaxy contains a large amount of dark matter. In order to derive the new model, Lujan and his collaborators compared observations of stellar motion against a set of 100,000 simulations of stellar motion given different underlying parameters describing the distribution of mass in the galaxy. The team found that a model including a central black hole with the mass of 500,000 suns and only minimal dark matter fits better than a dark matter–dominated model, challenging previous assumptions about the system, the prevalence of dark matter in dwarf galaxies, and the abundance of supermassive black holes in our universe. The full press release can be found here.

one of the first images from SPHEREx

One of the very first images taken by the SPHEREx mission. The color gradient present across the frame is the result of linear variable filters that cause different parts of each image to be sensitive to different wavelengths of light. By taking many images while panning over a patch of sky, this filtering allows each pixel in the image to be spectroscopically characterized. [SPHEREx]

And finally, in our very last press briefing of AAS 246, we heard from Caltech’s Phillip Korngut on “First Light with the SPHEREx Observatory.” This briefing provided an update on the status of NASA’s newest space observatory, the Spectro-Photometer for the History of the Universe, Epoch of Reionization and Ices Explorer (SPHEREx), which aims to take detailed infrared spectra of millions of galaxies and other astrophysical systems over the course of the next few years. The mission will accomplish this by scanning the entire sky with linear variable filters placed above the camera’s sensor, which essentially causes each row of each image to be sensitive to different wavelengths of light. By slowing panning over areas of the sky, this allows each pixel of an image to eventually be characterized spectroscopically. We were able to view the very first images taken by SPHEREx, as well as compilations of imagery that demonstrate the mission’s unique ability to observe objects like the nebula NGC 1760 across a wide variety of wavelengths. Data products from the mission are expected to go public in early July.

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: Advancing Exoplanet Characterization: Five Years of High-Resolution Spectroscopy with KPIC, Dimitri Mawet (California Institute of Technology) (by Margaret Verrico)

The next plenary lecture was given by Professor Dimitri Mawet, the David Morrisroe Professor of Astronomy at Caltech and a Senior Research Scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Professor Mawet talked about the importance of ground-based observatories and high-resolution spectroscopy for exoplanet science.

artist's impression of K2-18b

An artist’s impression of the planet K2-18b orbiting its host star. [ESA/Hubble, M. Kornmesser; CC BY 4.0]

Professor Mawet began with an overview of exoplanet science in the 21st century. The primary science goals in exoplanet research are understanding exoplanet demographics and diversity, learning how exoplanets form and evolve, and finding evidence of habitability and even life. More than 6,000 exoplanets have now been detected, but the vast majority have never been observed spectroscopically, which is crucial for characterizing their atmospheres, spins, orbital parameters, and weather. High-resolution spectroscopy in particular is crucial for measuring these properties, as it allows for the separation of exoplanet spectral features from the properties of the host star or Earth’s atmosphere. To that end, Professor Mawet helped develop the Keck Planet Imager and Characterizer (KPIC), a high-resolution spectrometer optimized for exoplanet science. KPIC has led to the detection of more than 30 exoplanets and brown dwarfs and several exciting discoveries.

Professor Mawet highlighted several works by his students on KPIC exoplanets. Mawet’s student Jason Wang directly imaged HR 8977, a four-planet system, and obtained spin measurements for all four planets, which can be used to study the relationship between the planets and their magnetic fields. Another one of his students, Chih-Chun (Dino) Hsu, will be giving a talk later today on the differences in the spin properties between giant planets and brown dwarfs. Using KPIC’s high-resolution spectrometer, Professor Mawet’s group has made groundbreaking discoveries in exoplanet formation science, paving the way for future work with ground-based and space-based observatories.

To wrap up the talk, Professor Mawet talked about the future of ground-based exoplanet science with the High resolution Infrared Spectrograph for Exoplanet Characterization (HISPEC) and Multi-Objective Diffraction-limited High-resolution Infrared Spectrograph (MODHIS). In particular, HISPEC is expected to nearly double the number of directly imaged planets and brown dwarfs when it comes online in 2027.

Read an interview with Dimitri Mawet here.

Return to Table of Contents.


Donald E. Osterbrock Book Prize Lecture: Where Are We? How Past Astronomers Found Their Place in the Universe — and on Earth, Seb Falk (University of Cambridge) (by Olivia Cooper)

Seb Falk during the plenary talk

Figure 1: Seb Falk giving his plenary talk, pictured with the astronomical chart that is the cover image for his book. [Seb Falk / Olivia Cooper]

In the afternoon, we heard from University of Cambridge historian Seb Falk, author of the book “The Light Ages: The Surprising Story of Medieval Science”. In his plenary (see Figure 1), Falk shared how our understanding of the Universe has evolved over the past several centuries, with a particular focus on the science of the middle ages. Before the existence of telescopes, astronomers were watching the skies and charting the motions of the stars and planets to incredible accuracy, even demonstrating that Earth is a sphere and calculating its size to within a few percent. In his book, Falk focuses on the journey of a 14th-century monk who navigated by the night sky, developed mathematical techniques to track the motions of the solar system, and kept time by the stars. Across the globe, in all regions and cultures, astronomy has been used in both tangible and esoteric ways, from ship navigation to interpretation of faith. Yet all of these pursuits are ultimately centered on understanding our position and direction as we move through the universe.

Throughout the talk, Falk shared a handful of lessons he has taken from the history of astronomy, about how to do astronomy in a changing world. First, everyone has a contribution to make: there are countless unknown, unnamed, historically-unrecognized people taking measurements, developing knowledge, and constructing instruments. Next, motivations matter, for better or worse. Our motivations for doing science (and for the way we conduct science) can provide momentum, and can also create biases and limit our scientific understanding. Further, astronomy is never pointless: though our work often seems abstract, the implications are quite grounded, and have led to the development of mathematical techniques, new technologies, art, storytelling, and more. Regarding the practice of astronomy, Falk reminds us that it is most impactful through physical experience, when we contextualize the act of doing astronomy by the experience of looking at the night sky. Upon these experiences, he notes that modeling matters; how we encode, distill, and distribute knowledge in turn impacts our collective interpretation of the cosmos.

Towards the end of the talk, Falk remarked that the pre-modern world was a time of amazing creativity, teamwork, patience, and interdisciplinarity. Although there were certainly misconceptions about the Universe and our place in it, he notes the importance of giving dead ends and disappointments a chance to pan out, and reminds us to persevere through times of political unrest and threat to scientific pursuit, as did astronomers of the past worldwide.

Read an interview with Seb Falk here.

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: Things in Disks: Towards a New Understanding of Galactic Nuclei, K.E. Saavik Ford (CUNY Borough of Manhattan Community College/American Museum of Natural History) (by Margaret Verrico)

The final plenary of the day was given by K.E. Saavik Ford, a Professor in the Science Department at CUNY Borough of Manhattan Community College, Professor of Physics at the CUNY Graduate Center, research associate at the American Museum of Natural History, and a visiting scientist at the Flatiron Institute’s Center for Computational Astrophysics. She discussed her work understanding “things in disks,” particularly stellar- and intermediate-mass black holes in active galactic nucleus disks.

Professor Ford opened with an image of the orbits of stars around the Milky Way’s central supermassive black hole, Sagittarius A*. Most of these stars are Type B, meaning there was once a population of O-type stars that have since gone supernova and left behind black holes and neutron stars. She argued that this should also be true around actively accreting supermassive black holes (active galactic nuclei, or AGN), meaning these stars and stellar remnants should be interacting with the AGN disk. These interactions will eventually have enough drag to bring those stars and their remnants into a coplanar orbit inside the AGN disk and can contribute to the formation of black hole binaries. In fact, Professor Ford argues that AGN may be a dominant formation pathway for black holes over 50 solar masses, which should not be able to form from supernovae of isolated stars. These objects have been observed as the progenitors of black hole mergers with LIGO, so their formation channels are an important piece of the gravitational wave puzzle.

Professor Ford spent most of her talk advertising McFACTS, a Monte Carlo simulation code for stellar-mass black holes embedded in AGN disks. She highlighted a few results from collaborators and students who have used the code, including her student Vera Delfavero’s modeling of the supermassive black hole mass peak at 108 solar masses (ADS link here) and predictions by Harrison Cook for the gravitational wave signatures of the AGN channel (ADS link here). She also discussed ongoing and future work to improve the software’s ability to model stars, electromagnetic signatures of black hole mergers in AGN disks, and transient events like tidal disruption events, changing-look AGN, and quasi-periodic eruptions that might result from those mergers.

Professor Ford closed out the talk with several pieces of advice. She advised working with kind people and being kind in return. She reminded the audience to control what they could control and to work sustainably. She emphasized the importance of doing research, building community, having hobbies, having a plan B, and wearing sunscreen. To close out today’s series of talks, she remarked that no one knows what the future holds, whether for good or for bad.

Read an interview with Saavik Ford here.

Return to Table of Contents.

coronal mass ejection seen by PUNCH

Editor’s Note: This week we’re at the 246th AAS meeting in Anchorage, AK, and online. Along with a team of authors from Astrobites, we will be writing updates on selected events at the meeting and posting each day. Follow along here or at astrobites.com for daily summaries, or follow @astrobites.bsky.social on Bluesky for more coverage. The usual posting schedule for AAS Nova will resume on June 16th.

Table of Contents:


Laboratory Astrophysics Division Plenary Lecture: Icy Ocean Worlds, Europa Clipper, and the Search for a Second Genesis, William McKinnon (Washington University in St. Louis) (by Karthik Yadavalli)

In this talk, Dr. William McKinnon gave a detailed overview of the Europa Clipper mission and the science that is expected from this mission. The mission will fly by Europa, a moon of Jupiter. Dr. McKinnon started by comparing the Europa Clipper mission to the Cassini mission. The Cassini mission flew by Saturn during 2004–2017, learning about both Saturn and its many moons.

Europa is somewhat like a “smaller Earth,” with a large ocean and a cooler (~100 Kelvin) surface. JWST has found solid carbon dioxide on its surface. The clipper is meant to be a comprehensive mission that studies the ice, composition of the moon, and geology of the moon. Europa is expected to have many of the ingredients for life:

  1. Water: Europa has much more water than all of Earth’s oceans
  2. Essential elements: Elements like hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen would have been present from formation and were likely also added to Europa from impacts and collisions
  3. Chemical energy: Though the surface is likely too cold for life, there would be sources of energy both from Jupiter’s emission and from deep-sea vents.
A schematic of the Europa Clipper showing all of the instruments on the clipper.

Figure 1: A schematic of Europa Clipper and all of its instruments. [Slide by William McKinnon]

Because Europa Clipper is meant to study many aspects of the physics of Europa, it has many instruments, as seen in Figure 1.

Dr. McKinnon then went on to describe the Clipper mission in detail. It launched in October 2024 and will enter Jupiter orbit in early 2031. During that period, it will orbit around Jupiter for several years. The Clipper already has flown past Mars and taken a thermal image of the surface of Mars (see Figure 2).

This shows thermal images of the surface of mars. The one on the left is a black and white image showing the data taken from the instrument on Europa Clipper. On the right is a detailed and color image taken by a different, more sensitive image.

Figure 2: Thermal image of Mars taken by Europa Clipper (left) compared to a detailed thermal image of Mars by TES (right), a dedicated instrument for that task. The two images agree with each other very well, showing that the Europa Thermal Emission Imaging System works extremely well. [Slide by William McKinnon]

Dr. McKinnon also emphasized that at least two other missions will overlap with the Clipper while in Jupiter’s orbit. Both Juice, a European Space Agency mission, and Tianwen-4, a Chinese mission, will overlap in Jupiter orbit, potentially allowing for synergies in science.

Dr. McKinnon finished by emphasizing that planned future exploration of the Jupiter systems is going to be very exciting. Three of Jupiter’s moons, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto, will in particular be well-studied by the three planned missions.

Return to Table of Contents.


Press Conference: Press Conference: Planets, Exoplanets, and Brown Dwarfs (by Lexi Gault) (Briefing video)

Revealing the Classical Uranian Satellites in Ultraviolet — Christian Soto (Space Telescope Science Institute)

With the Hubble Space Telescope, Christian Soto and collaborators obtained ultraviolet spectroscopy of four moons of Uranus — Ariel, Titania, Umbriel, and Oberon — to investigate how Uranus’s magnetosphere affects the surfaces of the moons. This system is particularly interesting to study because Uranus’s axis of rotation is tilted 98 degrees from the plane in which its moons orbit. This extreme tilt causes the magnetic field lines to sweep past the moons frequently, causing charged particles moving along the field lines to interact with the moons. Soto and team hypothesized that since these four moons are tidally locked, meaning that one side of the moon always faces Uranus (“leading” side) and the other always faces away (“trailing” side), interactions with the charged particles trapped in the magnetosphere would primarily hit the trailing sides, causing them to darken. However, their observations revealed that the leading sides of the two outer moons, Titania and Oberon, show evidence of darkening — the opposite of their hypothesis. Instead, the group suggests that dust from irregular satellites orbiting Uranus is hitting the leading sides of these moons, causing them to darken, and interactions with the magnetosphere are actually less influential than previously thought. Upcoming JWST observations of the system will help us to further understand this interesting result. The full press release can be found here.

Off-Polar Hint: Hottest-Star Sub-Saturn Obliquity — Emma Dugan (Indiana University)

The planets in our solar system orbit the Sun in the same direction that it spins, however, in many exoplanet systems, this is not always the case. In particular, Jupiter-mass planets orbiting hot stars tend to be misaligned, while Jupiters around cooler stars tend to be more well aligned. However, recent observations show that smaller sub-Saturn-type planets can be misaligned around cool stars, often with polar orbits — but few observations exist for sub-Saturns around hot stars, limiting our understanding of sub-Saturn formation. Aiming to add to the picture, Emma Dugan and collaborators investigated the spin–orbit alignment of the sub-Saturn TOI-1135 b, which orbits the hottest star with such measurements to date. Using observations obtained with NEID on the WIYN 3.5-meter telescope, the team found that TOI-1135 b has a near-polar orbit, unlike the polar orbits of sub-Saturns around cooler stars. This observation suggests that sub-Saturns orbiting cooler stars may be more misaligned than sub-Saturns orbiting hot stars, the opposite of what is observed for Jupiter-mass planets. Further observations of sub-Saturns will aid in filling out this dataset and understanding the formation mechanism governing sub-Saturns.

14 Herculis c

The new image of the exoplanet 14 Herculis c from JWST. The white star marks the location of the host star, which is blocked from view by a coronagraph. [NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, W. Balmer (JHU), D. Bardalez Gagliuffi (Amherst College)]

JWST Coronagraphic Images of 14 Her c: a Cold Giant Planet in a Dynamically Hot, Multi-Planet System — William Balmer (Johns Hopkins University) & Mark Giovinazzi (Amherst College)

When studying exoplanets, astronomers want to understand how planetary systems form and evolve over time. One of the best ways to understand and characterize exoplanets is through directly imaging them, but this is a difficult task when these planets, especially cold ones, are so faint next to their host stars, hidden within the overpowering bright stellar light. However, with JWST’s great sensitivity to longer wavelengths where cold planets appear brighter, direct imaging becomes a possibility. William Balmer and Mark Giovinazzi presented the first JWST direct image of the cold giant planet 14 Her c, which was one of two planets previously detected through radial velocity measurements of the system. Their observations reveal that 14 Her c was fainter than anticipated based on modeling, which is likely due to updrafts and water-ice clouds in its atmosphere. Additionally, the team refit the orbits of the two planets and determined that 14 Her c was likely scattered out to its current, far-out orbit due to dynamics and interactions with the other planet in the system. See the full press release here.

Detailed JWST Observations of a Multi-Planet System Around a Sun-Like Star — Kielan Hoch (Space Telescope Science Institute)

YSES-1 is an exoplanetary system with multiple planets orbiting a young Sun-like star, only ~16 million years old, that was originally directly imaged in the Young Suns Exoplanet Survey. This system is interesting because it has two planets that are both orbiting very far from the central star — YSES-1 b at 160 times the distance of Earth to the Sun and YSES-1 c at 320 times the distance of Earth to the Sun. With the launch of JWST, Kielan Hoch and her collaborators wanted to directly image these planets again with the high-resolution spectroscopy and imaging of JWST. From their observations, the team was able to detect different molecules in the atmospheres of the two planets. For YSES-1 c, the spectra show evidence of silicate clouds in its atmosphere, demonstrating the strongest absorption feature observed in an exoplanet to date. For YSES-1 b, the team observed a disk around the planet that is likely material that will feed onto the planet. However, such disk-like features are typically only present for planets younger than YSES-1 b, so the team suggests that this may be a second-generation disk of material that is involved in forming a moon. Further observations and modeling will reveal more information and clues into the formation history of these planets. See the full press release here.

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: The Missing Link: Planet Formation from Millions to Billions of Years, Meredith Hughes (Wesleyan University) (by Karthik Yadavalli)

In her talk, Dr. Meredith Hughes (Wesleyan University) presented results from the ALMA survey to resolve exoKuiper belt structure (ARKS). She started by emphasizing how rapidly the field of exoplanet observations has evolved in the past two decades, and that we now know that on average every star in the galaxy likely has at least one planet. As such, it is now possible to ask detailed questions about how planets are formed around stars. When a star forms from a large dust cloud, a protoplanetary disk also forms alongside it. Planets will eventually form in this disk. Protoplanetary disks only last about ~10 million years after the star forms, whereas the planets we detect are expected to have ages of ~billions of years. As such, the evolution stages in between the protoplanetary disk and the full-fledged planet have not been observationally mapped out.

Dr. Hughes focuses on trying to find systems that are in between these two stages. With ALMA, Dr. Hughes has been able to take very detailed images of the “debris disk,” the intermediate stage between the protoplanetary disk and fully formed planets. The solar system’s Kuiper Belt is the analog of a debris disk. ALMA is now sensitive enough to take detailed images of debris disks. In particular, the ARKS survey has obtained 18 new high-resolution observations of previously not observed debris disks.

presentation slide showing possible vertical profiles of a debris disk

Figure 1: Vertical structure in a debris disk can reveal the mass of the planet living in the disk. More massive planets will cause the disk to flare up, whereas lower-mass planets will keep the disk quite flat. [Slide by Meredith Hughes]

Dr. Hughes went into detail about three findings about the debris disks from the ARKS survey: 1) finding substructure, 2) studying the vertical extent of debris disks (see Figure 1), and 3) finding gas content in the debris disks. With the increased sensitivity of the ARKS survey, much more substructure of debris disks is visible. Sensitivity to substructure allows for detailed study specifically of planet-disk interactions. Studying the vertical extent of debris disks allows for better constraints on the mass of the observed planet.

Dr. Hughes concluded by briefly describing the institution at which she works, Wesleyan University. Wesleyan is primarily an undergraduate institution and therefore the research at the university is primarily done by younger students rather than by postdocs and PhD students. It also offers a path to an astronomy PhD for nontraditional students, including those who have not started their academic careers in astronomy (see Figure 2).

presentation slide presenting information about Wesleyan University

Figure 2: Wesleyan University offers a path into astronomy academia for nontraditional students and primarily focuses on undergraduate studies. [Slide by Meredith Hughes]

Return to Table of Contents.


Press Conference: New Views and Insights into the Sun and Its Surroundings (by Lucas Brown) (Briefing video)

coronal mass ejection seen by PUNCH

[An image from the Narrow Field Imager (NFI) camera on board a spacecraft that is part of the PUNCH mission. PUNCH enables extremely wide field-of-view observation of the Sun’s corona. [SwRI]

Our second press conference of Day 2 was all about the Sun — from the dynamics right at its surface to the solar corona and all the way out into deep interplanetary space. First up, we heard “Polarimeter to Unify the Corona and Heliosphere (PUNCH): Mission Overview and First Light” from Craig DeForest of the Southwest Research Institute. This briefing provided updates on the PUNCH mission which launched in March of this year. DeForest described the mission as providing a look at “space weather like you’ve never seen before,” referring to the mission’s unique capability of observing the corona and solar wind across a whopping 90-degree field of view. The mission accomplishes this by pulling from data across four satellites evenly spaced throughout a polar orbit oriented to enable constant views of the Sun. While the mission is still in the commissioning phase and the satellites have not reached their final configuration, DeForest was able to show some amazing preliminary video footage compiled from the satellites for the very first time. The video demonstrated the mission’s ability to track solar coronal behavior from very close to the Sun all the way out to Earth — and to produce some incredible footage of space weather like no one has ever seen before! The full press release can be found here.

Second, in “The Coronal Diagnostic Experiment (CODEX): First Light,” Nicholeen Viall of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center presented on another new solar physics experiment that has recently been initiated. Whereas PUNCH focused on achieving a wide field of view of the Sun, Viall explained that CODEX is all about getting up close and personal with the dynamics of the corona closer to the solar surface. The experiment is mounted on the International Space Station and uses occulting disks to create an artificial eclipse, blocking out light from the disk of the Sun in order to view the corona. CODEX features numerous innovative technologies that allow it to measure temperatures and velocities of coronal material better than previous experiments, which will hopefully improve our understanding of the intricate dynamics and flow of energy that occurs within the solar corona. The full press release can be found here.

Third, we heard a briefing on “Cracking the Solar Code: Hybrid Machine Learning for Predicting Hemispheric Bursts and Cycle Trends,” given by Juie Shetye of New Mexico State University & Armagh Observatory and Planetarium and Mausumi Dikpati of High Altitude Observatory/NSF-NCAR. Their work focuses on trying to employ mathematical modeling, statistics, and machine-learning methods to better predict individual “bursts” of solar activity. Whereas solar cycles are periodic and fairly predictable, understanding when solar activity is going to suddenly rise on short timescales to produce things like coronal mass ejections is very difficult. Their team hopes that through synthesizing physics-informed models and advanced machine learning techniques, they can improve our ability to predict these events and therefore minimize the damage they cause here on Earth.

Three views of the solar corona observed during a total solar eclipse in April 2024 are shown, with the two on the outer edges being simulated from solar magnetic field data. The inner image is a real image of the solar corona from the moment of totality.

Simulated and real imagery of the solar corona during the April 2024 total solar eclipse. The image on the left is simulated using software from Predictive Science Inc., relying on solar magnetic field data taken in the days leading up the eclipse. The central image shows an actual image of the solar corona on the day of the eclipse. The final image shows a further-updated simulation. The simulations share many of the major structural features of the real image. [Jon Linker/Predictive Science Inc.]

Continuing the theme of predicting solar behavior, our final presentation of the day was “A Near-Real-Time Data-Assimilative Model of the Solar Corona,” given by Jon Linker of Predictive Science Inc. Linker spoke about the work his team has been doing to work towards solar corona models that are informed by near real-time solar observations. They used custom magnetohydrodynamics code which, informed by real measurements of the Sun’s magnetic field, can model the behavior of magnetic field lines in different regions of the Sun and subsequently predict the general structure of the corona and its evolution through time. The team demonstrated their model’s capabilities by running it with real-time input for 32 days leading up to the April 2024 total solar eclipse and showing that they were indeed able to predict many of the overall features of the corona during totality. Linker hopes that this sort of modeling will become more common, mirroring how weather prediction on Earth relies on real-time data inputs from satellites.

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: Exoplanets in Multi-Star Systems, David Ciardi (NASA Exoplanet Science Institute-Caltech-IPAC) (by Kerry Hensley)

The first of three back-to-back plenary sessions was given by David Ciardi, the deputy director of the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute. Ciardi described what we’ve learned about the properties of planets in multi-star systems and compared them to single-star systems.

Though our solar system contains only one star, many stars have companions: essentially all stars with spectral types O, B, and A have companions, as do 50% of F, G, and K stars and 25% of M stars. On average, every star also has a planet, which means that a rather large number of planets must occupy systems with more than one star.

As Ciardi explained, the presence of stellar companions affects how we detect and characterize planets. Many exoplanets are discovered via the transit method, in which a planet blocks some of the light from its host star as seen from our perspective. If the host star has an unknown companion, the planet radius derived from the transit method can be underestimated by a factor of two or more — and the planet might even orbit the unseen star instead of the star that’s being studied!

Using transit fitting, researchers have developed ways to determine which star in a binary or multiple system a planet is orbiting. These methods suggest that most planets orbit the primary star in the system. This is likely a result of observational bias, because primary stars are typically brighter, and it’s easier to detect a planet around a brighter star. However, a nonzero fraction of planets have been found to orbit the secondary stars of their systems, with more waiting to be found.

In terms of how binarity affects the likelihood of a star hosting planets, studies have shown that roughly 20% of single stars host giant planets, compared to just 10–12% of binary stars. However, wide binaries (orbital separations greater than 100 au) host giant planets at essentially the same rate as single stars, while close binaries host giant planets at a greatly reduced rate. In contrast, research suggests that wide and close binaries might host small planets at approximately the same rate.

Researchers have also discovered a small but growing number of planets in extremely close binary systems that are orbiting both stars at once. Estimates suggest that 10–40% of close binaries might have circumbinary planets, but this number is still uncertain. Recent findings suggest that essentially all of these systems are aligned, with the orbit of the planet in the same plane as the orbits of the stars.

Finally, Ciardi noted that while finding small planets is already difficult, the presence of a stellar companion makes it even more difficult. Research shows that we’re likely sensitive to only about 50% of Neptune-size planets in binary systems and scarcely any Earth-size planets. Combining this information with existing observations suggests that there are likely 10–30% more small planets in our galaxy than previous estimates that don’t account for binarity have suggested.

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: Unraveling AGN Feeding and Feedback: JWST, ALMA, and Integral Field Spectrometers to the Rescue, Erin Hicks (University of Alaska Anchorage) (by Maggie Verrico)

Professor Erin Hicks from the University of Alaska Anchorage gave the second plenary talk of the session. She highlighted several recent results by the Galaxy Activity, Torus, and Outflow Survey (GATOS) collaboration on active galactic nucleus fueling and feedback mechanisms which were made possible by high-resolution instruments like the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) and JWST.

diagram of the unified model of active galactic nuclei

A diagram of the unified model of active galactic nuclei, showing an accretion disk, dusty torus, and jets. [B. Saxton NRAO/AUI/NSF; CC BY 4.0]

We think all massive galaxies host central supermassive black holes, some of which are actively accreting material — so-called “active galactic nuclei.” These active galactic nuclei are connected to their host galaxies by a complex fueling structure that funnels gas in the galaxy down to the supermassive black hole’s accretion disk. Under the “unified theory of active galactic nuclei,” that accretion disk is surrounded by a donut-shaped structure called the “dusty torus,” which can obstruct certain sightlines toward the active galactic nucleus. Professor Hicks’ work has been to complicate our model of the dusty torus; instead of a small, donut-shaped dusty structure, the work she highlighted has revealed that the torus is a large and dynamically complex interface between the accreting black hole and the nucleus of its host galaxy. She emphasized the importance of the torus as both a site of active galactic nucleus fueling by gas inflows and where feedback drives gas outflows which can have a huge impact on the host galaxy.

Professor Hicks first highlighted several studies of individual active galactic nucleus hosts in the nearby universe to demonstrate that active black holes can have very different relationships with their host galaxies, even when they are similar in luminosity. In particular, she discussed how the relative orientation between the torus and the host galaxy is crucial for understanding active galactic nucleus feedback. When the torus is aligned with the host galaxy, the active galactic nucleus drives outflows perpendicular to the plane of the galactic disk, sometimes inducing star formation outside the galactic disk (so-called “positive active galactic nucleus feedback”; seen in this work by GATOS collaborator Laura Hermosa Muñoz). On the other hand, when the torus is perpendicular to the plane of the disk, the active galactic nucleus drives outflows that deplete the molecular gas in the central region of the galaxy. In theory, this should drive “negative active galactic nucleus feedback,” a process by which the active black hole limits star formation in its host.

Professor Hicks hinted at future work regarding this active galactic nucleus–host galaxy coupling, particularly in finding ways to test how well-coupled the black hole system is with the host galaxy molecular gas reservoir. She highlighted a recently submitted work by her graduate student Lulu Zhang studying different ionized emission lines as a tracer of the chemical and physical qualities of gas in the nucleus around active black holes. She also discussed the need for population studies which can reveal larger patterns in behavior, like this article by Santiago Garcia-Burillo that uses decades of ALMA observations to find evidence of feedback in the central 50 parsecs of high-luminosity active galactic nucleus hosts. These high-resolution datasets will be crucial for understanding the complex relationship between active galactic nuclei, their dusty tori, and the galaxies in which they live.

Return to Table of Contents.


SPD Plenary: González Hernández Prize Lecture: Solar Connections: Reflecting and Leaning Forward, Holly R. Gilbert (High Altitude Observatory/NCAR) (by Lexi Gault)

Dr. Holly R. Gilbert was awarded the inaugural Irene González Hernández Prize, which recognizes mid-career scientists for their outstanding contributions to the field of solar physics. This award, as Dr. Gilbert began her talk acknowledging, honors the memory of Irene González Hernández, a solar physicist remembered for her significant contributions and dedication to the solar physics community.

Following this recognition, Dr. Gilbert provided an overview of her career path that she fondly referred to as a “random walk.” Having originally planned to become a concert cellist, Gilbert was drawn to astronomy and decided to pursue a career as a solar physicist. Interested and inspired by images of the Sun, she wanted to understand how it worked and what mechanisms were behind this extremely close star.

extreme-ultraviolet image of the Sun

An example of a solar prominence. If this prominence were viewed against the Sun’s disk, the relatively cool plasma would appear dark against the solar surface. [NASA/STEREO]

In particular, Dr. Gilbert was interested in understanding how prominences worked. Solar prominences are bright filaments of material extending from the surface of the Sun into the corona that follow along the Sun’s magnetic field. During the earlier stages of her career, she used observations of solar prominences to guide new physical insights about these features. Along with collaborators, Gilbert modeled and measured the mass of material involved in observed prominences, finding that down flow of neutral hydrogen and helium leads to mass loss within the structures. These processes can impact the evolution of prominences and show that the Sun’s magnetic field governs interactions of the solar surface and in the corona.

From here, Dr. Gilbert discussed the importance of continuing to study the Sun’s magnetic field and how understanding the corona and solar surface will allow for better predictions and monitoring of solar weather. She highlighted a number of proposed missions including the Chromospheric Magnetism Explorer (CMEx), the Coronal Solar Magnetism Observatory (COSMO), and the Next Generation Global Oscillations Network Group (ngGONG), which would all aid in understanding space weather, unlocking huge discoveries and advancing the field of solar physics. However, Gilbert acknowledged that looking toward the future in the current climate is hard. All of these planned missions and hopes for advanced science are at risk, but she charged the community to stay resilient and work together in order to continue doing the impactful and critical science we are passionate about.

Return to Table of Contents.

galaxy cluster

Editor’s Note: This week we’re at the 246th AAS meeting in Anchorage, AK, and online. Along with a team of authors from Astrobites, we will be writing updates on selected events at the meeting and posting each day. Follow along here or at astrobites.com for daily summaries, or follow @astrobites.bsky.social on Bluesky for more coverage. The usual posting schedule for AAS Nova will resume on June 16th.

Table of Contents:


Fred Kavli Plenary Lecture: Unveiling the First 500 Myr of the Universe with CEERS, Steven Finkelstein (University of Texas, Austin) (by Olivia Cooper)

Kicking off Day 1 of AAS 246, Professor Steve Finkelstein (UT Austin) gave his prize plenary titled “Unveiling the First 500 Myr of the Universe with CEERS.” In it, he shared the stories and surprises of CEERS (Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey), one of the earliest programs with JWST, comprised of an international team of extragalactic astronomers led by Prof. Finkelstein. Though he admittedly “suffered from a lack of imagination” at first and supposed the survey would merely confirm past assumptions about galaxy evolution, instead CEERS has uncovered new mysteries about galaxies in the very early universe.

Prof. Finkelstein’s main scientific goal is to find out when the lights first turned on, or when galaxies formed out of the cosmic dark ages. To understand this beginning of everything, Finkelstein and his team work to observe galaxies at earlier and earlier times, count them up, and investigate what they look like. With the longer wavelength coverage and sensitivity of JWST, we can push this galaxy counting technique to even earlier times, within the first few 100 million years (of about 14 billion years from the Big Bang to now). Even in the first few days after receiving the first data from CEERS (see Figure 1), the team found a few surprises, all of which have since held up: the early universe is full of (1) too many unexpectedly bright galaxies, (2) galaxies that are too massive, and (3) lots of accreting supermassive black holes. With more detailed data coming in from spectroscopic follow-up programs, the team is now working towards confirming these galaxy puzzles, and eventually determining the physical origins of the seemingly rapidly evolving early universe.

images of CEERS data

A few team members looking at some of the first data from CEERS at the TACC visualization lab at UT Austin. The image is full of galaxies, and is displayed over multiple screens spanning the room, with the scientists’ silhouettes appearing over the image. [R. Larson]

Throughout his talk, Finkelstein shared his appreciation for the CEERS team and continually promoted the work of junior scientists (including Katherine Chworowsky, Rebecca Larson, Mic Bagley, Alexa Morales, Pablo Arrabal Haro, and more). He emphasized that it is an explicit goal of CEERS to enable tons of science within the broader astronomy community, and pointed us to the CEERS survey paper and website, where you can download data products and find detailed jupyter notebooks to reduce JWST data. Lastly, Finkelstein reminded us that to support our community in light of the ongoing threat to science in the US, it is essential to be vigilant in our resistance.

Return to Table of Contents.


Press Conference: Cosmic Accelerators and Active Black Holes (by Lucas Brown) (Briefing video)

This press conference session marked the very first of the meeting, and featured five presentations covering various exciting developments in the study of our universe’s biggest and brightest natural particle accelerators.

The first of these presentations, “Multimessenger Probes of Galactic PeVatrons,” was given by Shuo Zhang from Michigan State University. PeVatrons are, broadly speaking, any astrophysical source that is able to accelerate particles to PeV-scale energies. These are thought to include pulsar wind nebulae, supernova remnants, molecular cloud interactions, star-forming regions, and various black hole systems. Zhang shared that her team recently identified a pulsar wind nebula candidate that was spatially associated with an energetic cosmic-ray event detected by the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHASSO) known as J0343+5254u. They believe this system could be the source of this particular high-energy event. Additionally, Zhang shared that her team has launched new searches for PeVatron star-forming regions using the IceCube neutrino detector. The full press release can be found here.

galaxy cluster PLCK G287.0+32.9

A composite image of the galaxy cluster PLCK G287.0+32.9 shown in radio and X-ray emission is displayed. The X-ray signal shines strongest in a central spherical region, while the radio is offset and in the form of two large arcs. [X-ray: NASA/CXC/CfA/K. Rajpurohit et al.; Optical: PanSTARRS; Radio: SARAO/MeerKAT; Image processing: NASA/CXC/SAO/N. Wolk]

Next up was “Where Giants Collide: Particle Acceleration in the Universe’s Largest Structures,” presented by Kamlesh Rajpurohit from the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian. Whereas the previous presentation focused on grand cosmic accelerators that exist within our own galaxy, the focus here was on something a bit larger in size: galaxy clusters. When these clusters — which constitute some of the largest structures in the universe — collide, they release an incredible amount of energy. Rajpurohit’s group recently discovered a vast radio emission cloud filling the entire volume of the galaxy cluster PLCK G287, the largest ever observed. Such persistent and voluminous radio emission requires the continual acceleration of electrons throughout the cluster, which Rajpurohit’s team believes may be sourced from shocks and turbulence in the diffuse gas between galaxies. The full press release can be found here.

Third, in “Chandra Reveals Two Distant Quasars Transforming Universe’s First Light into High-Energy X-Ray Jets,” Jaya Maithil from the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian talked about quasars, which are the brightest objects in the entire universe. She shared that her team identified two quasars in the early universe (with the light from them originating only 3 billion years after the Big Bang). Quasars from this era are important to understand because this cosmic epoch is when star formation and quasar activity is thought to have peaked. These quasars were detectable thanks to the exceptional power of the Chandra X-ray Observatory and the quasars’ ability to boost cosmic microwave background photons to X-ray energies due to their strong jets. In one of the quasars, the team found that the jet contributed a whopping half of the quasar’s entire energy output, the equivalent of 10 trillion suns! This discovery will hopefully shed light (literally) on the role of quasars in shaping galactic environments in the early universe. The full press release can be found here.

Finally, in “Multi-Phase Shocks and Feedback in a Nearby Spiral Galaxy Revealed by JWST Imaging,” Travis Fischer from the Space Telescope Science Institute informed us on JWST’s new insights into the role of shocks and active galactic nucleus feedback within galaxies. This work focused specifically on a nearby galaxy NGC 4258. While radio emission features in this galaxy have long been assumed to result from active galactic nucleus jets, JWST’s high-resolution observations of substructure in the galaxy for various different materials like iron or dust grains makes the jet-origin scenario less likely. Instead, Fischer’s team believes that a slower-moving active galactic nucleus wind provides a better explanation for the distribution of materials along the regions where radio emission is observed, supporting the idea that extended radio features in galaxies may not always be the result of jets as previously assumed.

Hubble and JWST images of NGC 4258

This collage features three views of Messier 106, also known as NGC 4258. The first two images show the target in visible light as seen by Kitt Peak National Observatory and the Hubble Space Telescope. The image on the right is from JWST in the infrared. [ESA/Webb, NASA & CSA, J. Glenn, KPNO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA, the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA), R. Gendler, M.T. Patterso, T.A. Rector, D. de Martin & M. Zamani; CC BY 4.0]

Return to Table of Contents.


Helen B. Warner Prize Lecture: Magnetism and Morphology: Decoding the Interstellar Medium, Susan Clark (Stanford University) (by Karthik Yadavalli)

This session, chaired by Grant Tremblay, was the lecture given by Dr. Susan Clark after receiving the Helen B. Warner Prize Lecture. Dr. Clark gave a detailed overview of the interstellar medium (ISM) and how the galactic magnetic field permeates through it. She detailed how the magnetic field can be probed through Faraday rotation, synchrotron radiation polarization of starlight, and polarization of dust emission. One of the key findings presented by Dr. Clark is that the distribution of the magnetic field in the ISM is correlated with the distribution of neutral hydrogen in the ISM. It turns out that even though the neutral hydrogen component isn’t charged, a very small fraction (~10-4) of that hydrogen is actually ionized, allowing the magnetic field to couple to the gas. Therefore, Dr. Clark and her group are able to learn about dust polarization from observations of the neutral hydrogen density and velocity fields.

map of neutral hydrogen velocity field

The velocity field of neutral hydrogen overlaid with the direction of the magnetic field. Color gives the observed line-of-sight velocity and the contours give the direction of the magnetic field. The two are correlated over this patch of the sky. [Adapted from Ade et al. 2023]

Using this, her group is able to train a neural network in this paper that is able to decompose the ISM into the warm and cool components, literally from just an image of the neutral hydrogen map.

interstellar material decomposed into cold, warm, and noise components

A decomposition of the interstellar material into a cold component (top), warm component (middle), and residual noise (bottom) using an autoencoder. [Adapted from Lei et al. 2025]

Return to Table of Contents.


Press Conference: From Molecules to Molecular Clouds: Discoveries in the Milky Way (by Olivia Cooper) (Briefing video)

This press conference covered recent findings within our home Milky Way galaxy, from the detection of complex dust molecules, to the emergence of elusive stellar activity, to advances in techniques for mapping the galaxy’s gaseous disk.

cyanocoronene molecule

Artist’s rendition of the cyanocoronene molecule, which has seven interconnected benzene rings and a cyano group. [NSF/AUI/NSF NRAO/P.Vosteen; CC BY 4.0]

First up was “If You Like It Put More Rings on It: Discovery of Interstellar Cyanocoronene” by Gabi Wenzel (MIT/Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian). Wenzel and her team utilized laboratory spectra and observations from the Green Bank Telescope in tandem to discover interstellar cyanocoronene (see Figure 1), the largest polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) molecule ever detected in an interstellar environment. PAHs are a type of dust that contributes to many processes related to star and planet formation, and this detection provides new context regarding the chemical origins and evolution of the cosmos. The full press release can be found here.

Next, in “Discovery of the Elusive Radio Burst Indicators of Massive Eruptions in a Young Active Star,” Atul Mohan (NASA-GSFC/The Catholic University of America) presented the first detection of coronal mass ejection–associated radio bursts in an active star. He noted that though these bursts of radio emission are expected alongside these energetic stellar eruptions, they have not yet been detected in a decades-long search until now, primarily due to line-of-sight effects given that the radio emission is localized.

In “The Spotty Surface of the Blue Giant Xi Persei,” Tahina Ramiaramanantsoa (Arizona State University) showed the second case of bright spots discovered on a massive star. These spots are unexpected for massive stars as they have fundamentally different structures than the Sun, where such spots are typically seen. Through time–frequency analysis of 13 years of space-based observations from small and large satellites, the team found that the spots come and go, but their origin remains unknown.

Peter Craig (Michigan State University) took us from individual molecules and stars to the larger structure of the Milky Way in “A Map of the Outer Gas Disk of the Galaxy with Direct Distances from Young Stars.” Given our viewpoint from within the galaxy, it is challenging to construct a complete map of the gaseous disk of the Milky Way, which we know must have a complex structure. In the past, astronomers have used the motions of the gas relative to our position to infer the structure from a top-down view. However, it is prohibitively challenging to measure the distance to each parcel of gas, meaning these conversions can suffer from inaccuracies. In their recent work, Craig and team demonstrated a new technique to map the disk more accurately and completely: first, they measure the motion of the gas, then, assuming young stars remain near their natal gaseous clouds, measure distances to the stars to estimate the distance to the gas. This has resulted in more accurate maps, which reveal fluffy spiral structures in the galaxy’s gas disk. See the full press release here.

infrared images of the center of the Milky Way

Infrared images of the galactic center, showing gas and dust clouds illuminated in red and blue with a few bright red or blue stars embedded in the clouds. Two star forming regions that were studied are shown as zoomed-in insets, where hot, blue massive stars are seen causing the gas clouds to glow. [J. De Buizer (SETI) / SOFIA / Spitzer / Herschel]

Closing out the session, Wanggi Lim (Caltech/IPAC) presented “The SOFIA Mid-Infrared Giant H II Region Survey: Galactic Center.” This work provides the best and most recent view of ongoing massive star formation in the galactic center using the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) telescope, an airplane-borne infrared instrument. The central region of our galaxy is thought to have relatively dampened star formation activity, where only a single generation of stars may have formed. While the team found generally consistent results with this notion (Figure 2), they also found a potentially new type of stellar nursery, where star formation rates are low, but the fuel for future star formation remains. The full press release can be found here.

Return to Table of Contents.


George Ellery Hale Prize Lecture: Why are the Coronae of the Sun and Other Stars so Darned Hot?, James Klimchuk (NASA GSFC) (by Karthik Yadavalli)

This session, chaired by Dawn Gelino, was the lecture given by Dr. James Klimchuk after receiving the George Ellery Hale Prize Lecture. In this talk, Dr. Klimchuk specifically wanted to present about three different studies he did recently, each on three different approaches: observational, theoretical, computational. The guiding question about his research is why the Sun’s corona is so hot. Dr. Klimchuk presented what must be the story of how the corona is structured and heated in this way. Magnetic field lines travel through the solar photosphere, loop through the corona, and loop back into the photosphere. Dynamics of the plasma in the photosphere move around the “foot points” of the magnetic field lines, causing the field lines to get twisted with each other. This twisting causes the field lines to suddenly “snap,” releasing a burst of energy. This energy is thought to heat the corona.

ultraviolet image of the Sun

Left: A representative ultraviolet image of the Sun, showing the magnetic field loops in the corona. Right: A zoom in on one active region where a lot of energy can be emitted into the corona. [Slide by James Klimchuk]

The first study he presented was the observational one, which found that the magnetic field loops must have circular cross sections. The second study was a numerical (simulation) study that actually simulated the “snap” of magnetic field lines and showed how much energy comes out from the simulation. The third study is an order-of-magnitude theoretical study that explains why the magnetic fields suddenly reconnect after slowly building up magnetic pressure.

simulation schematic and flux from a flux tube cross section

Left: A schematic of the simulation, showing the field tube. Right: The flux emitted along one cross section of the field tube as it “snaps.” This flux heats the solar corona. [Slide by James Klimchuk]

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: Supernovae: The Ultimate Laboratories of Extreme Astrophysics, Danny “Dan” Milisavljevic (Purdue University) (by Lucas Brown)

For our final plenary lecture of the day, we heard from Dr. Danny Milisavljevic. His talk was focused on our modern understanding of supernovae, particularly from the perspective of analyzing supernova remnants within our own galaxy. As Milisavljevic pointed out early in his talk, while supernovae go off with regular frequency in galaxies all throughout our universe, these events are so distant that we can only get so much out of our observations of them. On the other hand, supernovae within our own galaxy are too infrequent to make regular observations of, meaning we have to rely on observing their remnants many hundreds or thousands of years after the initial explosion. This leaves open a lot of difficult questions regarding what features in remnants can be attributed to the explosion itself as opposed to interactions between the environment and ejected material, as well as questions about how to evolve supernova models through hundreds of years.

Dan Milisavljevic speaks at AAS 246

Dan Milisavljevic speaks at AAS 246. [Lucas Brown]

In order to reduce these uncertainties as much as possible, it’s helpful to study supernova remnants that are as young as possible. The prime example Milisavljevic focused on was Cassiopeia A — a supernova that likely went off in the mid 1600s and is particularly close to us (it’s a measly 11,000 light-years away!). Several prominent features of Cassiopeia A were highlighted, including the clear spatial separation of elements of different masses, outward and inward shock fronts, bubbles, rings, and more — all of which could be explained by computer simulations or fairly well-established physics. In the era of JWST, our understanding of this system has deepened, while other questions have opened up. For example, JWST observations unveiled a previously invisible substructure of gas dubbed the “green monster” for its strong appearance in green imaging filters. Additionally, researchers uncovered a web-like structure within the central region of the remnant, which Milisavljevic believes could be un-shocked ejecta material. On a final note, Milisavljevic provided a tantalizing preview of what could be the future of supernova science: a network of neutrino and gravitational wave detectors forewarning us about a supernova in our own galaxy before it even goes off, allowing telescopes around the world to observe the explosion in real time! But until then, we can still enjoy some beautiful images of their ancient afterglow.

Return to Table of Contents.

AAS 246 banner

This week, AAS Nova and Astrobites are attending the American Astronomical Society (AAS) summer meeting in Anchorage, AK.

AAS Nova Editor Kerry Hensley and AAS Media Fellow Lexi Gault will join Astrobites Media Interns Lucas Brown and Maggie Verrico along with Astrobiters Olivia Cooper and Karthik Yadavalli to live-blog the meeting for all those who aren’t attending or can’t make it to all the sessions they’d like. We plan to cover all of the plenaries and press conferences, so follow along here on aasnova.org or on astrobites.org! You can also follow Astrobites on Bluesky at astrobites.bsky.social for more meeting content.

Where can you find us during the meeting? We’ll be at the Astrobites booth in the Exhibit Hall all week — stop by and say hello! You can also find Kerry and Lexi at the press conferences Monday through Wednesday, with AAS Nova Editor Susanna Kohler assisting online. AAS press conferences are open to all in-person and virtual meeting attendees, and they can also be viewed on the AAS Press Office YouTube channel for anyone not attending the meeting.

Finally, you can read the currently published AAS 246 keynote speaker interviews, which were conducted by Astrobiters Neev Shah, Lucas Brown, Maria Vincent, Sowkhya Shanbhog, Maggie Verrico, and Karthik Yadavalli. Be sure to check back all week as the remainder are released!


Education, Outreach, and More at AAS 246

AAS 246 features a broad range of sessions related to education and outreach. For a comprehensive and curated list of sessions, check out this post from AAS Education Program Manager Tom Rice. Here are a few highlights (all times AKDT; must be logged in to aas.org for links to work correctly):

Monday will kick things off with multiple education-related poster sessions in the Exhibit Hall from 9:00 to 10:00 am. This poster session will immediately be followed by the Education and Public Engagement oral session from 10:00 to 11:30 am, and there will be an eclipse-related special session from 2:00 to 3:30 pm. Close out your day at 49th State Brewing with an informal gathering of astronomy educators starting at 7:30 pm; RSVP here (optional but encouraged).

Tuesday begins with an education-related special session, Sharing Astronomy with Blind and Low Vision Audiences, from 10:00 to 11:30 am, immediately followed by an outreach event at the Anchorage Museum from 11:30 am to 1:30 pm. This event will feature a Sun observation table, solar telescopes, live music, and more; learn more about the event here. In the afternoon, check out the education-related parallel oral sessions Undergraduate Research with the Rubin Observatory and Moving Toward Mutuality in Astronomy Today from 2:00 to 3:30 pm.

On Wednesday, you can take your pick of six education-related parallel sessions, three in the morning from 10:00 to 11:30 am and three in the afternoon from 2:00 to 3:30 pm.

Thursday begins with three education-related poster sessions, Education and Public Outreach, Education Research, and Community and Profession, from 9:00 to 10:00 am in the Exhibit Hall. Finally, be sure to stick around for the closing plenary from 11:40 am to 12:30 pm, “The Current Landscape for Science Policy and How YOU Can Make a Difference.”

AAS 246 banner

Hundreds of astronomers are soon to assemble in Anchorage, AK, for the 246th meeting of the American Astronomical Society. The AAS Publishing team looks forward to connecting with meeting attendees, and you can find various members of the publishing and journals’ editorial staff at the AAS booth in the Exhibit Hall in the Dena’ina Civic & Convention Center. Ethan Vishniac (AAS Journals Editor in Chief) and Frank Timmes (Associate Editor in Chief and Lead Editor of the High Energy Phenomena and Fundamental Physics research corridor) will be available at the booth throughout the week, and Kerry Kroffe (AAS Director of Scholarly Publishing) will be staffing the booth on Wednesday and Thursday. Be sure to stop by the AAS booth in the Exhibit Hall to say hello, chat about the journals, and pick up some swag! While the trio of AAS data editors won’t be present at this meeting, they’re just an email away; reach out to data-editors@aas.org to have your data questions answered.

AAS Nova Editor Kerry Hensley, AAS Media Fellow Lexi Gault, Astrobites Media Interns Lucas Brown and Maggie Verrico, and the rest of the Astrobites team will also be available periodically at the Astrobites booth in the Exhibit Hall, while AAS Nova Editor Susanna Kohler will be available via the AAS 246 Slack workspace. We look forward to seeing you there!


Open Science at AAS 246

Note: The links in this section take you to the corresponding entries in the AAS 246 block schedule. You must be logged in for the links to work correctly; otherwise, they will take you to the main block schedule page.

Looking to learn more about open science? Here are a few sessions to get you acquainted. On Tuesday, the oral session “Open Science & Computation, Data Handling, and Image Analysis” will be held from 10:00 to 11:30 am AKDT in the Dena’ina Civic & Convention Center, Tubughnenq’ 4. This session will cover everything from the sonification of galaxy images to enable aural classification of galaxies to a spectroscopic data reduction pipeline that is being tuned to process JWST data.

Wednesday’s oral session “Community and Profession,” held from 10:00 to 11:30 AKDT in Dena’ina Civic & Convention Center, Tubughnenq’ 4, will also cover a broad range of topics. Of particular interest are a discussion of the past successes and future plans of the multi-institution Solar wind with Hydrogen Ion charge Exchange and Large-Scale Dynamics (SHIELD) DRIVE Science Center, which aims to advance our understanding of the heliosphere while broadening the heliospheric community; a presentation about the LightSound project, which continues to make solar eclipses more accessible to the blind and low-vision community; and an exploration of how the principles of architectural Universal Design can be used to make astronomy more accessible. This talk will include a description of how these principles can be applied to academic departments, conferences, and outreach and will offer guiding questions for departments wanting to become more accessible to those with disabilities.

Finally, on Thursday from 1:00 to 2:00 pm AKDT in the Dena’ina Civic & Convention Center Exhibit Hall, there will be a poster session on “Computation, Data Handling, Image Analysis.” These posters will focus on improving astronomical search algorithms, tools for background subtraction, high-precision image alignment, and more.

logo of the American Astronomical Society

Editor’s Note: This week, the Research Notes of the AAS (RNAAS) — a free-to-publish outlet ideal for timely observations, student work, and null results — published its 2,000th Research Note. Editor Chris Lintott shares his thoughts on this milestone below.
Chris Lintott headshot

RNAAS editor Chris Lintott

I have the most interesting job in astronomy. Most mornings, just as the first coffee of the day is hitting the system, I open my AAS email and find a fresh Research Note sitting there. The variety is limited only by the creativity of our community; last week I handled updated observations of an intriguing planetary system, the categorisation of obscured active galactic nuclei, an updated catalogue of 50 million stars, and even a speculative piece on floating islands of lava on the surface of planet-consuming red dwarfs.

RNAAS is designed to be a simple place to publish, so these pieces in all their variety are moderated rather than peer reviewed, usually by me and that coffee, but occasionally by my colleagues across the AAS Journals editorial team. RNAAS‘s purpose is to get information of interest into the formal record quickly, without paying attention to notability. With a few exceptions (mostly for novel theory, which really does need peer review), if you have an astronomical result (even, perhaps especially, a null result), observation, or fact to write down, RNAAS will take it.

This week we published the 2,000th Note since RNAAS started back in 2017 (an interesting study of dual active galactic nuclei — galaxies with twin black holes — by Colton Burross and Krista Smith of Texas A&M University), and some modest self-congratulation is in order. Looking back over the 2,000 Notes, some themes emerge; we’ve clearly been successful in encouraging students on summer placements to submit, giving many of them a first formal publication, and the desire for large, growing, and updated catalogues across astronomy is increasingly being serviced by the rapid publication afforded by RNAAS.

That said, it is the sheer variety of submissions that stands out. From the contents of Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar’s correspondence and observations of sunspots in 1791, to 128 new moons of Saturn, to guides on advanced statistics, the range is astonishing.

We have every intention of keeping RNAAS going as a free service to the astronomical community. But on this special occasion, if you are one of the authors who have contributed to our 2,000 Notes, then I want to say thanks. If not, then please consider if you have a thought that might be presented in a few pages (and one figure or table!). In either case, all of you are invited to do what I do, and start your day by browsing RNAAS with a coffee.

Chris Lintott
Editor, Research Notes of the AAS

Want to start your day with RNAAS?
Click here to learn how to receive alerts when new Research Notes are published.

logo of the American Astronomical Society

Are you an astronomer considering submitting a manuscript to an AAS journal (i.e., AJ, ApJ, ApJ Letters, ApJ Supplements, or PSJ)? If so, this post is for you! Read on to find out about the exciting new things you can do with the AAS’s newest LaTeX class file, available for download now.

Why the Update?

AAS publishing has maintained a consistent class file for LaTeX manuscript preparation for nearly two decades. But academic publishing continues to change rapidly! As the AAS has added new publishing capabilities based on the recommendations of the Journals Task Force and the needs and requests of AAS authors, the class file that authors use to prepare their manuscripts has also needed to change. The newest version of AASTeX, v7.0, is built entirely from scratch and will accommodate a variety of new features to make preparing manuscripts for publication a simpler process.

What’s New in AASTeX 7.0?

There are many exciting new features and capabilities in AASTeX 7.0. Here are four of the biggest changes:

  • New metadata components in the \author command
    Want more freedom in how you express your name on your manuscript? In addition to linking to your ORCID profile, authors can now specify surnames (family or last names), given names (personal or first names), and suffixes while still expressing their full names as they want in the compiled PDF.
  • Changes in how the \email command works
    Starting soon, submitters will need to provide email addresses for all authors on a manuscript. In AASTeX v7.0, it’s now easy to include these within each author block with the \email command. A new error message will alert you when emails are missing.
  • A new .bst file for inline citation changes and titles in PSJ
    AAS journals have made two recent style changes to how citations appear in articles: inline citations now include first initials (e.g., “G. Smith et al. (2022)”) in all AAS journals, and article titles have been added to references in Planetary Science Journal articles. The .bst file in AASTeX v7.0 reproduces these style changes.
  • A new environment command for specifying author contributions
    screenshot showing a sample author contribution section in AASTex v7

    A sample author contribution section generated using AASTeX v7.0.

    Wish you had a way to briefly explain the individual contributions of your manuscript’s authors? There’s a new feature for that, and you’re encouraged to use it to make sure your coauthors get the credit they deserve. Like the acknowledgments environment, this environment is anonymized when dual anonymous review is used. And don’t worry, this section won’t be included in your word count!

Where Can You Get More Information?

Wishing for Still More Improvements?

The AAS publishing team would love your input! You can contact them at aastex-help@aas.org with additional suggestions or ideas for the next iteration of AASTeX.

dwarf galaxy Leo P

Editor’s Note: This week we’re at the 245th AAS meeting in National Harbor, MD, and online. Along with a team of authors from Astrobites, we will be writing updates on selected events at the meeting and posting each day. Follow along here or at astrobites.com for daily summaries, or follow @astrobites.bsky.social on Bluesky for more coverage. The usual posting schedule for AAS Nova will resume on January 21st.

Table of Contents:


Plenary Lecture: The Star Formation Engine, Stella Offner (University of Texas, Austin) (by Jessie Thwaites)

“The story of a star’s life is written at birth,” says Dr. Offner, whose plenary lecture describes the details of numerical simulations to understand the birth and evolution of stars in our Universe. She and her team in the STARFORGE project have created some beautiful animations of their simulation output, which made for riveting visuals in her talk (they also publish them on their website, so check their movies out here!).

She begins with the stellar initial mass function (IMF), which is known from observations but that they want to describe with their simulation from first principles. It’s a difficult problem to solve — there are multiple scales and many processes at play, and although we have incredible observations from JWST for star forming regions like the Carina Nebula, which is actively forming thousands of stars, this is only a single snapshot in time.

The star formation engine is a process with many scales, starting from a molecular cloud in a galaxy, which has a dense core region with an accretion disk. A forming star may have a protostellar outflow or a wind bubble, depending on its size, and when it eventually goes supernova it launches material back into the galaxy, beginning the process over again. Dr. Offner’s simulations need to cover 10 orders of magnitude in space and 20 orders of magnitude in density (that means that if the smallest region is of order 1 in both space and density, making simulations that consistently model regions that are 10,000,000,000 larger and 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 times more dense, and everything in between) — a huge feat! To do this, they use Frontera supercomputers and hydrodynamic codes to attack this challenge.

Their codes include a variety of processes, from physics models for self-gravity (which tell them how the gas interacts with itself), magnetic fields, and turbulence, to stellar feedback mechanisms such as protostellar outflows, stellar winds, radiation, and supernovae. They combine these with important microphysics considerations, including heating and cooling mechanisms and cosmic rays.

In one animation, they begin with a cloud of gas 10 parsecs across and initial turbulence conditions. As the simulation evolves, complex structures begin to emerge, and the first protostars form. The protostars begin to have outflows reaching hundreds of kilometers per second, and as more stars form, they begin to form and interact with each other in clusters. The first high-mass stars begin to interact, and eventually slow down due to feedback and supernovae from these massive stars, until the center of the cloud can be revealed in optical light. Through this process they are able to reproduce the IMF conditions, and even with 15 more simulations they find a very similar IMF, reproducing the observed IMF.

One of the elements that is new in these simulations but is incredibly important, Dr. Offner says, is cosmic ray ionization in the clouds. These charged particles are responsible for heating the dense gas and eventually the formation of molecules, which make them especially important to astrochemistry. They find the cosmic ray energy has an impact on the IMF, which leads them to ask if regions with high cosmic ray densities (like the centers of galaxies) might have a different IMF than other regions. To study star formation in galaxies in addition to their simulations, they team up with the FIRE (Feedback in Realistic Environments) simulation team to produce consistent simulations from the galaxy scale down to an accretion disk around a black hole. They find that the IMF does change in their simulations depending on the distance from the center of the galaxy — an important result for understanding how stars form in galaxies.

There is still more work to be done, Dr. Offner says. The simulations can include still more physics models and astrochemistry, important for understanding how chemical compounds and planets form, which is important to studying habitability over time. Trying to follow all of these chemical considerations is too expensive with traditional simulations, but are excellent problems to approach with machine learning. She and her team at the newly established NSF AI Institute for Cosmic Origins are working to understand these problems using robust machine learning techniques.

Return to Table of Contents.


Splinter Session: The Habitable Worlds Observatory: Current Status and Opportunities for Engagement (by Lindsey Gordon)

This splinter session discussed NASA’s next flagship mission after Roman launches, the Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO). This was the main mission recommended by the 2020 decadal survey, and will be a sort of “SuperHubble,” with similar wavelength coverage but a 6–8 meter aperture (Hubble’s aperture is 2.4 meters across). This will be the first instrument capable of directly imaging an Earth-like planet, but any object in the infrared through the ultraviolet can be observed. The mission will have a coronagraph, a high-resolution imager, an ultraviolet multi-object spectrograph, and a not-yet-determined fourth instrument that will be decided on by community demand.

Dr. Makenzie Lystrup, the director of Goddard Space Flight Center, opened the session by thanking everyone who is engaging with HWO. She emphasized the importance of community in the project, both in its development and its long-term usage, and Goddard’s commitment to executing the project on budget and on schedule to produce a mission that will be a major community resource.

We then heard from one of the leads of the Science Community Engagement team. They want to get both the scientific community and the public excited about this mission as it searches for life in the universe. There is an upcoming meeting, HWO25, and they hope to involve the community in the conversations there. The remainder of the session included presentations from the science working groups (Living Worlds, Solar Systems, Evolution of the Elements, and Galaxy Growth), industry partners, “pop” talks from Early Career Researchers, and a mini “Town Hall” with tables from different groups to start discussion.

You can find out more about HWO on their NASA website or by requesting to join their Slack.

Return to Table of Contents.


Splinter Session: A Conversation About the Gemini Observatory Strategic Plan for the 2030s (by Lindsey Gordon)

The Gemini Observatory ran a splinter session to discuss their 2023–2028 improvement plan and the future of the telescope. Scott Dahm, the interim director, discussed the new instruments. GHOST, IGRINS-2, GPI-2, SCORPIO, and GIRMOS are all going online in that timeframe at both the North and South observatories, and these instruments make up a set of new spectrographs and imagers that will improve Gemini’s capabilities. GNAO is the new adaptive optics system for the North observatory and is scheduled to go online in 2028. Gemini is also getting a new proposal writing and execution platform, the Gemini Program Platform, in coming years to streamline and centralize observing.

Gemini’s critical science areas include exoplanets, time domain (transient) astronomy, galaxy science, and star and planet formation. The observatory will play a key role in selecting exoplanet targets for JWST, performing rapid transient followup, and providing advanced adaptive optics for observations.

The science team & NOIRLAB are highly involved in public outreach and community based astronomy. They’re adding a cultural residency program this year, doing anti-light-pollution work to keep Chile’s skies dark, and just celebrated the 20th anniversary of their Journey Through the Universe program reaching thousands of students in Hawai’i. The team is also supporting the transition of the management of Maunakea’s observatories to the Maunakea Stewardship and Oversight Authority.

Return to Table of Contents.


Press Conference: Exoplanets: From Formation to Disintegration (by Lexi Gault) (Briefing video)

An ALMA Survey of Circumstellar Disks in Young Binaries
Taylor Kutra (Lowell Observatory)

Stars and their planets are born out of clouds of gas and dust that collapse over time, but frequently stars are not formed alone but rather in binary pairs or larger groups. In order to understand how planets form in binary star systems, it is important to study the environments where they are born — the circumstellar disks of their host stars. Dr. Kutra presented ALMA (the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array) imaging of the circumstellar disks of binary star system DF Tau. Prior to ALMA imaging, Dr. Kutra thought that only the primary star in the system had a circumstellar disk and any remnant light was noise; however, with the ALMA images it became clear that both stars in the system are surrounded by a disk of gas and dust. These observations provide the basis for future investigations into binary star systems and their journey to forming planets. | Press release

A New NASA Mission to Characterize Exoplanets and Their Host Stars
Ben Hord (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)

Dr. Hord shared updates and science goals from the new NASA Pandora SmallSat Mission that plans to observe and characterize exoplanet host stars and exoplanetary atmospheres. This is a space-based mission, employing a 0.44-meter telescope that can observe simultaneously at visible and near-infrared wavelengths. During its 1-year primary mission, Pandora will observe more than 20 known exoplanet systems, collecting data on the host stars’ light profiles as well as spectra to identify the composition of exoplanet atmospheres. These observations will allow astronomers to better understand exoplanet atmospheric conditions and will aid in the search for habitable planets. Pandora will be able to perform follow up observations on exoplanet candidates observed with JWST and will be a critical tool in the exploration of exoplanetary systems. | Press release

X-Rays in the Prime of Life: Irradiating Vulnerable Planets
Scott Wolk (Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory)

When searching for habitable planets in the galaxy, astronomers often target low-mass main sequence stars (M stars) as they are the most common star type in the galaxy. Dr. Wolk presented observations of M star Wolf 359 that is very bright in the X-ray. This star is about 10% the mass of our Sun and its habitable zone is very close to the star. However, this star is pumping out tons of X-ray radiation that can evaporate an exoplanet’s atmosphere over the course of a couple million years. This is very detrimental to any potentially habitable planet, but Dr. Wolk explained the conditions required for a planet to still be habitable under these conditions. Earth, for example, has a very massive reservoir of liquid water in our oceans, which under these X-ray conditions, could replenish the atmosphere for an extra 600 million years. However, this is still not a very long time for life to develop or persist, and Wolf 359 has emitted multiple flares, which would expose the planet to even more damaging radiation. Is there any hope left? If a planet had a water reservoir equivalent to 11 times the amount of water in Earth’s oceans, it would continue to have an atmosphere, so while not all hope is lost, X-ray emission from M-type stars poses a significant threat to their planetary systems’ habitability. | Press release

Bright Star, Fading World: Dusty Debris of a Dying Planet
Marc Hon (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

In exoplanet systems, if a planet orbits too closely to its host star, the star will heat the planet into an extremely hot ball of lava. A small enough planet, smaller than Earth, is not able to hang onto its atmosphere, and as it orbits its star, the material evaporated from the planet will form a comet-like tail of material trailing behind the planet. Dr. Hon announced the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite discovery of one such disintegrating exoplanet BD+05 4868 Ab. Through their observations, they have found that the planet has a long trailing tail of material and a smaller leading tail. From their measurements, this planet is losing one Moon’s worth of mass every million years, which would destroy a small planet completely. This discovery opens up the realm of dying planets, and we can continue to learn about them with further observations. | Press release (PDF)

JWST Exposes Hot Rock Entrails from a Planet’s Demise
Nick Tusay (Penn State University)

In the theme of dying planets, JWST observations have revealed the disintegrating entrails of planet K2-22b. As Tusay explained, when planets are disintegrating, you can study the composition of their layers as they shed. Using the JWST data, they modeled the compounds in the dust cloud coming from the planet. These models show that the compounds are not consistent with iron-dominated material, suggesting that this planet has not yet been stripped down to its core, and the compounds are not consistent with rock vapor. Looking for other plausible materials, they find their data is most consistent with CO2 and NO, which are “ice” vapors. But how could this planet so close to its star have ice? Tusay suggests that this planet may have formed further out but was thrown inward by a binary star companion. Further observations of similar systems will aid in understanding dying planets and their origins. | Press release (PDF)

Return to Table of Contents.


Dannie Heineman Prize for Astrophysics Lecture: Past, Present, and Future Cosmic Microwave Background Surveys, John E. Carlstrom (University of Chicago) (by Bill Smith)

The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is one of the most important pieces of evidence for our modern understanding of the cosmos, and Dr. John Carlstrom has played a key role in the development of the interferometry techniques and telescopes that led to the precise measurements of the microwave sky we have today. He was awarded the Dannie Heineman Prize for Astrophysics, awarded jointly by the American Institute of Physics and the American Astronomical Society and funded by the Heineman Foundation, for his “pioneering work on microwave interferometry and his leading role in the development of the South Pole Telescope.”

He shared how his own interest in microwave astronomy was born out of studying the Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect, in which microwaves from the CMB are distorted when passing through galaxy clusters en route to Earth. As Dr. Carlstrom said, the SZ effect leaves a “shadow” of sorts in the sky in the microwave spectrum in the vicinity of the most massive objects. Because this “shadow” measures thermal energy, it can be used as a proxy for the mass of the cluster. He recounts building the “SZ Array” with Marshall Joy to take low-brightness images over an extended period of time to successfully measure the SZ effect and use it to calculate cosmological parameters like Omega matter and the Hubble constant.

The next project he focused on was DASI, the Degree Angular Scale Interferometer at the South Pole. From DASI data, Dr. Carlstrom and his team were able to measure the matter power spectrum to a high enough precision to conclude for the first time that dark matter was needed in the very early universe and were able to measure the polarization of the CMB for the first time.

Following this, Dr. Carlstrom discussed the South Pole Telescope (SPT), and the many ways it is groundbreaking. He showed preliminary work of a galaxy cluster catalog developed with SPT data showing the relationship between redshift and cluster mass. He then highlighted multiple results from younger scientists in the collaboration observing transient phenomena, like stellar flares, blazars, and asteroids. Dr. Carlstrom continued by highlighting the importance of polarization and CMB lensing, and how measuring the E modes and B modes would allow insight into the gravitational waves generated by inflation, and thus insight into inflation itself. To measure the B modes, though, would require measuring fluctuations in the CMB on order of 10 nanoKelvin, which is still out of reach, but a new SPT camera being built could lead to a future measurement. He concluded with a quick look to the future, noting that the SPT has multiple datasets over multiple years at this point, and that a new telescope called CMB-S4 is also in the works.

Return to Table of Contents.


Seminar for Science Writers: Bringing the Night Sky to Life: NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory Will Revolutionize the Way We Explore the Cosmos (by Kerry Hensley) (Briefing video)

Thursday afternoon brought a special session for science writers introducing the Vera C. Rubin Observatory. The observatory is currently under construction on Cerro Pachón, a mountain in the Coquimbo region of Chile north of Santiago. There, it is dry, high, and the nights are dark — critical factors for the exceptionally broad and deep science that the observatory will enable. Though the wait for this highly anticipated observatory has been long, the wait is almost over, with the first image to be released this summer and the full science survey to be underway by the end of 2025. The mission of the observatory is to bring the night sky to life, which it will accomplish by scanning the sky for 10 years and creating a time-lapse record of the universe — in other words, the greatest cosmic movie ever made. The observatory is also notable for being the first project of similar scale to incorporate education and public outreach from the project’s inception. “The universe is universal,” and the Rubin team aims for anyone who is interested to be able to get involved through formal education, public outreach, and citizen science.

First up in the seminar was Sandrine Thomas, who got the audience acquainted with the basics of the observatory and its namesake, Vera Rubin. Rubin was an astronomer who provided the first convincing evidence for dark matter and advocated for women in astronomy. Fittingly, the Vera Rubin Observatory is the first major US observatory named for a woman. And don’t forget the name! Though astronomers love acronyms, Thomas emphasized how critical it is not to reduce the observatory’s name to “VRO” (there’s a list of recommended name variations on the observatory’s media page).

Rubin Observatory’s mission is to capture the cosmos, and to do that, it needs a wide field of view, a speedy telescope, and the ability to see faint objects. The 3.5-degree field of view — equivalent to the area of 45 full Moons — and fast-moving 350-ton telescope enable the observatory to take repeated images of the entire southern night sky in 3–4 nights. The observatory boasts a 3,200 megapixel camera — the largest digital camera ever constructed — and six color filters from near-ultraviolet to near-infrared. Looking ahead, the camera installation will take place in March 2025, with first look expected June/July 2025 and the survey expected to start late 2025.

Leanne Guy introduced Rubin’s four key science areas: dark matter and dark energy, Milky Way structure and formation, a census of the solar system, and the changing sky. Designing a survey that can advance our understanding of all four of these areas is challenging, so the team worked collaboratively with the scientific community to set the survey cadence. The result is a survey that will generate 2 million exposures over 10 years, raking in 20 terabytes of data each night. The most frequently surveyed fields, the “deep drilling fields,” will be visited roughly 1,000 times in those 10 years.

The scientific yields are immense: for the Milky Way, the survey will produce a map 1,000 times larger than previous surveys. For our understanding of dark matter and dark energy, the wide field of view and faint object detection will provide an avenue to study these phenomena and explore alternate theories of cosmology. The solar system census will uncover four times more solar system objects than we currently know, changing the game for planetary defense, among other benefits. Finally, Rubin will detect 10 million changes in the night sky every night, uncovering rare events and enabling detailed follow-up observations. Speaking of follow up, Rubin can act as a follow-up facility in its own right, and Guy asserted that the observatory will be ideal for following up on gravitational wave detections.

Tackling the data discussion was Yusra AlSayyad, who demonstrated why an observatory like Rubin couldn’t be built until now: after all, only 20 years ago, we were still getting Netflix via DVDs! The same technology that has allowed streaming and social media to proliferate has also enabled this groundbreaking observatory, which will snap an image every 40 seconds, collecting 60 petabytes (that’s 60 quadrillion bytes) of data in 10 years. In just a single year, the survey will more than double the number of raw optical and infrared images in existence.

This massive dataset requires thoughtful data management and distribution strategies. Minutes after changes in the night sky are detected, alerts will be sent out to enable followup. But the number of alerts — potentially as large as 10 million per night — would be overwhelming, so Rubin will partner with community brokers who will filter these alerts and send out a whittled-down number. The facility will also produce annual data releases, culminating in a 500-petabyte final release. As this is far too large to download onto a laptop, data users will interact with the data through a cloud-based science platform.

Beth Willman from the LSST Discovery Alliance expanded upon the data distribution policies of the observatory. Rubin data will be immediately available to anyone in the US and Chile, as well as scientists from participating institutions. The data will become available to all two years after collection. Willman highlighted the global nature of the endeavor, with 28 countries contributing to the physical construction of the observatory or the creation of its software. “It’s not your mother’s science,” Willman said, emphasizing that the massive amount of data that will be produced represents both a challenge and an opportunity to create a new paradigm in how science is done. Part of that new paradigm will be infrastructure that facilitates the participation of professional and citizen scientists across the globe. And the impact is likely to extend beyond astronomy, as the data management and discovery methods can be applied to other big-data fields.

Finally, Stephanie Deppe closed the session by introducing resources to learn more, including the Rubin media kit, images and videos, an opportunity to visit the observatory site this spring, and opportunities to receive an email digest or press releases.

Return to Table of Contents.


Press Conference: Galactic Histories and Policy Futures (by Archana Aravindan) (Briefing video)

A Dwarf Galaxy’s Stellar Halo Built by Accretion
Catherine Fielder (University of Arizona)

This study by Dr. Fielder and team offers a rare glimpse into the evolution of a small dwarf galaxy, NGC 300, and its role in building stellar halos. While massive galaxies grow through mergers, forming extensive stellar halos, dwarf galaxies have fewer opportunities for such assimilation. Using deep imaging from the DELVE survey, resolved star maps reveal intricate structures around NGC 300, including a northern stream that extends over 100,000 light-years. The metallicity of these streams suggests they originated from a smaller galaxy that NGC 300 pulled apart, driving the formation of its stellar halo through accretion. This opens exciting opportunities for future exploration of how dwarf galaxies can form and evolve with Rubin and Euclid. | Press release

The Boundary of Galaxy Formation: Constraints from the Ancient Star Formation of the Isolated, Extremely Low-Mass Galaxy Leo P
Kristen McQuinn (Space Telescope Science Institute and Rutgers University)

Satellite galaxies typically follow a pattern of initial bursty star formation that is later followed by a period of star-formation quenching close to the epoch of reionization. However, Dr. McQuinn and collaborators find that one particular low-mass galaxy, Leo P, underwent a slightly different process. This isolated galaxy experienced three distinct phases of evolution: early star formation, a pause post-reionization, and a later reignition of star formation. Unlike satellite galaxies near massive systems, where environmental effects such as tidal stripping may entangle with reionization, Leo P’s isolation could provide crucial insights into the role of reionization in halting star formation. Similar patterns are also observed in other low-mass galaxies. Dr. McQuinn’s findings suggest that reionization may suppress star formation in galaxies larger than ultra-faint dwarfs, with varying effects based on environmental factors. If extended pauses in star formation are common, low-mass galaxies likely contributed minimally to reionization. | Press release

Resolving 90 Million Stars in the Southern Half of Andromeda
Zhuo Chen (University of Washington)

The Local Group of galaxies, particularly Messier 31 (the Andromeda Galaxy or M31), is an ideal laboratory for studying galaxy astrophysics. As the Milky Way’s closest large neighbor, M31 allows for detailed exploration, with the ability to resolve hundreds of millions of stars. The Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Southern Treasury (PHAST) survey, of which Dr. Chen is a part, has produced the largest and sharpest photomosaic of the southern disk of M31, spanning decades and composed of 600 overlapping Hubble snapshots. The central region hosts older stars, while the southern disk features prominent dust lanes and young star-forming regions like NGC 206, along with numerous young star clusters. Observations also include Messier 32, a satellite galaxy dominated by older stars. Detailed analysis reveals that M31’s star formation history spans four age groups: very young (3–200 Myr), young (30–500 Myr), intermediate (0.8–2 Gyr), and old (> 2 Gyr). Tracking the older stars reveals a typical disk galaxy lacking visible spiral structures. Conversely, younger populations highlight more defined spiral arm structures, with the youngest stars creating the most pronounced features. | Press release

Recent Space Policy Statements Regarding Our Dark and Quiet Skies
John Barentine (Dark Sky Consulting)

The COMPASSE (Committee for the Protection of Astronomy and the Space Environment) empowers the astronomy community to advocate for preserving dark and radio-quiet skies, which face growing threats from satellite constellations, solar power infrastructure in space, and commercial space advertising.

To address these challenges, the AAS has issued key statements:

  • Transparency in Spaceflight Activities: Space activities, including cislunar (space around the Moon) and interplanetary missions, should be conducted openly, with publicly reported trajectories.
  • Atmospheric Impacts: Satellite launches and reentries contribute to atmospheric pollution. Congress needs to fund research to study and minimize their environmental effects and ensure that companies that launch satellites take them into consideration.
  • Space Advertising: Obtrusive space advertising poses a significant threat to ground-based astronomy and should be prohibited. The US and AAS are leading efforts to prevent its proliferation.

COMPASSE has also endorsed the IAU resolution on protecting dark skies and engaged with the US State Departments to promote these goals. Through these actions, COMPASSE aims to safeguard the observational capabilities essential for advancing astronomical research.

Return to Table of Contents.


RAS Gold Medal Lecture: From the Cradle: Applying Basic Physics to Astrophysical Fundamental Questions, Gilles Chabrier (ENS-Lyon) (by Bill Smith)

In the spirit of collaboration between the United States and United Kingdom, it has become tradition for the winner of the Royal Astronomical Society (RAS) Gold Medal to present a lecture at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society, and the winner of the AAS’s Henry Norris Russell Lectureship to present at a meeting of the RAS. This year’s Gold Medal winner, Dr. Gilles Chabrier, presented on how ideas from statistical mechanics can inform our understanding of star formation and cosmology.

His goal for the first half of the lecture was to explain his theory for the stellar initial mass function, which is a probability density function that describes the initial masses of a stellar population. He began by reviewing random field theory and how it is based on two random fields, a velocity field and a density field, occupying a space. One can think of the giant gas clouds out of which stars form as a turbulent gas. That turbulent gas, however, also self-attracts under the force of gravity. Dr. Chabrier went on to show how these dual influences, turbulence and gravity, will result in overdensities collapsing into masses following a log-normal probability density function with two power-law tails.

After that, Dr. Chabrier focused on irreversible processes in cosmology. He explained how in our standard understanding of the universe’s expansion, the inhomogeneities in the universe are negligible in redshift, but that the question of homogeneity is coordinate dependent. He suggests the introduction of a local expansion rate to fulfill the need for a covariant calculation of the cosmological redshift. He then explains that large-scale structure can also be thought of as a result of this turbulence generating a random field in which overdensities develop due to the influence of gravity. For dark matter, which is collisionless, large-scale structure forms when dark matter particles begin crossing trajectories (called shell-crossing). This leads to turbulent flows with overdensities that collapse into what we know as dark matter halos. As Dr. Chabrier points out, though, this is an irreversible process, which produces entropy. This entropy production plays a crucial role in the expansion of the universe, and Dr. Chabrier concluded by arguing that the cosmological constant appears as a proxy to account for the entropy production of the expansion rate.

Return to Table of Contents.


Lancelot M. Berkeley − New York Community Trust Prize for Meritorious Work in Astronomy Lecture: Erik Tollerud (Space Telescope Science Institute), Clara Brasseur (University of St Andrews), and Kelle Cruz (CUNY Hunter College and American Museum of Natural History) (by Bill Smith)

Writing the line of code “import astropy” has become a rite of passage for nearly every astronomy researcher, and many people in the astronomy community have long noted the unrecognized and undervalued work that has gone into creating and maintaining software. This year, the AAS recognized this work by awarding the Lancelot M. Berkeley − New York Community Trust Prize for Meritorious Work in Astronomy to the entire Astropy collaboration “for their work developing and maintaining this code base, which provides underlying support for much of astronomy research as it is conducted today.”

Accepting the award on behalf of the entire collaboration were Dr. Erik Tollerud of the Space Telescope Science Institute, Clara Brasseur, a graduate student at University of St. Andrews, and Dr. Kelle Cruz of Hunter College. They began by playing an extensive list of all of the people who contributed to astropy on the big screen and thanking them for their contributions, then divided the talk into three parts that described the past, present, and future of Astropy.

Dr. Tollerud began by recounting Astropy’s origin story to a time in 2011 when he had to transform astrophysical coordinates and found himself struggling to navigate the many packages available. When reaching out to a mailing list about his idea for a more standard package, he was met with skepticism that it would be yet another package to navigate. He then explained how an initial group decided that this package would be developed differently. First, it would utilize Github (which was new at the time) for better collaboration, and adopt a “do-ocracy” philosophy, which Dr. Tollerud explains as “the work that gets done is the work someone will do.” He also credits the organizational structure of the early developers, saying “if you make the right structure, even cats can be herded.”

Dr. Cruz then described the current successes and challenges of the Astropy collaboration. She cites the original Astropy paper as being on track to be one of the most-cited astronomy papers ever as a resounding success. She also cites the thorough testing and stability of the core package as another success. She goes on to explain that the success of Astropy has presented new challenges. First, because Astropy is now such a critical piece of infrastructure for much of the astronomical community, including for most missions, testing and stability of the code are more critical than ever, requiring more resources and making it more challenging for people newer to software engineering to contribute. She then explained Astropy’s package structure, which includes core packages, coordinated packages, and affiliated packages.

Dr. Cruz also explained the governance structure of the collaboration, which included adopting a charter and policies for transparency. She also shared details about the Astropy collaboration’s increasing success in securing funding for the project. She thanked the many institutional contributors and highlighted contributions from the Flatiron Institute and NASA.

Clara Brasseur concluded the plenary by discussing the future of Astropy. They discussed how the core codebase is in a “maintenance phase,” but that maintenance for a software package like Astropy is still a lot of work, including bug reports, documentation, tutorials, and more. They highlighted a huge area for growth, Astropy Learn: a new website that hosts tutorials, mainly in the form of Jupyter notebooks, on many of the astropy modules. Clara concluded with a call to the audience to get involved and noting the possibilities that contributing can bring, saying “I’m a graduate student, and I’m up here giving a plenary talk! We have a place for any type of contribution.”

Return to Table of Contents.

1 2 3 22