AAS News RSS

Cassiopeia A

Editor’s Note: This week we’re at the 245th AAS meeting in National Harbor, MD, and online. Along with a team of authors from Astrobites, we will be writing updates on selected events at the meeting and posting each day. Follow along here or at astrobites.com for daily summaries, or follow @astrobites.bsky.social on Bluesky for more coverage. The usual posting schedule for AAS Nova will resume on January 21st.

Table of Contents:


Bronze Award for the University of Michigan from the Physics and Astronomy SEA Change Committee (by Jessie Thwaites)

At the beginning of the morning’s sessions, Dr. Dara Norman (AAS President) announced that the University of Michigan Department of Astronomy has earned a Bronze Award from the Physics and Astronomy SEA Change Committee (read the AAS press release here). The award recognizes the University of Michigan Astronomy Department’s work towards understanding obstacles to diversity, equity, and inclusion in their community, in order to engage all members of their community. They have developed a five-year plan to address any issues identified in their assessment. The University of Michigan Astronomy Department is the first astronomy department to receive this award.

Return to Table of Contents.


From the Smallest Things to the Greatest Results — The Incredible Power of the Chandra X-ray Observatory, Dave Pooley (Trinity University and Eureka Scientific, Inc.) (by Jessie Thwaites)

X-ray vision has long been considered a superpower — and the Chandra X-ray Observatory has that power! Dr. Pooley begins his talk by saying that summarizing the successes of X-ray astronomy, or even just those enabled by Chandra, is impossible in a mere 40 minutes. So, he set some of the Chandra greatest discovery images to one of his favorite great hits: Kermit the Frog’s Rainbow Connection. From intricate maps of our solar system, images of merging galaxies, and microlensed galaxies, to understanding of cosmic structures, Chandra has enabled incredible discovery over the past 25 years since launch.

But making these images, Dr. Pooley says, is more than detecting — it was designing and focusing an incredible instrument, and in particular, incredibly smooth mirrors. X-rays have to be focused at grazing incidence, otherwise they will pass right through the mirror, and any imperfection on the surface degrades our ability to focus the instrument. So at the time of  Chandra design and development, the team designed the smoothest mirrors ever produced. If the mirrors were the size of Earth, Dr. Pooley says, the largest imperfections would be a mountain only a meter tall! This incredible feat of engineering has enabled the incredibly precise images that drive the cutting edge science done with Chandra.

Dr. Pooley goes on to highlight some of the amazing science done with Chandra. With its exemplary resolution, Chandra is able to resolve 100 times more sources in the globular cluster 47 Tucanae than its predecessor, ROSAT, and where ROSAT could not detect any sources in Messier 4, Chandra can detect around 100 of them. These new images allow the team to study the dynamics of the cluster and how binaries are forming inside them.

Chandra has also unlocked our current understanding of how particles are accelerated in supernovae, by resolving their gas structure. In a supernova, a forward-moving shock is propelled by the explosion into the gas surrounding the star, and a reverse shock pushes particles back toward the supernova. Electrons accelerated by the forward shock produce synchrotron radiation that has been imaged by Chandra, providing key evidence to describe how cosmic particles are accelerated in supernovae. It was also the first observatory to detect X-rays from the merger of two neutron stars in the multimessenger discovery of GW170817, showcasing its power as a time domain and multimessenger astronomy instrument.

The science that can be done with Chandra is not just monumental, it’s transformative. Imaging galaxy clusters with Chandra has also furthered our understanding of dark matter. Through Chandra imaging of the Bullet Cluster, which is unique in that it is actually the product of two colliding galaxy clusters, scientists can find proof of the existence of dark matter. While normal matter is subject to drag forces, dark matter is not, so the normal matter that emits in X-rays observed by Chandra is concentrated towards the center, while most of the mass of the cluster is concentrated farther away, as shown in the figure below.

Bullet Cluster

Image of the Bullet cluster by Hubble and Magellan telescopes, with a map of the normal matter (seen by Chandra, pink) and dark matter (blue) shown on top. [X-ray: NASA/CXC/CfA/M.Markevitch, Optical and lensing map: NASA/STScI, Magellan/U.Arizona/D.Clowe, Lensing map: ESO WFI]

Dr. Pooley also highlights the dedication of Chandra scientists to making their science accessible to all. With excellent software and documentation for newcomers, they have worked to make their science accessible. In the future, spacecraft like AXIS and eventually Lynx will hopefully come online to extend the success of Chandra even further. When it was announced that Chandra might lose funding, the astronomy community came together in the movement to #SaveChandra (also covered in this Astrobite). Continued advocacy is needed to keep our high energy eye on the sky funded and operating. As Dr. Pooley says, Chandra is still working beautifully and making breakthrough scientific discoveries today. It’s essential to keep this magnificent spacecraft operating so that we can continue to make amazing discoveries.

Return to Table of Contents.


Press Conference: Black Holes & New Outcomes from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (by Lexi Gault) (Briefing video)

A Variable X-Ray Monster at the Epoch of Reionization (Press Release)
Lea Marcotulli (Yale University)

At the center of most galaxies in the universe lies a supermassive black hole. When these black holes are gobbling up galactic material, they become some of the brightest objects in our universe. Dr. Marcotulli announced X-ray observations taken with Chandra and NuSTAR of one such object, J1429+5447, which lies in the epoch of reionization — just 900 million years after the Big Bang. J1429+5447 is the brightest active supermassive black hole observed in X-rays at this distance and is the farthest source ever detected by NuSTAR. These observations reveal extreme X-ray variability, which is indicative of powerful relativistic jets coming from J1429+5447. This discovery provides the opportunity to study the relationship between supermassive black hole growth and jet-powering mechanisms.

JWST’s Little Red Dots and the Rise of Obscured Active Galactic Nuclei in the Early Universe (Press Release)
Dale Kocevski (Colby College)

Recently discovered with JWST, little red dots are red compact objects with unusual colors that have evoked many questions from astronomers. If these objects are galaxies powered by stellar light, they introduce the “over-massive galaxy problem” — these galaxies would be much too massive much too soon after the Big Bang given current cosmological theories and galaxy formation models. A new study, led by Dr. Kocevski, compiled a sample of 341 little red dots to further investigate these perplexing objects. They find that these objects exist primarily between redshifts of z~4 to z~8 and are more numerous than the expected number of quasars and X-ray active galactic nuclei in this range. Spectroscopy of these little red dots reveals broad emission lines, a sign of a fast-moving accretion disk orbiting an active supermassive black hole. Though these galaxies are primarily powered by supermassive black holes — solving the over-massive galaxy problem — further studies of these sources will help to understand how their central black holes formed and how the galaxy catches up to its black hole.

Revealing the Mid-Infrared Properties of the Milky Way’s Supermassive Black Hole (Press Release)
Joseph Michail (Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian)

Using JWST, Dr. Michail and collaborators have detected the first-ever mid-infrared flare from our galaxy’s central supermassive black hole Sagittarius (Sgr) A*. Over the past 30+ years, researchers have observed flares in Sgr A* at other wavelengths, but until this study, have yet to observe a flare in the mid-infrared. This new detection fills the gap between near-infrared and radio observations of flares in Sgr A* and provides a new view in understanding the microphysics responsible for the formation of flares.

Black Hole Archaeology: Mapping the Growth History of Black Holes Across Cosmic Time (Press Release)
Logan Fries (University of Connecticut)

With the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Reverberation Mapping project making mass measurements of hundreds of black holes, Fries and collaborators have been able to use these masses in conjunction with spectroscopic observations to measure the spin of a sample of black holes. The spin of a black hole is important as it encodes the growth history of the black hole. If a black hole builds its mass through accreting material, the black hole will spin up rapidly, and if a black hole builds its mass through mergers, the black hole will spin down. Through this study, they find that many black holes spin up quickly, and that black holes in more distant galaxies tend to spin up more than those in the nearby universe. This challenges the expectation that most black holes gain mass through mergers, and future observations with JWST will help to further understand how black holes have grown over time.

The SDSS-V Local Volume Mapper: Early Data and Science (Press Release)
Dhanesh Krishnarao (Colorado College)

SDSS has employed a set of four robotic telescopes to map the Milky Way’s interstellar medium to further understand how star formation occurs. Dr. Krishnarao presented the first data and science from the SDSS-V Local Volume Mapper (LVM), a survey aimed at taking spectra covering various emission lines for a large section of the Milky Way. These observations will allow scientists to observe individual stars’ impacts on the surrounding gas, which are key to understanding how galaxies form stars and evolve. Another important aspect of SDSS-V is its Faculty and Student Team (FAST) program, which provides support for students and faculty from minority-serving institutions to join the collaboration. The first data from LVM will be publicly available in data release 19 from SDSS.

Return to Table of Contents.


Henry Norris Russell Lectureship: The Cosmic Triangle: Probing the Dark Side of the Universe, Neta A. Bahcall (Princeton University) (by Archana Aravindan)

For Dr. Neta Bahcall, the Henry Norris Russell Lectureship holds a special significance. Dr. Henry Russell played a significant role in establishing Princeton, where Dr. Bahcall has spent nearly 50 years, as a leading center for theoretical astronomy! Additionally, her husband Dr. John Bahcall was also awarded the lectureship in 1999, making them the first couple to win the award!

Dr. Neta Bahcall receives the Henry Norris Russell lectureship from Dr. Dara Norman, President, AAS.

Dr. Bahcall begins her talk by providing a brief history about how the concept of dark matter came about. In the 1970s, the accepted fraction of matter (Ωm) in the universe was believed to be 1, indicating that all the matter in the universe was accounted for. But several eminent astronomers, including Fritz Zwicky, did not think that was true. The concept of dark matter (or matter we cannot see) was already floating around, but few people believed in it. Dr. Bahcall and her collaborators set out to observationally determine the value of Ωm, helping us understand if there truly is mass that we cannot see! They did this in two ways:

  1. Cluster correlation function: This function indicates how clusters of galaxies are distributed in space. Dr. Bahcall found that this function was 20 times stronger than the galaxy correlation function (which indicates how galaxies are distributed in space!). This discrepancy indicates that we see a large-scale structure in the universe and implies that the distribution of all the mass is not just tracing the light. There must be some mass that is not accounted for and thus Ωm cannot be 1. Dr. Bahcall and her collaborators determined that the fraction of baryonic matter (matter that interacts with light) should instead be closer to 0.3, and there must be some other form of matter that is not tracing the light. This discovery swung open the door for several models of dark matter.
  2. Mass-to-light ratios: Additionally, Dr. Bahcall also made use of another method to confirm this new value of Ωm. She calculated the total mass present in a given region of space based on its observed luminosity, essentially providing an indication of how much matter exists relative to the amount of light we can detect. This ratio is called the mass-to-light ratio or M/L. Higher M/L ratios suggest that all the matter is just not contained in stars (which contribute to the luminosity) and a larger proportion of dark matter is present.

This led Dr. Bahcall to set up a figure known as the cosmic triangle, which is a way of representing the past, present, and future status of the universe. The most precise measurements of the three quantities confine the universe to a strip in the plot. The three strips overlap at the ΛCDM model, which is in best agreement with observations.

Dr. Bahcall also touches upon the recent state of the field and all the ongoing questions about where the dark matter is actually located. New results from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey indicate that the M/L ratio increases up to a certain limit and it flattens out as we eventually go to larger and larger scales. This shows that most of the mass in groups comes from dark matter in galaxy halos, and there is no need for any additional dark matter that fills the space between large clusters.

Throughout her lectureship, Dr. Bahcall stresses the beauty of doing science. “It’s about how we don’t understand where we are and go step by step to figure it out!” she says. She wraps up her talk by thanking her mentors, collaborators, and grad students, and by giving a moving tribute to her wonderful family and (late) husband.

Return to Table of Contents.


Press Conference: New Information from Milky Way Highlights (by Lexi Gault) (Briefing video)

Infrared Echoes of Cassiopeia A Reveal the Dynamic Interstellar Medium (Press Release)
Jacob Jencson (California Institute of Technology/IPAC)

Cassiopeia A light echoes

JWST’s near-infrared view of Cassiopeia A’s light echoes. Click to enlarge. [NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Jacob Jencson (Caltech/IPAC)]

Cassiopeia A is the youngest core-collapse supernova in the galaxy whose light has propagated through the Milky Way, creating infrared echoes that light up interstellar clouds of cold gas and dust. Dr. Jencson presented new JWST images that show the most detailed pictures of these echoes that have ever been taken. As the echoes propagate, the 3D geometry of the interstellar gas and dust is revealed based on how long it has taken the light from these echoes to reach Earth. These images reveal surprising sheet-like structures on solar system–sized scales, opening up new avenues to study the formation of structure in interstellar clouds.

A Path-Breaking Observation of the Cold Neutral Medium of the Milky Way Through Thermal Light Echoes (Press Release)
Joshua Peek (Space Telescope Science Institute)

The detailed JWST observations of the light echoes surrounding Cassiopeia A illuminate a prototypical piece of the interstellar medium, which has allowed Dr. Peek and collaborators to explore the properties of the cold neutral medium that makes up 40% of the gas in the Milky Way. From the images, the structure of the cold neutral medium appears to have bundles of longer filaments and knots, which are similar to structures seen in simulations of magnetized gas. Magnetized gas resists compression, but stars form out of cooling and compressing gas, so further studying these small structures in the cold neutral medium will aid in understanding how gas collapses to form stars.

three views of the Ring Nebula

Left: Hubble Space Telescope image of the Ring Nebula. Center: Radio emission from carbon monoxide molecules as seen by the Submillimeter Array. Right: Infrared image of JWST showing contours of the carbon monoxide molecules that are moving perpendicular to our line of sight. Click to enlarge. [NASA/ESA/O’Dell/Ferland/Henney/Peimbert/Thompson; SMA image and SMA/JWST image overlay: Joel Kastner/RIT]

Imaging an Astronomical Icon in 3D: A New View of the Ring Nebula (Press Release)
Joel Kastner (RIT Center for Imaging Science)

The Ring Nebula is an iconic astronomical object, and despite its frequent stage time, the intrinsic 3D structure of the ring has yet to be fully understood until now. Dr. Kastner presented Submillimeter Array imaging of the Ring Nebula from which a 3D model of the nebula was created. The gas in the nebula appears in a clumpy ellipsoidal shell with holes on both sides, roughly the shape of a barrel. These holes are likely driven by a binary companion that created strong, high velocity outflows through the center of the shell. From this model, they find that the gas was ejected from the central star around 6,000 years ago. Uncovering the 3D structure of planetary nebulae, like the Ring Nebula, allows scientists to better understand the ending stages of intermediate-mass stars.

X-Ray Echoes from Sgr A* Provide Insight on the 3D Structure of Molecular Clouds in the Galactic Center (Press Release)
Danya Alboslani (University of Connecticut)

Similar to infrared echoes from Cassiopeia A, X-ray echoes from the Milky Way’s central black hole Sagittarius A* reveal the 3D structure of molecular clouds near the galactic center. Alboslani presented two decades of X-ray echo observations from the Chandra X-ray Observatory and the resulting 3D maps of two molecular clouds, the Stone and Sticks clouds, in the Milky Way’s central molecular zone. These clouds exist in an extreme environment with temperatures and densities much higher than elsewhere in the galaxy. Through comparing the X-ray observations to submillimeter wavelength observations of the same clouds, the duration of the X-ray flare can be constrained based on the gaps in structure shown in the X-ray imaging. They find the flare to be no longer than ~5 months. These 3D maps provide further insight into the conditions that lead to star formation in the central region of the galaxy.

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: A Detector Backstory: How Silicon Detectors Came to Enable Space Missions, Shouleh Nikzad (Jet Propulsion Laboratory) (by Bill Smith)

Dr. Shouleh Nikzad began by expressing her belief that the development of any new technology goes through three phases: invention, innovation, and infusion. In her plenary talk, she discussed these three phases as they applied to the development of silicon detectors for the ultraviolet (UV) light spectrum. She began with an overview of why the UV part of the spectrum is critical for astronomy, noting the many electron transitions that can be seen in ultraviolet spectra and applications for understanding planetary atmospheres. However, detecting the UV spectrum presents unique challenges, notably that UV radiation is absorbed within a few nanometers of the surface it hits, which means the designers of UV detectors must have exquisite control over the surfaces they develop.

Dr. Nikzad then shared a few of the reasons why silicon specifically was used to develop UV detectors, including the widespread adoption of silicon technology in industry. This widespread adoption meant that the existing infrastructure for the technology already existed and that it could be scalable for the next generation of flagship telescopes.

To create these silicon detectors, Dr. Nikzad and her group use a technique called atomic layer deposition, which is a technique that can create a very thin film on a surface with a high degree of control over the thickness. By using this technique, they were able to develop silicon detectors that, for the first time, could count single photons in the UV spectrum. She then explained how they were able to develop a bandpass filter for these detectors that would enhance UV detection and reject visible light.

Dr. Nikzad concluded by providing a tour of missions and potential future missions using this technology, including the Zwicky Transient Facility, FIREBall-2 (The Faint Intergalactic Medium Redshifted Emission Balloon Telescope, SPARCS (the Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat), and UVEX (the Ultraviolet Explorer).

Return to Table of Contents.


Annie Jump Cannon Prize Lecture: The Icy Origins of Planetary Systems, Jenny Bergner (University of California, Berkeley) (by Lindsey Gordon)

Dr. Jenny Bergner received the 2024 Annie Jump Cannon Award, which is “for outstanding research and promise for future research by a postdoctoral woman researcher.” The award citation is for “…her innovative astrochemical work at the intersection of laboratory experiments, theory, and observations, which has established new pathways to interstellar chemical complexity.”

Dr. Bergner’s work focuses on the chemistry of stars and planets during their formation. Baby stars are surrounded by protoplanetary disks, which are flattened disks of material that have a high enough density to clump together into planetesimals. Planetesimals are solids that are too small to be planets but are large enough to be held together by gravity.

These disks are a window into the chemical building blocks of planets. Three categories of material make them up: dust, ice, and gas. But these materials aren’t like their Earth analogs. Dust is composed of refractory materials: materials that remain solid at high temperatures. Ice is the layer of frozen volatiles — materials that vaporize at high temperatures —that stick to the dust. The ice isn’t all water, and it doesn’t have the crystalline structure that Earth ice does, but rather an “amorphous fluffy structure” with lots of nooks and crannies. The gas is any molecule not frozen out into the ice, and the gas is at the very low temperature of ~10K [−441.67℉ / −263.15℃].

There are lots of questions about these materials that are only now able to be answered. How much of each material is present and the chemical breakdown of each material will affect the kinds, properties, and atmospheres of the resulting planets. Whether or not the planets that form will be hospitable to life is an even harder question that depends on the presence of biogenic elements (C, H, O, N, S, P), which are the building blocks for life on Earth.

The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) has allowed astrochemists to measure the substructure of the composition of protoplanetary disks. The ALMA-MAPS program looked at the millimeter-size dust grains’ emissions for different molecular line data. However, ALMA is only good at looking at gas and dust, but not ice. Most volatiles are in the ice, which meant we weren’t able to constrain their properties until JWST came along.

JWST is able to observe edge-on protoplanetary disks, which allows us to measure the central star’s light as it passes through the disk. This allows us to determine the disk composition including the ice. In an early JWST observing program of the HH 48 NE disk, they found evidence for H2O, CO2, and CO, but they needed to produce spectra in the lab for comparison.

Because space ice is so different from Earth ice, Dr. Bergner’s group uses a highly specialized cryogenically cooled vacuum chamber to form analogs of space ice for study. They take spectra of samples to try and match the JWST observations. They also do full radiative transfer modeling of how the photons moved through the disk in order to properly reproduce the observations.

From this work, they were able to differentiate between possible scenarios, and found that there are different regions in the disk where H2O, CO, and CO2 all interact (“polar” regions) and regions where only CO and CO2 interact (“apolar”). They were also able to measure the C/O ratios in the icy solids and found lower values than expected based on previous protostellar ice inventories. This is only one system, of course, but this is exciting for future work. JWST has already observed or is scheduled to observe 12 edge-on disks that will allow the team to explore disks as a population.

Dr. Bergner also highlighted the need for far-infrared observations. Water’s emission line, cool-warm gas phase water lines, and gas tracing for the total disk mass are only possible with far-infrared spectra. The proposed PRobe Far-Infrared Mission for Astrophysics (PRIMA) mission is still conceptual, but if approved, it would fill in this gap.

The JWST spectra also show the presence of more complex molecules, the formation and fate of which was not known. Her group investigated excited-state oxygen atom chemistry, where ionized oxygen can react with hydrocarbons to form organic molecules. This reaction has no activation barrier, but it might not be stable. In a lab setting, Dr. Bergner’s team found that this process can make complex molecules at 10K, and that this process is broadly applicable to form many different molecules.

She then focused on what happens to these molecules once they’re formed. Making a planet is violent, and we don’t expect complex molecules to survive the formation process. It seems likely that complex molecules are delivered later through impacts by icy planetesimals. This is backed up by looking at planetesimals in our own solar system — like comets and asteroids — which also have chemical complexity that dates back to the solar system’s formation. Her group modeled the survival of ice in disks, and found that comets may form further out in the disk before drifting inward to smaller radii, which protects the ice.

2017’s visit from Oumuamua was the first time we had the opportunity to study a planetesimal from another system. It also had a big mystery — it was moving faster than we would expect under purely gravitational conditions. But it wasn’t aliens — it was likely due to outgassing (ejection) of material giving it a boost, similar to what comets are known to do. What gas it was releasing was hard to pin down. There was no evidence for carbon-based gases, and the amount of solar energy it received wasn’t enough to cause it to release water or CO2. This left a small list of possible materials.

Dr. Bergner studied hydrogen as an option. The theory was that Oumuamua was a comet coming towards us, and radiation hitting water molecules created molecular hydrogen that got trapped in the nooks and crannies of the amorphous ice. When our Sun heated the remaining water ice, it crystallized into a lattice structure and the hydrogen escaped and boosted Oumuamua’s velocity. This turns out to be a viable option for the gravitational boost, as there is a large parameter space where it would work and the amount of solar energy it received is enough to have made the ice into a lattice.

Dr. Bergner’s work sits at the intersection of observations, experiments, and theory. The field of protoplanetary disks and planetary system formation has a bright future with JWST and potentially the far-infrared PRIMA mission.

Return to Table of Contents.

Westerlund 1

Editor’s Note: This week we’re at the 245th AAS meeting in National Harbor, MD, and online. Along with a team of authors from Astrobites, we will be writing updates on selected events at the meeting and posting each day. Follow along here or at astrobites.com for daily summaries, or follow @astrobites.bsky.social on Bluesky for more coverage. The usual posting schedule for AAS Nova will resume on January 21st.

Table of Contents:


Workshop: Strategies for Mentoring Undergraduate Researchers (by Lindsey Gordon)

This workshop came out of the Council for Undergraduate Research and Dr. Carol Hood’s work at Cal State Bernardino on programs like CalBridge. It’ll be offered again at future conferences including the American Physical Society conference. The workshop was split into two parts. In the first, small groups discussed mentoring strategies based on experiences. What makes a good mentor? What makes a bad mentor? The important takeaway was student-centered / student-driven mentoring. In the second half, the development of individual development plans was discussed, using real student examples. These plans work backwards from a goal to create a roadmap for the student’s research, and they are broadly applicable to mentorship beyond research.

Return to Table of Contents.


Welcome Address by AAS President, Dara Norman (NSF NOIRLab) (by Lindsey Gordon)

This year marks the 125th anniversary of AAS, and 50th AAS President Dara Norman gave opening remarks on Monday morning. She honored our colleagues who have lost their homes in the LA fires and couldn’t attend this year. (This article from the LA Times lists ways to help those affected by the fires, and the Federal Trade Commission provides guidance on how to donate safely and avoid scams.) Dr. Norman emphasized the importance of the AAS working groups, who are dealing with the rise in AI, the overwhelming numbers of applicants to astronomy graduate programs, and our carbon footprint. The 2027 summer meeting will be held fully virtually in response to members’ concerns about climate change, equity and access, and the health of our members. “This will not be your grandma’s virtual meeting,” Dr. Norman quipped. The meeting overlaps with the International Astronomical Union general assembly, which the virtual format allows flexibility for. She concluded by emphasizing the diversity of our community and the need to retain that diversity and to maintain our community.

Return to Table of Contents.


Fred Kavli Prize Plenary Lecture: The Terrestrial Worlds of Low-Mass Stars, Dave Charbonneau (Harvard University) (by Lindsey Gordon)

David Charbonneau is a pioneer in observations of transiting exoplanets, and in the new plenary format of taking the Q&A session two-thirds of the way through your talk when the slides fail. He and Prof. Sara Seager (MIT) won the 2024 Kavli Prize for their work on exoplanets and their atmospheres.

His work focuses on terrestrial planets: how they form their atmospheres, how those atmospheres depend on the planet and the host star, how they might lose their atmospheres, and how we might be able to detect the atmosphere and its chemical contents.

So how do we study planetary atmospheres? It turns out we can only study systems within 15 parsecs of us with stars that are ~30% the radius of the Sun. JWST and the Extremely Large Telescope are expected to be able to detect molecules in the atmospheres of planets in that range. Dr. Charbonneau described his work on the M spectral class, which covers a huge range of stellar sizes. The M-dwarf stars he cares about for this work are the ones that fall into that 30% solar radius category. However, stars at these masses are fully convective with no radiative zone. This has huge implications for the star’s magnetic and emission activity and long-term angular momentum evolution.

There are 413 stars that fit into their observing parameters. For these stars his group studied:

1. The rate of occurrence of terrestrial worlds using the transit method, of which they find 7 in that group. They then studied the sensitivity rate — did we find all the planets that are there? — by injecting fake observations for different planetary sizes and periods. From this they were able to infer the intrinsic rate of occurrence of terrestrial planets. They didn’t see large terrestrial planets or small planets that we would’ve expected to find if they were there. This led them to conclude that there is a high occurrence rate — at least one rocky planet per two low-mass M dwarfs — and the distribution of those planets’ radii peaks at 1 Earth radius.

2. The rate of occurrence of gas giant (Jupiter-like) planets using the radial velocity method. One-third of the stars in the population had no spectra, so they set out to complete the sample. The presence of Jupiter in our solar system was highly influential to the properties of our terrestrial planets; systems without such a planet may have evolved very differently. They found that essentially none (<1.5%) of the low-mass stars had a Jupiter analog, and therefore the terrestrial planets in those systems may be very different than in ours.

At this point, the presentation equipment failed. He took questions at this time, during which he told us about his favorite planet, which is a cold, rocky planet in the habitable zone around a calm star that is a great opportunity for determining if rocky planets can retain their atmospheres.

3. Characterizing the stellar magnetic activity and other properties. They found two populations of very fast and very slowly rotating stars, suggesting a rapid transition between those states. They found the flare rate of the rapid rotators is much higher than slow rotators, which could have serious implications for the survival of an atmosphere. The stellar spindown is also very mass-dependent, with larger stars spinning down faster.

Return to Table of Contents.


Congressman Glenn Ivey Visit (by Lindsey Gordon)

“Goddard in the house!” Congressman Glenn Ivey has represented Maryland’s 4th congressional district — which includes Goddard Space Flight Center — since 2023. He paid a visit to the exhibit hall floor on Monday morning, where he emphasized the importance of work in the sciences, particularly in the role of climate change in the recent wildfires in CA. He’s working to keep science, NASA, and Goddard moving in the right direction in what is a very exciting time in our industry.

Return to Table of Contents.


Press Conference: A Feast of Feasting Black Holes (by Lindsey Gordon) (Briefing video)

Witnessing the Birth of a New Plasma Jet from a Supermassive Black Hole
Eileen Meyer (University of Maryland, Baltimore County)

Dr. Meyer discussed 1ES 1927+654, a nearby “changing look” active galactic nucleus (AGN) that brightened by 100x in 2018 over the course of a few months. This is a rare event, and the system has been monitored closely across a range of wavelengths ever since. In 2022 the X-ray emission picked up, and then the radio peaked as well, 60x brighter at the peak. The radio peak suggests that AGN jets were turned on, which had never been observed before, and challenged beliefs about the on/off timescales for jets. Very Long Baseline Array observations saw the emergence of jets going 33% the speed of light. This might be the birth of a compact symmetric object, due to the initial brightness peaking resembling a tidal disruption event. | Press release

Rapidly Evolving X-Ray Oscillations in the Active Galaxy 1ES 1927+654
Megan Masterson (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Masterson (an Astrobiter!) discussed the same source as Dr. Meyer and highlighted its X-ray variability. The Neutron star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER) and XMM-Newton observations show a short-term periodicity around the supermassive black hole, which is rare to observe. The period has declined from 18 to 7 minutes over the past ~2 years and is stabilizing around 7 minutes. This could be due to either oscillations of the new jets, or due to an orbiting white dwarf very close to the black hole. The system is observable by the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), which could confirm the white dwarf if it is one. | Press release

Uncovering the Dining Habits of Supermassive Black Holes in Our Cosmic Backyard with NuLANDS
Peter Boorman (California Institute of Technology)

Dr. Boorman discussed the work of the NuLANDS project, which used infrared observations to find a population of both obscured and unobscured AGN. The obscuration comes from the donut-shaped accretion disk of material being “eaten” by the black hole. Different levels of obscuration occur depending on the orientation of the donut relative to the observer. AGN are infrared bright regardless of orientation, allowing a complete sample to be found and then categorized. They found a very balanced population of ~35% heavily obscured, ~37% obscured, and ~28% unobscured AGN, which makes a great sample for future studies. | Press release

The Discovery of a Newborn Quasar Jet Triggered by a Cosmic Dance
Olivia Achenbach (United States Naval Academy) 

We’ve been navigating by the stars for millennia now, but modern methods also use radio signals for calibration. Radio systems that switch from an “off” state to an “on” state could affect these methods. Achenbach studied a system of a recently turned-on radio-bright AGN to study trigger mechanisms for new jet formation. She found a system with evidence of previous jet activity that had been recently reignited by galaxy–galaxy interactions with a tidal tail connecting the two. | Press release

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: Galaxy Evolution Eras Tour: The Formative Years of Star Formation and Supermassive Black Hole Growth, Alexandra Pope (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (by Archana Aravindan)

The AAS 245 is just another stop in Dr. Pope’s Galaxy Evolution Eras Tour! Galaxies, just like Taylor Swift, go through different eras. In this plenary talk, Dr. Pope, Professor of Astronomy at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and the chair of the Five College Astronomy Department, focuses on the formative years of galaxy growth. This period is commonly known as cosmic noon, occurring between 10 and 11 billion years ago. During this time, galaxies formed stars at a rapid rate and black holes in galaxies grew quickly.

There appears to be some correlation between the rapidly growing supermassive black holes (active galactic nuclei (AGN)) and the star formation in galaxies. This manifests itself in several scaling relations that are observed between the mass of the black hole and the mass of stars in the galaxy in which it resides. However, we still do not know how exactly the two processes correlate with each other. Dust plays an important role in our (limited) understanding of the correlations between black holes and star formation in galaxies at cosmic noon. The majority of cosmic star formation is hidden behind the dust, with observations indicating that 50–75% of AGN are in obscured dust-filled galaxies. Luckily, with JWST, we can finally pierce through the dust and look at dusty galaxies to understand the correlations!

It’s me, hi, I’m the problem!

The biggest problem (other than dust!) in understanding the correlation between star formation and black hole growth is that measurements of the black hole accretion rates and star formation rates are often not taken from the same sample of galaxies. Using the MIRI instrument on JWST, Dr. Pope and her collaborators simultaneously study the black hole accretion rate and star formation rate in the same sample of dusty galaxies at cosmic noon. AGN and star formation activity have unique spectral signatures that can be disentangled from one another, allowing measurements of both the black hole accretion rate and star formation rate in the same galaxy. Their ultimate goal is to track the galaxies as they land on the scaling relations between the mass of the black hole and the mass of the stars.

End Game?

JWST covers the mid-infrared part of the electromagnetic spectrum, and the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array helps us understand the submillimeter wavelengths in these cosmic noon galaxies. However, the far-infrared wavelengths are not well observed and are likely holding a wealth of information about the interplay of AGN and star formation activity.  Enter the Probe far-Infrared Mission for Astrophysics (PRIMA), which is one of the two missions selected for a concept study by NASA. This far-infrared observatory will be able to measure scaling relations, redshifts, black hole accretion rates and star formation rates for nearly 60,000 galaxies. After a detailed evaluation, NASA will select one concept in 2026 to proceed with construction, for a launch in 2032. With PRIMA, Dr. Pope is hopeful that we might finally understand how black holes and stars in a galaxy co-evolve!

Return to Table of Contents.


Press Conference: Supernovae and Massive Stars (by Jessie Thwaites) (Briefing video)

JWST Discovery of a Distant Supernova Linked to a Massive Progenitor in the Early Universe
Dave Coulter (Space Telescope Science Institute)

Supernovae are responsible for a huge variety of astrophysical phenomena, including star formation and heavy element production. At the beginning of our universe (right after the Big Bang), the first stars began to form. These stars were “considerably different than stars today,” and their supernovae featured “gargantuan explosions,” says Dr. Coulter. Using the JADES transient survey with JWST, some of the earliest supernovae can be studied, including the case of AT 2023adsv which is at redshift 3.61when the universe was less than 2 billion years old. This study marks a major first step towards finding the earliest supernovae and studying the evolution of some of the earliest stars. | Press release (PDF)

Core-Collapse Supernovae as Key Dust Producers: New Insights from JWST
Melissa Shahbandeh (Space Telescope Science Institute)

Dust is incredibly important in astronomy; it provides the building blocks for stars and planets that eventually create our universe as we know it today. Massive dust reservoirs have recently been detected in high-redshift galaxies, leading astronomers to re-think how dust is formed in these systems. Dr. Shahbandeh describes how core-collapse supernovae, specifically Type IIN supernovae, could be the answer. By studying supernova 2005ip with Spitzer and JWST, they can study the life cycle of dust, from the supernova that spreads material throughout the system, to the new star that forms, to the formation of solar systems and planets (and maybe life!), to the cycle’s repeat when the new star goes supernova. Dr. Shahbandeh finds that supernovae are rapid dust factories, and continue to create dust, even years after explosion! | Press release (PDF)

JWST Tracks the Expanding Dusty Fingerprints of a Massive Binary
Emma Lieb (University of Denver)

Lieb discusses an interesting binary system, known as WR140, which is enriching its local environment with dust. It consists of a massive, evolved star with strong stellar winds (called a Wolf-Rayet star) and an O-star companion. They are in a highly eccentric orbit around each other, and when they pass at their nearest point (called periastron), their stellar winds collide and produce dust, “kind of like a big belch.” By taking two images of this system nearly a year apart with JWST, Lieb can study the expanding shells of dust produced by these near passes. They find that the shells are moving at nearly 1% of the speed of light, and are non-uniform, which provides clues to the dust’s formation. | Press release

Stellar Pyrotechnics on Display in Super Star Cluster
Kristina Monsch (Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian)

The super star clusters (SSC) are being studied by EWOCS! Not the cute fluffy characters from Star Wars, but by the EWOCS Project, which is an international team studying the star formation processes in the Westerlund 1 and 2 clusters. These clusters consist of young, massive stars (more than 100 times the mass of our Sun), and are able to ionize their surroundings. Westerlund 1 (Wd1) is nearby (4.2 kpc away), and includes massive stars at many different phases of stellar evolution. By observing this cluster in the near- and mid-infrared with JWST’s NIRCam and MIRI instruments, Dr. Monsch can pierce through the dust in these clusters to observe the stars near the center of the cluster. They can study the powerful winds from these massive stars to gain insight into how these stars form, impact their environment, and die. | Press release

A Blue Lurker Emerges from a Triple-System Merger
Emily Leiner (Illinois Institute of Technology)

While studying the cluster Messier 67, Dr. Leiner noticed something strange. Most stars in this cluster are the same age and have similar rotations, but there are a few peculiar “blue lurker” stars that rotate suspiciously fast for their age. Hubble observations of one of these stars revealed a white dwarf with a larger mass than expected for the cluster’s population orbiting the blue lurker star.

Dr. Leiner discovered that this was the remnant of a triple system, where two closely orbiting stars merged and blew their outer envelope away, leaving behind the white dwarf. This caused accretion onto the third star — the blue lurker — which sped up its rotation. Triple star systems are fairly common (around 10% of Sun-like stars are in a triple system), they are only beginning to be understood. | Press release

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: Punching Back Asteroids: The Deflection of Dimorphos by the DART Mission, Jason Kalirai (Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory) (by Bill Smith)

Everyone who takes an introductory astronomy class learns about calculating orbits of celestial bodies, but Dr. Kalirai’s talk focused on humanity’s first successful attempt to change one. He gave an overview of the DART (Double Asteroid Redirection Test) mission, a mission designed to test our capabilities to defend Earth from an asteroid that might be heading towards impact by sending a spacecraft to smash into the asteroid to see if the impact could alter an asteroid’s trajectory to miss impact.

He began with a charge for humanity: “Let’s not be like the dinosaurs!” He followed this up with an overview of the potential threat, noting that we still haven’t found many of the asteroids that could hit Earth that are big enough to result in planetary-scale catastrophic consequences, noting examples like the Chelyabinsk impact in Russia.

He began his explanation of the mission by explaining why the “D” in DART stands for “Double.” Because asteroids orbit the Sun, it would be impossible with current technology to measure the change in an orbit of one due to the impact of a spacecraft. To get around this, the DART team identified two asteroids in a binary orbit around each other. By crashing the craft into one of them, they are able to measure the impact’s effect by studying the change to the binary orbit of the asteroids, so they ultimately decided on the Didymos–Dimorphos asteroid binary system as their target.

Next, Dr. Kalirai discussed some of the unique technical challenges of the mission, including installing a CubeSat called LICIA that would deploy before impact to collect data about the impact, and the automated guiding system that was necessary for the spacecraft to the smaller of the two asteroids in the system, because it was not identifiable until the spacecraft was essentially almost there.

Dr. Kalirai then reviewed what the DART mission team learned from the impact itself. First, it slowed the orbital period of the asteroid by about a half hour, when the original goal of the mission was about 7 minutes. They measured the momentum enhancement (called a beta), which was a factor of 3.6. A beta factor of 1 indicates the amount of momentum transfer if the craft simply hit the asteroid with no ejected material, and a beta factor higher than this indicates that the ejected material from the impact further affected the asteroid’s orbit. A measurement of 3.6 was higher than anticipated, and provided an optimistic result for this technique’s ability to potentially defend Earth in the future.

A slide from Dr. Kalirai’s talk. On the left is a simulation snapshot of a DART-like spacecraft impacting a dense rocky object of similar size to the target asteroid, and on the right is an image soon after the impact of the spacecraft and asteroid.

Dr. Kalirai concluded with two main points. First, although the DART mission itself was successful, he stressed the need to find the asteroids we still don’t know about and highlighted the future Near-Earth Object Surveyor Mission. Second, he described a “table top exercise” between multiple national, state, and local agencies to simulate a potential asteroid impact on Earth. He noted that the outcome of the exercise was that, even if the technology might exist, it must still be deployed by collaboration of governments and agencies working together to do it for it to be effective.

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: Direct Observational Constraints on Planet Formation and Accretion, Kate Follette (Amherst College) (by Jessie Thwaites)

Dr. Follette’s talk focused on two of her favorite topics: direct imaging techniques for detecting exoplanets, and effectively teaching students both inside and beyond the field of astronomy. She brought those techniques to life in her talk, requiring audience participation throughout and highlighting the importance of understanding other worlds through high-contrast detections.

Dr. Follette outlined four main methods of exoplanet detection (three of which are described in this Astrobite): transit photometry, where a planet eclipses its star and causes a dip in brightness; radial velocity, where the wobble of the star indicates the presence of a planet; microlensing, where a planet passing in front of a star causes a brief increase in brightness; and direct imaging — Dr. Follette’s speciality.

As she describes, there are many reasons to love direct imaging, from the visceral satisfaction of being able to identify planets by eye in the data to the amount of information one can obtain from the technique. Direct imaging can help characterize orbits of these planets and enable detailed modeling of an exoplanet’s atmosphere through analysis of its spectrum. The planets imaged with this technique tend to be young, as young planets tend to be brighter than older planets.

This field is also rapidly developing both technology and methodology to hopefully detect exo-Earths (smaller, Earth-sized exoplanets) in the future, and to identify biosignatures in their atmospheres. Direct imaging is built on sophisticated and rapidly evolving hardware and software techniques, including adaptive optics, coronagraphy, differential imaging techniques, and post-processing algorithms. Dr. Follette has also written a tutorial for anyone interested in learning more about the field.

A slide from Dr. Follette’s talk, highlighting their method for identifying protoplanets in a disk.

To search for exoplanets, the team considered circumstellar disks, which can have a variety of substructure — some of which is likely due to the presence of exoplanets! The challenge is identifying the planet itself in the data. They optimize their selection methods on injected signals; that way, they avoid confirmation bias. They search for the planets in the wavelength range where the planets are brightest, specifically in the H-alpha line, and subtract these measurements from the main emission of the disk (shown in the above figure). With this method they are able to identify several planets in their sample! From there, they aim to translate the detected light into a physical parameter by inferring the properties of planet populations.

In the final part of the talk, Dr. Follette focused on physics education and mentorship. There are several courses in the undergraduate curriculum at Amherst College aimed at developing students’ soft skills for research, including setting goals, time management, presentation skills, and becoming more comfortable asking questions. These are important skills to help close the opportunity gaps that some students may face. Dr. Follette also emphasized the importance of normalizing struggling (which happens to everyone!) and celebrating non-linear career paths, as well as non-astronomy or non-academic paths for students.

Return to Table of Contents.

banner announcing the 245th meeting of the American Astronomical Society

This week, AAS Nova and Astrobites are attending the American Astronomical Society (AAS) winter meeting in National Harbor, MD.

AAS Nova Editors Kerry Hensley and Susanna Kohler and AAS Media Fellow Lexi Gault will join Astrobites Media Intern Lindsey Gordon and Astrobiters Archana Aravindan, Bill Smith, and Jessie Thwaites to live-blog the meeting for all those who aren’t attending or can’t make it to all the sessions they’d like. We plan to cover all of the plenaries and press conferences, so follow along here on aasnova.org or on astrobites.org! You can also follow Astrobites on Bluesky at astrobites.bsky.social for more meeting content.

Where can you find us during the meeting? We’ll be at the Astrobites booth in the Exhibit Hall all week — stop by and say hello! You can also find Kerry, Susanna, and Lexi at the press conferences Monday through Thursday. AAS press conferences are open to all, and they can also be viewed on the AAS Press Office YouTube channel for anyone not attending the meeting.


Sessions Organized by and Recommended by Astrobiters

The Astrobites crew recommends the National Osterbrock Leadership Program splinter session. This session, titled “Deepening Broader Impacts: Mentorship, DEI, and Career Advancement” (link takes you to the listing in the meeting program; must be logged in for the link to take you to the right place), will be held Tuesday, 14 January, from 10:30 am to 12:00 pm in room Chesapeake 7-8. This splinter session will feature several presentations as well as an interactive workshop, with a focus on deepening broader impacts, strengthening NSF proposals, and acquainting attendees with the National Osterbrock Leadership Program.

We are excited to share that the League of Underrepresented Minoritized Astronomers (LUMA) will be celebrating its 10-year anniversary in 2025 through an AAS Splinter Session titled “IlLUMAnating Conversations” on Wednesday, 15 January 2025, from 9:30 am to 5:00 pm ET. This splinter session will be open to ALL people of color of ALL career stages, not only to LUMA members, so please share with your networks! However, we do ask you kindly fill out this form to confirm your attendance and RSVP as this is a private event by invitation only.

LUMA is a peer mentoring community for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx women across all career stages in the space sciences. Our goal is to provide a safe, supportive virtual community where you can belong and shine. The IlLUMAnating Conversations session marks our 10th anniversary as an organization, and we are celebrating by coming together at AAS 245 for a series of workshops, talks, and community bonding activities for both current members and others in the AAS community interested in attending.

Our morning session will focus on learning how to identify, leverage, and grow your unique skills to benefit your career. We will reconvene after lunch for an afternoon session to explore ways to build deeper relationships within your community and advocate effectively for yourself and others. If you’re looking to make new friends, find a conference buddy, or learn new skills, please join us! You also can attend either the morning or afternoon session, or attend both sessions if you’d like to get more out of it! We will be having a day full of inspiring talks and meaningful workshops to equip you to succeed in your careers and effect change in your communities!

Finally, you can read the currently published AAS 245 keynote speaker interviews here. Be sure to check back all week as the remainder are released!

banner announcing the 245th meeting of the American Astronomical Society

AAS 245 is nearly here! The AAS Publishing team looks forward to connecting with meeting attendees at the upcoming winter AAS meeting in National Harbor, MD, and we’re excited to share a preview of upcoming publishing-related events. Attending the meeting will be Kerry Kroffe (AAS Director of Scholarly Publishing), Ethan Vishniac (AAS Journals Editor in Chief), Gus Muench (AAS Journals Data Editor), and Greg Schwarz (AAS Journals Data Editor). Several of the scientific editors of the AAS journals, including Frank Timmes (Associate Editor in Chief and Lead Editor of the High Energy Phenomena and Fundamental Physics research corridor) and Mubdi Rahman (Scientific Editor for the Laboratory Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Software, and Data research corridor), will be in attendance as well. Be sure to stop by the AAS booth in the Exhibit Hall to say hello, chat about the journals, have your data questions answered, and pick up some swag!

AAS Nova Editors Kerry Hensley and Susanna Kohler, AAS Media Fellow Lexi Gault, Astrobites Media Intern Lindsey Gordon, and the rest of the Astrobites team will also be available periodically at the Astrobites booth in the Exhibit Hall. We look forward to seeing you there!


Data Editors Help Desk

AAS Journals Data Editors Gus Muench and Greg Schwarz will be staffing a data help desk during AAS 245. Please drop by the AAS Publications stand in the main AAS booth to hear more about upcoming changes to AASTeX (v7!), or to discuss best practices for data and software publication in the AAS journals. Gus and Greg are looking forward to your tough data questions!


Open Science at AAS 245

Note: The links in this section take you to the corresponding entries in the AAS 245 block schedule. You must be logged in for the links to work correctly; otherwise, they will take you to the main block schedule page.

On Monday, there is an exciting splinter session from 10:00 am to 12:00 pm titled “ExoCore: An Open Science Curriculum for Enhanced Reproducibility and Equity in Exoplanet Research.” The intended audience ranges from students and postdocs working on exoplanet research to those interested in the ethos and methods of open science in general. The session will include presentations, a guided discussion, and a hands-on tutorial. This session takes place in National Harbor 8.

On Wednesday from 2:00 to 3:30 pm, NASA is hosting a special session (#347) on “Open Science: NASA Astrophysics in the Roman Era.” This session focuses on new initiatives to facilitate the sharing of data and computational resources across NASA as new missions like Roman move data storage and analysis on to cloud-based science platforms. This session will be held in Chesapeake 4-5.

We also want to draw your attention to a special session (#425) on Thursday morning from 10:00 to 11:30 am. “The Power of Collaborative Networks in the Era of Big Data” will use presentations and a moderated discussion to explore the importance of collaborative networks to doing science in the current era of big data. Collaborative networks, which can be anything from citizen science teams to international science communities, will be critical to making best use of incoming massive datasets, such as the one that will be generated by the Vera C. Rubin Legacy Survey of Space and Time. This session will be held in Chesapeake 4-5.

banner announcing the 175th anniversary of the Astronomical Journal

The first issue of The Astronomical Journal (AJ) was published 175 years ago this month. This remarkable history means that the journal has persisted through the American Civil War and both World Wars, through 35 presidential administrations, and even through the development of “astronomer” as a profession in North America — it wasn’t until 50 years after the AJ’s launch that the continent founded its first professional society of astronomers, the American Astronomical Society.

As the first astronomy-focused academic journal to be published outside of Europe, the AJ has come a long way: its first issue — containing just a single printed article (“Development of the Perturbative Function of Planetary Motion”) — would have had limited circulation among the small but growing community of North Americans interested in astronomy. Now, as a fully open-access electronic journal, the AJ garners more than 100,000 views per year.

Early issues of the journal presented major advances in solar system and stellar science, laying the groundwork for modern discoveries in these fields. In the pages of the AJ, you can find foundational work establishing the ubiquity of black holes in the centers of galaxies, an examination of the iconic Hubble Deep Field, and Nobel-prize-winning evidence for the accelerating expansion of the universe, to name just a few works. Today, impactful observational results can be found alongside major advances in instrumentation, surveys, and software, such as the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, and the astropy codebase.

To celebrate this remarkable milestone, we invite you to join us in looking back on the journal’s history using this interactive timeline. Here’s to 175 more years!

Io with a volcanic plume

Editor’s Note: This week we’ll be writing updates on selected events at the 56th Division for Planetary Sciences (DPS) meeting happening in Boise, Idaho, and online. The usual posting schedule for AAS Nova will resume on October 14th.

Table of Contents:


The Open-Source Science Initiative at NASA (J.L. Galache)

J.L. Galache (Agile Decision Sciences, NASA HQ) opened the session with a brief primer on open-science initiatives at NASA. Essentially, open science is the act of making your data, software, and publications freely accessible to all. Open science benefits the planetary science community by lowering barriers to entry and enhancing reproducibility of research. (Of course, open science also benefits you because your freely accessible data and publications will be cited more often!) NASA approaches open-science implementation through funding (sunpy and astropy have received funding from NASA, among many other recognizable names in science software), training, and policy. Current policy states that data and software should be made available at the time the research is published, and publications should be made available through a pre-print server (e.g., arXiv) if not being published in an open-access journal. Among the existing training options is Open Science 101, an online training module through which 1,900 people have already been accredited.

Return to Table of Contents.


Digging Deep: Unveiling Vertical Mixing and the Core Mass of Giant Exoplanets with JWST (David Sing)

David Sing (Johns Hopkins University), winner of the 2024 Alexander Prize for outstanding contributions that have significantly advanced our knowledge of planetary systems, described the journey to understanding exoplanet atmospheres and interiors from Hubble to JWST. Sing focused on the transit method, which has enabled the discovery of thousands of planets beyond our solar system and increasingly allows scientists to probe the atmospheres of those worlds.

With Hubble, scientists were able to test their models of photochemical equilibrium in exoplanet atmospheres, which predicted broad compositional trends with planet temperature. Hubble observations confirmed the basic picture of the chemical composition of hot Jupiters while also revealing complexities like clouds and hazes, which make it difficult to extract chemical abundances from spectra, and the presence of disequilibrium chemistry, which required extra attention from modelers.

plot of mass–metallicity relationship for planets and exoplanets

The mass–metallicity relationship for solar system planets (black points) and exoplanets (colored points). Click to enlarge. [From slide by David Sing]

Hubble observations raised further questions about giant planets, such as the state of their chemical disequilibrium, vertical mixing, horizontal mixing, and even their formation mechanism. Giant planet formation can be probed by measurements of planetary core mass fraction, with the core accretion model predicting that giant planets have roughly 10-Earth-mass rocky cores. In addition, the core accretion model predicts that as a planet’s mass increases, its overall metallicity decreases due to the accumulation of a massive envelope of hydrogen and helium. The giant planets in our solar system follow the predicted relationship, but the evidence for gas giant exoplanets is less clear. What can JWST tell us about the lingering issues in giant planet formation, chemistry, and mixing?

JWST spectrum of WASP-39b

JWST spectrum of WASP-39b’s atmosphere and best-fitting model. [From slide by David Sing]

Enter the JWST Transiting Exoplanet Community Early Release Science Program, which aimed to provide science results from phase curve, primary transit, and secondary eclipse observations of exoplanets while testing and leading to a greater understanding of the capabilities of JWST instruments. Sing highlighted the results of JWST transit observations of WASP-39b, which showed a prominent spectral feature from carbon dioxide (not seen by Hubble) as well as a feature at 4 microns that wasn’t predicted by models. This feature belonged to SO2, showing the first sign of photochemistry in an exoplanet. (SO2 is produced through the reaction of H2S with water molecules that have been split apart by starlight.)

Sing also described the important results from JWST observations of two other exoplanets, HAT-P-18b and WASP-107b. These are both cool/warm gas giants that are expected to have methane in their atmospheres. HAT-P-18b showed no sign of methane in its atmosphere — since the molecule is expected to exist, does this mean it’s being destroyed by photochemistry or by mixing into the deep, hot atmosphere of the planet?

Observations of WASP-107b provided more clues: in addition to CO2 and water, JWST observations of WASP-107b showed at last a hint of methane. However, there was about a thousand times less methane than expected given the planet’s temperature. By modeling both vertical mixing and photochemistry, Sing’s team showed that the methane depletion was due to mixing. Going further with these data, they used interior structure modeling to estimate the mass of the core at 11.5 Earth masses — consistent with predictions of the core accretion model.

Up next is the exoplanet grand tour spectroscopic survey, which will observe 25 exoplanets during 125 hours of JWST time. Stay tuned for news from this survey — the first data are being collected roughly 24 hours after this talk!

Return to Table of Contents.


Tracing the Heating of the Solar System Through Geochemical Signatures (Katherine de Kleer)

Katherine de Kleer (California Institute of Technology), winner of the 2024 Harold C. Urey prize for outstanding achievements in planetary science by an early-career scientist, described recent work on the history of heating in the solar system. De Kleer and collaborators use the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) to understand where, when, and how objects in the solar system were heated and how that drives the chemical evolution of and geological activity on those objects today.

Let’s take things all the way back to the early days of the solar system: in the beginning, there was aluminum-26, a once-abundant, radioactive form of aluminum that heated the infant solar system. Heating from aluminum-26 melted early planetesimals and caused them to differentiate, separating into distinct compositional layers. Some of these planetesimals clumped together to form what are today the planets in our solar system, while others collided, leaving their remains scattered through the solar system as asteroids. The fragments of planetesimals in the asteroid belt can tell us about differentiation and, thus, heating in the protoplanetary disk that birthed our solar system.

thermal emission from asteroid Psyche

The thermal glow of asteroid 16 Psyche as seen by ALMA. [From slide by Katherine de Kleer]

Using ALMA, de Kleer observed the thermal emission from large main-belt asteroids — with an incredible resolution of 30 kilometers — and modeled the observations. The data show high emissivity (indicative of large metal content) but low polarization (indicative of scattering due to metal inclusions). This suggests that rather than having metal tied up in minerals, the metal in these asteroids likely exists in the form of numerous metallic chunks.

While heating is still ongoing in the solar system today, radiogenic heating — heating from the decay of radioactive material — is not as important as it once was. Now, small bodies are largely heated through tidal heating. The most dramatic example of the effects of tidal heating is Jupiter’s moon Io — the most volcanically active body in the solar system. Tidal heating melts Io’s rocky interior, which then gushes through the moon’s 400 active volcanoes to its surface.

Many images of Io and its volcanoes

Many views of the infrared glow of Io and its many volcanoes. Wavelength increases toward the bottom. Click to enlarge. [Slide by Katherine de Kleer]

By studying when and where Io’s volcanoes erupt, de Kleer’s team hopes to learn about Io’s interior, including where tidal heating is deposited. Tidal heating models predict specific distributions of Io’s volcanoes, but after 300 nights of observing Io (covering many revolutions around Jupiter), there doesn’t appear to be any cyclical behavior to the eruptions, nor does the spatial distribution appear to match the models well. This could mean that convection in Io’s mantle is obscuring the signature of tidal heating, or there could be stochastic geological processes at play.

Scientists have studied volcanic activity on Io for forty years, but the moon has been active much, much longer. If Io has been trapped in a resonance with fellow moons Europa and Ganymede for billions of years, as research suggests, it must have lost the equivalent of its entire mantle contents many times over, churning through and reprocessing this mantle material repeatedly. Another way of looking at Io’s evolution over time is through its atmosphere. Sulfur — an abundant component of Io — is lost to space from the moon’s upper atmosphere. Because different isotopes of sulfur have different masses, lighter isotopes are held less tightly to the moon and are preferentially removed from the atmosphere. By measuring the ratio of different isotopes of sulfur, de Kleer showed that Io has lost 94–99% of its available sulfur, supporting the picture of a dramatically, dynamically heated and evolving world.

Return to Table of Contents.

JWST image of Uranus and its moons

Editor’s Note: This week we’ll be writing updates on selected events at the 56th Division for Planetary Sciences (DPS) meeting happening in Boise, Idaho, and online. The usual posting schedule for AAS Nova will resume on October 14th.

Table of Contents:


Plenary Lecture: Addressing Mental Health in Planetary Science: Big and Small Steps to Creating an Environment that Supports Well-Being (David Trang)

Planetary scientist and mental health counselor David Trang (Space Science Institute) discussed the results of recent surveys of mental health among planetary scientists and strategies to improve the health of the community. Mental health is a pressing issue for our community: 76% of planetary scientists surveyed reported having anxious or depressive symptoms that made it at least somewhat difficult to perform work duties, take care of things at home, or get along with others. Twenty-nine percent of respondents found these tasks difficult, while 9% of respondents said they found these tasks very difficult.

These issues affect everyone: even if you’re not personally experiencing symptoms, the collaborative nature of planetary science means that someone you work with likely is. Distracting thoughts associated with anxiety, stress, and depression occupy short-term memory, affecting research quality, the ability to develop new ideas, interpret data, and more. Aside from research quality, poor mental health worsens physical and social health as well.

results of survey of anxiety among planetary scientists

Prevalence of clinically significant anxiety among planetary scientists in 2022 and 2023. Rates are compared against the general population during (red line) and before (green line) the COVID pandemic. Click to enlarge. [Slide by David Trang]

To examine the mental health of our community, Trang surveyed roughly 300 planetary scientists in 2022 and 2023, using common anxiety, stress, and depression assessments. The survey indicated higher than average anxiety and depression among female, POC, LGBTQ+, and early career respondents. Notably, graduate students had the highest prevalence of anxiety and depression of any of the groups surveyed. While stress, anxiety, and depression decreased for nearly all demographic groups in 2023 compared to 2022, even after decreasing to 2023 levels, planetary scientists across the board remained more stressed, anxious, and depressed than the average respondent from the general public, pre-COVID. For almost all groups, levels remained higher among planetary scientists in 2023 than the general population during the peak of COVID.

Overall, the results show a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of anxiety, stress, and depression between members of marginalized groups and members of non-marginalized groups. While this difference may reflect larger cultural and societal issues, it also presents an opportunity for planetary science participation to become a protective factor against these larger issues.

survey results showing differences in depression and anxiety between mission participants and non-participants

Prevalence of clinically significant anxiety and depression among mission participants (purple) and non-participants (blue). The white shapes indicate statistically significant results. Click to enlarge. [Slide by David Trang]

In what way might the planetary science community be protective? As an example, Trang showed that there are statistically significant differences in the prevalence of anxiety and depression between scientists that participate in missions and those that do not. Why mission participation has a protective effect isn’t yet clear, but Trang hypothesized that mission participation creates a sense of belonging to a group, and it also pairs early career scientists with a larger number of potential mentors, increasing the chances of there being a positive mentor relationship. (During the Q&A, audience members proposed other potential factors, such as stability of funding and the impact of working toward a common goal.)

To bring these positive aspects of mission participation to all planetary scientists, Trang suggested creating more teams (not just missions, but research institutes and interest groups as well) and improving mentorship for early career scientists. To achieve the latter goal, institutions could implement mandatory mentorship training for graduate advisors or invest in a mentor advisor to provide career mentorship to a large number of graduate students, reducing the burden on graduate research advisors.

plot of top contributors to depression

Top contributors to depression. Click to enlarge. [Slide by David Trang]

In addition to these larger policy changes, individuals can make small changes that have a big impact. One area of focus is expressing appreciation, as many of those surveyed said that not feeling appreciated was a major contributor to their anxiety or depression. Trang suggests that simply saying thank you with one sentence explaining why you’re grateful can go a long way. And as someone receiving an expression of appreciation, be sure to say how you felt about it (e.g., “You’re so welcome, I’m happy to hear that you found it helpful!”) — this makes it a positive experience for everyone involved.

Trang presented two other strategies that can help people feel appreciated: focusing on strengths and complimenting the process. As scientists — especially scientists in advisor roles — it’s easy to focus on what’s wrong and what needs improvement. For example, when editing a student’s manuscript, it’s natural to point out what needs to be fixed. But don’t forget to focus on what’s been done well (e.g., “You did a great job of reviewing past work in the introduction. Let’s bring that same strategy to the discussion section.”). Similarly, it’s easy to congratulate or compliment someone after a major achievement — say, being awarded a grant — so try to compliment the steps of the process as well. For example, take the time to acknowledge the hard work that went into writing an excellent proposal, even if it wasn’t selected.

Want to implement these changes in your life? Set SMART goals, Trang suggests. Give yourself a Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound goal, such as pointing out two strengths each time you review a paper this year. Through individual efforts and broad policy changes, we can make the planetary science community a healthier place.

Return to Table of Contents.


Press Conference: Amy Simon, Richard Cartwright, Mariah Jones (Briefing video)

First to speak was Amy Simon (NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center), who presented results from a long-term study of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot. The famous Great Red Spot is the largest storm in the solar system, spanning 10,000 miles (~16,000 km). Although it’s been a constant feature of Jupiter’s disk for centuries, it’s both steadily shrinking and changing in more subtle ways. Simon’s team used the Hubble Space Telescope to investigate the Great Red Spot’s 90-day oscillations, which are periodic changes in the rate at which the storm drifts westward. This rate oscillation is seen in historical and ground-based data. The Hubble observations showed that many aspects of the spot varied over the course of 90 days. The spot’s semimajor axis varied, though it’s north–south extent did not, and the height and width of the deep-red core changed.

Great Red Spot with regions labeled

Regions of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot. [From slide by Amy Simon]

All of these changes were roughly in phase with one another. Other changes, such as changes to the reflectance of the core of the spot and the collar region just outside the core, were out of phase with each other. Some parameters were also correlated, such as the spot’s size and speed; the spot is largest when it is moving most slowly. The core is also brightest when the spot is largest, although this change is small. An analysis of the wind velocity field showed that the surrounding velocity isn’t compensating for the other oscillations. This indicates that a simple two-dimensional model in which changes in vorticity balance the oscillations doesn’t apply to this system, and the three-dimensional atmospheric structure must be more complex.

Uranus's moon Ariel

Ariel as seen by Voyager 2 in 1986. [NASA/JPL]

Next, Richard Cartwright (Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory) brought things farther out in the solar system with new JWST observations of Ariel, the fourth-largest moon of Uranus. The JWST data revealed the presence of CO2 and CO ice on the moon’s surface. This finding is intriguing because these materials likely escape to space over time, so they must be replenished somehow. CO2 ice might form via irradiation of materials on the moon’s surface by energetic particles trapped in Uranus’s magnetosphere. The alternative, which is favored by the JWST data, is that CO2 gas could escape from a reservoir below the surface and condense on the surface.

JWST spectrum of Ariel

JWST observations of Ariel. The spectra show clear signals from CO2, CO, and H2O, plus a tentative hint of CO3. Click to enlarge. [From slide by Richard Cartwright]

A potential reservoir could be a subsurface ocean rich in CO2, CO, and possibly CO3. If CO3 were to be found on Ariel’s surface, that would be strong evidence for the presence of such an ocean, since it’s a difficult compound to make on the surface of an airless body. The JWST data show a tiny hint of a CO3 feature as well as a feature that could be interpreted as being due to clathrates — chemical lattices that trap molecules. Both of these features, if confirmed, would provide firm evidence for the subsurface ocean hypothesis. Curiously, the data show no hint of hydrogen peroxide, which has been seen on the moons Europa, Ganymede, Enceladus, and Charon. This might hint that the radiation environment at Ariel is quieter than expected.

Future work will dive deeper into new JWST observations of Uranian moons Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon. Preliminary analysis of the JWST spectra shows the first evidence of CO ice on these worlds.

simulation results for simulated co-orbitals in exoplanet systems

Comparison of the results for TRAPPIST-1 (top), a resonant system, and Kepler-90 (bottom), a non-resonant system. More of the synthetic co-orbitals remained in stable configurations in the Kepler-90 system. Click to enlarge. [From slides by Mariah Jones]

Finally, Mariah Jones (Vassar College/SETI Institute) took things out of the solar system altogether with a theoretical exploration of co-orbiting bodies in exoplanet systems. Co-orbitals are bodies that share an orbit. For example, the Jupiter trojan asteroids share Jupiter’s orbit. Trojans are a class of co-orbitals that sit 60 degrees in front of and 60 degrees behind a planet. Horseshoes are co-orbitals with a more complex configuration, librating around 180 degrees from their host planet. In our solar system, Mars, Jupiter, and Neptune host stable populations of co-orbiting bodies, but Saturn and Uranus do not. The reason for this may be that Saturn and Uranus are both in near-resonance with Jupiter and Neptune, respectively. Orbital resonance refers to a setup in which the orbital periods of two or more bodies are integer multiples of one another.

Jones and collaborators used dynamical modeling to investigate if the presence of resonance in a planetary system affects the long-term stability of co-orbital populations. They collected initial conditions for several multi-planet systems from the NASA Exoplanet Archive and injected 20 synthetic co-orbitals into each system. They found a variety of behaviors, including stable trojans and horseshoes, no stable solutions, or switching between stable trojan and horseshoe configurations. They found that stable configurations were more likely for systems without resonance. This trend might happen because in a resonant system, bodies that are co-orbital with one planet are also in resonance with another planet, destabilizing the configuration.

Slides from these three presentations are available in the press kit.

Return to Table of Contents.

Titan and Saturn

Editor’s Note: This week we’ll be writing updates on selected events at the 56th Division for Planetary Sciences (DPS) meeting happening in Boise, Idaho, and online. The usual posting schedule for AAS Nova will resume on October 14th.

Table of Contents:


Plenary Lecture: Planetary Habitability in the Solar System and Beyond (Stephen Kane)

What is planetary habitability? This deceptively simple question posed by Stephen Kane (University of California, Riverside) is surprisingly controversial. Kane defines the answer as an assessment of the energy balance at a planet’s surface and what influences that balance over time. When looking at the vast sample of exoplanets — nearly 6,000 are currently known — Earth-size planets are common, opening up the possibility that the circumstances necessary for habitability are common as well.

image of Venus featuring swirling clouds

Venus as seen by the Mariner 10 spacecraft. [NASA/JPL-Caltech]

But the problem is a tricky one. Take Venus, for example. To a distant observer, Venus and Earth are both “Earth-like” planets, but only Earth is habitable today. The differences between the two are many — Venus is 30% closer to the Sun and receives twice the solar flux, and it also lacks a moon, rotates extremely slowly and nearly perfectly upside down, lacks a magnetic field, and lacks plate tectonics — but it’s not yet clear which of these properties are responsible for the hellish conditions on Venus today. Time is also an important factor: as recently as a billion years ago, Venus may have had surface water.

Water is a recurring theme in discussions of habitability, since one framework within which to assess a planet’s energy balance is whether a planet is able to sustain liquid water on its surface. This framework is reasonable — and not unreasonably Earth-centric — because water is common throughout the universe, it’s a solvent in which biochemical reactions can take place, and it remains liquid up to (relatively) high temperatures, allowing chemical reactions necessary for life to proceed quickly.

graphic listing the many factors important for planetary habitability

The multitude of factors that could impact planetary habitability. What this graphic doesn’t show — and what’s critical to find out — is the relative importance of these factors and the connections between them. Click to enlarge. [Slide by Stephen Kane; originally from Vicky Meadows and Rory Barnes]

There are many interconnected factors that play a role in determining a planet’s energy balance, and it’s challenging to understand which are most important. To approach this problem, Kane suggests using the “statistical hammer” of exoplanets and taking cues from our own solar system’s evolutionary history. As an example of what we can learn from our own solar system, Kane pointed to Mars, which has an interesting habitability history. Mars has been examined closely by the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) mission for a decade, and MAVEN measurements show that Mars once had a surface pressure similar to present-day Earth. Today, Mars has lost much of its atmosphere, rendering the planet cold and dry.

Atmospheric loss is important when considering exoplanets as well. In the TRAPPIST-1 system, which is famous for containing seven terrestrial planets, three or four of which are in their star’s habitable zone, recent JWST observations suggest that the two planets closest to the star have little to no atmosphere. (A hazy or cloudy atmosphere is possible for TRAPPIST-1 c, but TRAPPIST-1 b is extremely unlikely to have any kind of atmosphere.)

Another consideration for exoplanetary systems is the presence or absence of giant planets. Our solar system may be unusual among planetary systems because it contains four giant planets beyond the snow line (the distance from the Sun at which water exists as ice). Many other known exoplanet systems contain giant planets closer to their stars, which may prevent Earth-size planets from attaining stable orbits in the habitable zone. However, a well-placed giant planet may be critical for the habitability of Earth-like planets; giant planets positioned beyond the snow line can transport volatiles (critically, water ice) into the inner solar system. While Jupiter has a nearly circular orbit, researchers see giant planets beyond the snow line with a wide range of orbital eccentricities — and it turns out that giant planets with more elliptical orbits are actually better at scattering volatiles toward would-be Earths.

In the conclusion, Kane added a rather somber comment about the challenge of assessing planetary habitability: modeling suggests that the three biggest factors determining Venus’s current uninhabitability are the incident solar flux, Venus’s slow rotation rate, and its lack of plate tectonics. A distant observer could easily pin down the first of those three factors, but the other two are difficult or impossible to determine from afar.

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: From Venus to Exoplanets and Back Again (Cedric Gillmann)

Cédric Gillmann (ETH Zurich) brought the discussion back to Venus in the second talk of the session. Seen from afar, it would be very difficult to distinguish Venus from Earth because the two planets have similar basic properties. This fact led Venus to be a prominent target of early solar system exploration, with some observers expecting Venus to be a sort of warm and humid “space Florida.” Instead, images from the surface revealed Venus to be dry and lifeless, though more Earth-like than it seemed at first glance: the images showed basaltic (composed of volcanic rock) plains similar to those found on Earth.

That might be where the similarities between Venus and Earth end. Though Venus and Earth both have volcanoes, the type and distribution of volcanic features is dissimilar, suggesting that something in Venus’s interior is markedly different from Earth’s. Venus also has a staggeringly high surface pressure (more than 90 times Earth’s surface pressure) and temperature (hot enough to melt lead) and an atmosphere rich in carbon dioxide, with some nitrogen and just a trace of water.

Comparison of known Venus zone and habitable zone planets

Comparison of known Venus zone and habitable zone planets. [Slide by Cédric GIllmann]

Much remains unknown about Venus. Observations suggest that the planet has lost much of its atmosphere, but it’s not yet clear how much was lost and when. Luckily, several missions to Venus are in preparation that will help researchers learn more about our neighboring planet — and about exoplanets as well. Given the bias toward finding short-period exoplanets, we know of more planets in the “Venus zone” than in the habitable zone. By studying Venus, we can learn more about these Venus-zone exoplanets that we’ll never be able to observe at close quarters.

This is just one example of how exoplanet studies increasingly benefit from solar system studies. Certain factors, especially those related to planetary interiors, can never be measured directly for exoplanets but can be investigated for solar system planets. Gillmann pointed to the mantle as an especially important factor; as a planet’s mantle evolves, it affects the planet’s core and cools the planet. It also affects volcanism, which in turn affects the planet’s atmosphere, making it central to the planet’s overall evolution.

In summary, Venus represents a planet whose evolutionary history is likely complicated and is still uncertain, though upcoming missions like EnVision and VERITAS should help to illuminate its past. By studying the relatively accessible Venus, astronomers can learn more about planets that we’ll never get to see up close.

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: ExoTitans: Connecting Solar System and Exoplanet Studies (Kathleen Mandt)

In the final talk of the session, Kathy Mandt (NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center) took the habitability discussion in a colder direction, whisking the audience to the ocean worlds of the outer solar system. Our solar system contains several moons with liquid oceans beneath their icy surfaces. The Europa Clipper mission, which is scheduled to launch no sooner than 12 October, will explore one of these ocean worlds in detail.

Ocean worlds are an enticing place to look for life beyond Earth, but it’s exceedingly difficult to study the oceans directly. It’s unknown how thick the ice shells may be, and even drilling through antarctic ice on Earth is difficult. This means that studying the subsurface ocean on an exoplanet will be beyond our reach. Is there an easier way to study exoplanet ocean worlds?

Titan's polar seas

Radar image of Titan’s north polar seas. [NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASI]

Saturn’s largest moon, Titan, may be the best place to start to learn about exoplanet ocean worlds. Titan has a thick atmosphere composed mainly of nitrogen and methane, which react to form complex hydrocarbons and nitriles, creating haze. It also has a multitude of lakes and seas filled with a freezing, oily mixture of liquid methane and ethane. There are 130 recorded flybys of Titan by the Cassini spacecraft, providing ample data to compare to exoplanet observations.

Titan-like exoplanets are likely to be common, but our current detection capabilities limit the number of candidate exo-Titans — because these planets must be cold, they must be located farther from their stars, making them harder to detect with the transit method.

illustration of the TRAPPIST-1 planets

An artist’s rendition of the seven known planets in the TRAPPIST-1 system, based on data taken through 2018. [NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt, T. Pyle (IPAC)]

One candidate exo-Titan is TRAPPIST-1 h, the outermost of the known TRAPPIST-1 planets. Based on its bulk density, TRAPPIST-1 h’s water-to-rock ratio is higher than Earth’s but lower than Titan’s, placing it somewhere around Europa. TRAPPIST-1 h may have cryovolcanoes, and climate modeling shows that while it’s too warm for liquid methane — a critical component of Titan’s hydrocarbon seas — it’s the right temperature for liquid ethane.

If TRAPPIST-1 h is an exo-Titan, what would JWST enable us to learn about its atmosphere? Mandt’s team performed atmospheric modeling of exo-Titans to estimate what JWST would see when looking at such a planet. They found that it was often difficult to back out the input properties of a planet since there was a lot of degeneracy between temperature and pressure. Some factors, such as eddy diffusion, were impossible to discern at JWST-accessible infrared wavelengths but could be probed by an ultraviolet telescope.

Next, Mandt’s team plans to incorporate more complex photochemistry in their model, which will likely be challenging. TRAPPIST-1 is an M dwarf, which means that the star is variable at the X-ray and ultraviolet wavelengths that drive chemical reactions.

Ultimately, Mandt emphasized the importance of planetary scientists and exoplanet scientists working together, leveraging past knowledge from Cassini and upcoming insights from the Dragonfly mission to interpret observations of exo-Titans and other ocean worlds.

Return to Table of Contents.

image of Europa

Editor’s Note: This week we’ll be writing updates on selected events at the 56th Division for Planetary Sciences (DPS) meeting happening in Boise, Idaho, and online. The usual posting schedule for AAS Nova will resume on October 14th.

Table of Contents:


Press Conference: Quanzhi Ye, Elizabeth Silber, and Victor Oyiboka (Briefing video)

The first of two press conference sessions at this year’s DPS meeting featured research regarding small bodies and planets of the inner solar system. First up was Quanzhi Ye (University of Maryland/Boston University), who described a search for potentially hazardous asteroids in the Taurid complex. The Taurid complex is a collection of debris from comet 2P/Encke, which descended from a parent body some 10,000–20,000 years ago. The size of the parent body is unknown but may have been as large as 100 kilometers across. When Earth passes through the debris left behind by this comet, observers on the ground see a meteor shower. Unlike better-known meteor showers like the Perseids, the Taurids aren’t particularly active, but they are unusually rich in large particles that create dramatic fireballs when they burn up in Earth’s atmosphere.

The Taurids have been known for a century, and a significant year-to-year variation in the activity level has become apparent. This variability happens because some of the Taurid complex is trapped in a resonance with Jupiter (these trapped particles are called the Taurid resonant swarm); when Earth passes close to the center of these trapped particles, the activity level is particularly high. While most of the trapped Taurid particles are tiny, the resonant swarm may also contain asteroids 100 meters wide or larger that have been trapped by Jupiter’s gravity. This means that when Earth passes close to the center of this particle swarm, it could be passing close to potentially hazardous asteroids — but how many hazardous asteroids are actually there?

To answer this question, Ye and collaborators analyzed data from the Zwicky Transient Facility during two recent encounters with the Taurid swarm. They found no trace of potentially hazardous 100-meter-plus asteroids — phew! The non-detection suggests that there are only 9–14 asteroids this large in the Taurid swarm. This is tiny compared to the 3,000 or more known potentially hazardous asteroids. These observations also allowed the team to estimate the size of the comet 2P/Encke parent body at just 10 kilometers, which is smaller than previously thought.

Next, Elizabeth Silber (Sandia National Laboratories) discussed a topic of importance to planetary defense. Earth is constantly being bombarded with debris, and while most of this debris is extremely fine and poses no threat to us, larger objects can be destructive. Large meteoroids (objects up to 1 meter in diameter) and asteroids (objects larger than 1 meter in diameter) can generate shock waves that can be felt on the ground and can damage property and cause injuries. For example, in 2013, the house-sized (18-meter-wide) Chelyabinsk meteor exploded with an energy equivalent to 440 kilotons of TNT and shattered thousands of windows.

cartoon showing different types of meteors and their light curves and infrasound measurements

Demonstration of how the properties of a meteor are reflected in light curves and infrasound measurements. Click to enlarge. [From slide by Elizabeth Silber]

In order to predict destructive events like these, it’s important to be able to characterize asteroids. This can be done using a variety of ground- and space-based techniques. Silber focused on the measurement of asteroidal impact energy with infrasound: low-frequency sound below the threshold of human hearing. Infrasound detectors provide a powerful way to study asteroids because they can be deployed in remote areas and can work night and day and in essentially any weather conditions.

Silber’s goal was to develop a practical way to estimate an asteroid’s impact energy — and eventually size and velocity — which will help to assess future threats. The team combined a sample of infrasound measurements with other measured asteroid properties and light curves to assess the reliability of the infrasound technique. Ultimately, this work will aid in determining the rate at which asteroids of various sizes impact Earth’s atmosphere and the level of risk associated with asteroids of different sizes.

Finally, Victor Oyiboka (University of Texas at Dallas) introduced new work on the role of radioisotopes on the evolution of Earth-like planets. Radioisotopes are radioactive forms of elements. Essentially, these are unstable atoms that split into more stable forms and release energy. As radioactive isotopes in a planet’s interior decay into more stable forms, the energy released heats the planet, helping to shape its evolution.

plot of heat production as a function of planet age

Model results for the heat production of Earth-like exoplanets as a function of planet age. [From slide by Victor Oyiboka]

Oyiboka and collaborators used the properties and half-lives — the time it takes for half of a radioactive sample to decay — of several critical radioisotopes to model the amount of radioactive heat produced by an Earth-like planet as a function of time after the formation of the galaxy and the planet’s age. For Earth, the most important radioisotopes were initially aluminum-26, which provided the bulk of the internal heat to the young Earth, and iron-60. These short-lived isotopes have long since decayed, leaving behind long-lived isotopes like potassium-40, thorium-232, uranium-235, and uranium-238 that still exist today. The team’s calculations gave them an estimate of the heat produced internally, which they then converted to a flux of heat through the planet’s surface. These estimates will be useful for studies of planetary evolution and habitability.

Slides from these three presentations are available in the press kit.

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: Laboratory Investigations Toward Understanding Ocean World Surfaces (Tuan Vu)

The first of four plenary sessions at this year’s conference introduced laboratory experiments relevant to planetary science. First was Tuan Vu of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, who described laboratory work that explores the salts and ices that might be found on some of the ocean worlds in our solar system. Ocean worlds — planetary bodies with surface or subsurface oceans — are potential habitats for life beyond Earth and are therefore of great interest to planetary scientists. Among our solar system’s ocean worlds are Jupiter’s moon Europa, which likely contains twice as much water as Earth, and Saturn’s tiny moon Enceladus, which despite its small size may contain 14–20% as much water as Earth. These moons’ subsurface oceans are thought to be salty and chemically complex, and knowing the composition of these worlds’ oceans is critical to understanding their geochemistry and habitability.

Vu focused on Europa, which is soon to be visited by the Europa Clipper mission. Unlike Enceladus, which frequently broadcasts the contents of its ocean via plumes that erupt from fissures in its surface, Europa only rarely emits plumes. This means that researchers will likely need to glean the composition of Europa’s oceans by studying its surface, which may be spotted with frozen brine from infrequent plumes or ocean material welling up through cracks in the ice shell. The first challenge for this tactic is measuring the composition of the surface. Then, researchers must translate the composition of ices on the surface to the composition of liquids in the moon’s ocean by determining how ocean materials will be altered by deposition on the surface and exposure to the intense radiation environment.

Observations from ground-based telescopes, the Hubble Space Telescope, and the Galileo spacecraft have found evidence for sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium- and magnesium-containing minerals, and sulfates on Europa’s surface. Vu’s team created laboratory brines from sodium, chloride, magnesium, and sulfate ions and observed the minerals that formed under different ion concentrations, ion ratios, and freezing rates. These experiments showed that mirabilite (NaSO4) preferentially forms over epsomite (MgSO4) even when magnesium ions are abundant. However, epsomite has been observed on Europa, with sodium instead latching on to chlorine to form NaCl. This combination cannot be achieved by the simple freezing of ocean materials. Instead, it requires an ocean rich in NaCl and a surface that is bombarded by ionizing radiation, further processing the ocean materials after they reach the surface and freeze.

plot of surviving colony forming units under different experimental conditions

Colony forming units (CFU) of Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis bacteria after exposure to ambient conditions, vitreous salt hydrate, and crystalline salt hydrate. [From slide by Tuan Vu]

Considering the effect of freezing rate, Vu’s team found that flash freezing creates glassy, amorphous blobs of frozen brine rather than sharply defined crystals. These glassy structures appear to be highly stable — in other words, they’re unlikely to crystallize over time. This has a couple of interesting implications: first, amorphous (otherwise known as vitreous) salt tends to have fewer spectral features than crystalline salt. (Here, salt is used in the chemical sense to mean a compound made from positive and negative ions; table salt — sodium chloride — is just one example of a salt.) This means that if future missions to Europa find unexpectedly bland surface spectra, amorphous salt may be to blame. Second, amorphous salt is less likely to damage cellular structures when freezing than crystalline salt. This has important consequences for the search for life on Europa. To investigate this finding further, Vu’s team acquired a bacterium that is found in antarctic seawater — which is both cold and extremely salty — and brought samples of bacteria down to 100K (roughly the temperature of Europa’s surface) in the presence of amorphous or crystalline salt. Remarkably, many of the bacteria survived the journey to freezing and back, with the amorphous sample faring better than the crystalline sample.

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: The Next-Generation Laboratory Experiments on Planetary Materials (Xinting Yu)

Certain worlds in the solar system can appear deceptively Earth-like while being completely alien. Such is the case for Saturn’s largest moon, Titan, which sports familiar-looking seas, clouds, and dunes. Xinting Yu (University of Texas at San Antonio) was introduced to materials science via Titan’s curiously Earth-like dunes. Earth’s dunes are primarily made of quartz, while Titan’s dunes are made of organic material.

Yu and collaborators initially attempted to study Titan-like dunes in a wind tunnel using ground walnut shells and coffee grounds as a stand-in for the dune material. However, these materials were a poor analog, leading the team to explore tholins as an option. Tholins are a class of molecule thought to exist in Titan’s ever-present haze layer. They can be created by adding energy to a mixture of nitrogen and methane. While tholins excel at imitating organic compounds on Titan, they’re also toxic and time-consuming to make. (In three days, the team generated just one gram of the 2–3 kilograms they needed for the wind tunnel.) Instead of going this route, Yu’s team studied the material properties of Titan’s dunes and used these properties to scale the wind tunnel data.

This experience led Yu to bring materials science techniques to planetary science questions. With the Dragonfly mission expected to touch down on Titan (on the dunes, in fact!) in 2034, materials-science-inspired studies of Titan are timely. Recently, Yu’s planetary materials lab has sought to answer two pressing questions: 1) does the fact that lab-made Titan materials are prepared in air that contains oxygen and water vapor — two things absent from Titan’s atmosphere — affect their properties, and 2) are the tholins made in labs really like the tholins on Titan?

plot of total surface energy of lab-generated tholins

Demonstration of how the total surface energy of lab-generated tholins changes with the chemical mixture used to make them (represented by the color of the bar) and the experimental setup (labeled on the horizontal axis). Click to enlarge. [From slide by Xinting Yu]

To answer the first question, Yu’s team devised a method to create tholins without ever letting them touch Earth air. As it turns out, exposure to Earth’s atmosphere completely changes the material. To answer the second question, Yu’s team first collaborated with other Titan-materials labs to compare the properties of tholins created in different labs. While the lab setups used to create the samples were all different, they were transported, stored, and analyzed the same way. This study showed that the largest determining factor in the surface energy (a measure of the “stickiness” of the molecules, which impacts their behavior) of tholin samples is the experimental setup. This study also allowed the team to show that tholin samples energized with cold plasma rather than ultraviolet light provided the best match to existing Titan cloud observations.

Yu’s team has put together a database of these materials for anyone wanting to study Titan. Yu closed the talk with a video tour of the Planetary Material CHaractErization Facility (PMCHEF) and a reminder than tholins aren’t just relevant to Titan — hazes are thought to be common in exoplanets, and laboratory studies can help researchers peer into those planets’ atmospheres as well.

Return to Table of Contents.


Plenary Lecture: Spectroscopy of Fine-particulate Minerals in the Laboratory and the Field: A TREX Perspective (Melissa Lane)

Melissa Lane (Fibernetics) closed out the session with a two-part talk that covered spectral characterization of mineral dust and investigation of rover techniques. In order to interpret spectra of distant planets, researchers need to be able to refer to laboratory spectra of common planetary materials. Lane’s team’s goal was to collect far-ultraviolet to mid-infrared laboratory spectra of 27 types of mineral dust. Why study dust? Dust is ubiquitous in the solar system, coating geological features of interest and interfering with human and robotic exploration.

Example Frankenspectrum of olivine

Example Frankenspectrum of olivine. [Slide by Melissa Lane]

The team created samples of finely ground minerals and distributed them to several labs for analysis. Using a variety of setups, the labs returned spectra of the materials over different wavelength ranges, which Lane and collaborators scaled, adjusted, and stitched together to create a single “Frankenspectrum” for each mineral. All 27 Frankenspectra are available on the Planetary Data System along with the original, unadjusted spectra. While the Frankenspectra have limitations — Lane notes that they weren’t collected under vacuum conditions, which means that the mid-infrared portions of the spectra aren’t appropriate for comparing to spectra of airless bodies — this study goes a long way toward providing an extensive library of reference spectra for planetary studies.

Lab spectra are also important for guiding autonomous robotic exploration of planetary worlds. In the second portion of the talk, Lane’s team used the Zoë rover to explore the outcomes of different rover mission architectures: 1) autonomous rover, 2) traditional remote-team-guided rover, and 3) astronaut and semi-autonomous rover. The team traveled to Yellow Cat, Utah, and to the Hopi Buttes volcanic field in northern Arizona, both of which have a variety of geologic features. They found that while the autonomous rover was the fastest, it missed things that the human-guided scenarios caught.

Return to Table of Contents.

logo of the American Astronomical Society

AAS Director of Scholarly Publishing Kerry Kroffe

AAS Director of Scholarly Publishing Kerry Kroffe [Nick Leoni]

Last month, Kerry Kroffe joined the AAS staff as Director of Scholarly Publishing. While Kerry may be new to the AAS staff and to many members of the AAS community, he and the AAS journals go way back — read on to learn about Kerry’s journey to his present role and his goals for the AAS journals publishing experience.

The Path to the AAS

After his first publishing role with a for-profit book publisher, Kerry joined the staff at the University of Chicago Press working as the Assistant Publication Manager for the AAS journals in 2000. Working with former AAS CEO Bob Milkey and current CEO Kevin Marvel, he found that the AAS journals embodied a publishing ethos that spoke to him — rather than a for-profit model that endlessly seeks to maximize profit at the expense of the contributors or the audience, the AAS staff sought to be good stewards of the literature, and to serve the authors and the readers.

“I’ve worked with medical professionals, biopharm, all sorts of groups out there, and I’ve honestly just not found a community that I resonate with as much as the astronomers,” Kerry says.

Kerry Kroffe photographed at Grand Canyon National Park

In addition to thru-hiking, Kerry’s also a fan of national parks — he’s hiked in 27 of them, including Grand Canyon National Park, seen in the background here. [Kerry Kroffe]

When the AAS journals portfolio transitioned publishers from the University of Chicago Press to the Institute of Physics (IOP) Publishing in 2008, Kerry followed. He shepherded AAS journals articles through the publishing process at IOP until 2014, when he planned to undertake a thru-hike of the 2,200-mile Appalachian Trail. But the trail would have to wait — having already told IOP his plans to depart several months in the future, Kerry got an offer he couldn’t refuse: to work at the Public Library of Science (PLOS), a nonprofit open-access science publisher.

“It had always been a dream of mine to work at PLOS,” Kerry says. “I loved what they stood for.” At PLOS, he was responsible for all of the editorial operations — everything on the peer-review side, as well as production for all of the journals. Eventually, the IT and business analytics teams came under his wing as well. Kerry remained at PLOS, eventually overseeing nearly 80 staff, for five years.

In 2019, life had other plans once again, and Kerry stepped away from his successful role at PLOS for personal reasons. While evaluating future moves, fate intervened when Julie Steffen — AAS Chief Publishing Officer at the time and Kerry’s former coworker at University of Chicago Press — emailed to announce her retirement.

Now, as AAS’s Director of Scholarly Publishing, Kerry will lead and support the AAS publishing team and interface with IOP Publishing and eJournal Press, which provides the peer-review software. He’ll also maintain the various AAS publishing imprints as well as monograph publishing.

How Can We Make Your Experience More Delightful?

When you think about the process of publishing research in an academic journal, does the word delightful come to mind? Kerry hopes so, and one of his aims as Director of Scholarly Publishing is to make the publishing process delightfully effortless.

“One of the things that I’m really interested in is how we can change our interaction with our contributors to make it as frictionless as possible,” Kerry says. Part of this goal is ensuring that authors are only asked for materials that are absolutely necessary, rather than making them jump through hoops that take their time away from what really matters: research! (Kerry recalled a time when authors were asked to make print-ready CMYK versions of all their images — a task important for the publication of a physical article, but one that’s well outside a researcher’s purview.)

To succeed in this goal, Kerry welcomes feedback and constructive criticism from the tight-knit AAS community. “These journals are for the community in which we exist,” Kerry says. “I want to hear from our researchers how we can better perform for you. It’s not just about what we offer now, but what you would like to see in the future. I would love to hear if things go swimmingly, but I also do want to hear when things don’t go great. Constructive criticism is some of the most valuable feedback someone can ever give.”

Want to chat with Kerry about the AAS journals and share your feedback? You can find him at the AAS publishing booth throughout the upcoming 245th AAS meeting in National Harbor, Maryland.

1 2 3 4 22