Say you’ve measured an exoplanet’s mass and radius. How do you know if this distant planet is a waterlogged ocean world or a desiccated desert? Astronomers turn to increasingly sophisticated models of planetary interiors to answer this question.
A Case of Planetary Magmatism
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80090/8009011b0f2c6ccc884c79b9325b8cd2803eba89" alt="a cutaway model of Earth's interior, with the layers labeled. from the outside to the inside: crust, upper mantle, mantle, outer core, inner core"
A diagram of Earth’s interior. Earth’s mantle is mostly solid, but it can melt into magma and be extruded onto the surface as lava through volcanoes. [NASA (Adapted from Goddard Media Studios)]
If an exoplanet orbits close to its parent star or has a thick atmosphere that traps heat, its mantle — the layer between the core and the surface — might be magma rather than solid rock. When water dissolves into this molten material, it seeps into the planet’s interior and reduces the supply of surface water. In today’s article, Caroline Dorn (University of Zurich, Switzerland) and Tim Lichtenberg (University of Oxford, UK) explore the effects of global magma oceans on the observed and inferred properties of exoplanets.
Modeling Molten Mantles
Dorn and Lichtenberg tested the effects of different planetary interiors by modeling exoplanets with iron cores, silicate-rich mantles, and an outer layer of pure water in the form of ice, liquid, or steam. The team solved fluid mechanics equations to determine the equilibrium states of planets with three different interior structures:
- A: mantle is dry, rocky, and solid throughout
- B: mantle contains melted regions that do not sequester water (dry melt–solid interior)
- C: mantle contains melted regions that do sequester water (wet melt–solid interior).
The authors found that a planet’s interior structure has a discernible effect on its size. For planets of the same mass, those with wet melt–solid interiors can be as much as 16% smaller than those with dry melt–solid interiors or rocky interiors. This can be explained on the molecular level: water molecules nestled snugly between silicate molecules in the mantle increase a planet’s radius less than freewheeling water molecules in the atmosphere or on the surface.
How Much Water?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bb01/0bb014d07ecc0b363c8346e3988fccc7a3efa6c8" alt="inferred water mass fraction as a function of planetary radius, mass, and interior model"
Inferred water mass fraction for a range of planet masses for each of the authors’ three models for the planets’ interiors. [Dorn & Lichtenberg 2021]
Additionally, these results raise interesting questions about a planet’s supply of water over long timescales; with water safely contained beneath the planet’s surface rather than settled on its surface or suspended in its atmosphere, it may be less likely to be lost to space.
Citation
“Hidden Water in Magma Ocean Exoplanets,” Caroline Dorn and Tim Lichtenberg 2021 ApJL 922 L4. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac33af