Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.
Title: Fast Radio Bursts from White Dwarf Binary Mergers: Isolated and Triple-Induced Channels
Authors: Cheyanne Shariat et al.
First Author’s Institution: California Institute of Technology
Status: Published in ApJL
The History of Fast Radio Bursts
Since the discovery of the Lorimer Burst in 2007, astronomers have studied fast radio bursts (FRBs) in extreme detail. However, these extragalactic millisecond-duration radio transients have remained an enigma. Like many astrophysical phenomena, their discovery was serendipitous. The most prolific FRB-discovery instrument, CHIME, was not originally built to study them; the acronym stands for “Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment,” reflecting its original (and ongoing) mission to map the cosmological distribution of hydrogen in the primordial universe. Since its construction, CHIME has discovered several thousand FRBs and even identified a smaller fraction that are known to repeat, some with consistent periods and others that are sporadic and seemingly random. (Check out their live catalog of repeating sources.)
Despite having thousands of sources to study, the only thing we know fairly confidently about FRBs is that many of them are extragalactic, and some others are even at cosmological distances. If we don’t understand how FRBs are produced, how can we know their distance? FRBs display a unique signature in their radio spectra, where higher frequencies arrive at the telescope first and lower frequencies arrive later, delayed by an inverse frequency-squared relationship. In a “dynamic spectrum,” this makes the pulse actually appear like a sweep from high to low frequency that follows the shape of a parabola; for example, the brightest pixels in Figure 1 of this Bite display this sweeping shape. This effect results from the FRB propagating through an ionized plasma with a specific density. Since the FRB is ultimately an electromagnetic wave, this slows down the speed of the FRB as a function of frequency. Measuring this effect, called dispersion, allows us to infer that the FRB signal passed through more plasma than can be accounted for within our own Milky Way galaxy, indicating that the FRB must have originated from much farther away. So far, there is only one example of an FRB from within our own galaxy, which was identified as originating from a magnetar, a highly magnetic pulsar.
FRB Progenitor Candidates
Although we know that most FRBs are located at extragalactic or even cosmological distances, it’s still not clear what objects that can generate them. Since magnetars and other compact objects are often considered reliable progenitors of FRBs, understanding their populations and comparing them with observed FRBs may reveal the origin of FRBs. Candidate FRB progenitor systems are usually divided into “prompt” channels — like the collapse of a star into a magnetar during a core-collapse supernova — and “delayed” channels where the FRB engine is formed on longer timescales, like accretion-induced collapse of white dwarfs or compact-object mergers. Figure 1 displays several of these channels, particularly those considered in today’s article, in which stellar evolution results in the transfer of material from one star to another (accretion-induced collapse) or gravitational radiation allows two objects to inspiral and merge. These events could create highly magnetized white dwarfs or magnetars that may produce FRBs.
Figure 1: Three different pathways and their associated fractions for producing an FRB candidate. Depending on the mass and composition of the merging objects, an FRB candidate may be produced instead of causing the white dwarf to explode in a Type Ia supernova. These are the systems of interest in today’s article. [Shariat et al. 2026]
Simulating Hierarchical Triples
In today’s article, we’re considering the role of hierarchical triple star systems in producing FRB-emitting objects. A hierarchical triple consists of an inner binary and a distant, tertiary star; see the first panel of Figure 1. These systems may play an important role because many stars that become white dwarfs of at least 0.8 solar mass exist in hierarchical triples: 35% of 2-solar-mass stars and 50% of 8-solar-mass stars are in triples. Stars of both masses will end their lives as white dwarfs.
The tertiary star plays an essential role in increasing the likelihood of the inner binary interacting: the eccentric Kozai–Lidov (EKL) mechanism causes the inner orbit to oscillate between highly inclined (with respect to the orbit of the tertiary star) and highly eccentric. Unlike isolated binaries that aren’t excited in this way, the eccentric orbit phase causes the inner stars to pass much closer to each other, increasing the likelihood of interaction or even a merger that could produce an FRB-emitting remnant.
The authors of today’s article produced a realistic population of triple systems by sampling from empirically measured distributions of masses, periods, and orbital eccentricities. These distributions were derived from observations collected by the Gaia satellite, an all-sky optical telescope that has now observed more than one billion stars in the Milky Way. The authors also created a “control” sample of isolated binaries by removing the tertiary star from the same sample of systems. The systems were then evolved for an age randomly selected between 0 and 12.5 billion years to simulate “constant” star formation similar to that in the Milky Way. Finally, they reapply these simulations at three different “metallicities” — the fraction of elements other than hydrogen or helium relative to that of the Sun.
Figure 2 displays these two populations: the isolated binaries are shown as filled histograms, and the hierarchical triples are shown as histograms with dashed lines. Each column represents the three different progenitor classes considered in Figure 1. At solar metallicity, the delays to merging are greater in triples than in secular binaries, leading to more mergers overall (top left panel). At lower metallicities, there are fewer mergers in all progenitor pathways in triples than in isolated binaries due to changes in stellar evolution attributed to weaker winds and larger pre-white dwarf masses.
Figure 2: The number of mergers as a function of time from the hierarchical triple’s formation, given different three metallicities (rows) and the three primary formation pathways for FRB-emitting merged remnants considered in Figure 1. Filled histograms are isolated binaries, dashed histograms are triples. [Shariat et al. 2026]
A Cosmic Population of FRBs
Since we can’t realistically track individual star systems from their formation to the end, we need to convert the delay-time distributions shown in Figure 2 to an observable. To do this, the authors combine the results of their simulations with measurements of the cosmic star formation rate — how many stars form per unit time as a function of the universe’s age — and the evolution of the universe’s metallicity as stars fuse hydrogen into heavier elements and return this material to the interstellar medium as these stars end their lives in shedding red giants or supernovae. This analysis produces the number of FRBs that should be observed as a function of distance or lookback time into the universe’s history, which is displayed in Figure 3.
Figure 3: The number of FRBs expected as a function of cosmological redshift. The present is to the left, the distant and early universe is on the right. The top panel shows the three formation channels, with binary and triple systems separated. The bottom panel displays the composite rate and compares it with empirical estimates from existing FRB observations. [Shariat et al. 2026]
Original astrobite edited by Catherine Slaughter.
About the author, Will Golay:
I am a graduate student in the Department of Astronomy at Harvard University and the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, advised by Edo Berger. I study radio emission from transient astrophysical objects like tidal disruption events.